TRAINING TECHNIQUE FOR LEARNING AGILE METHODOLOGY

• US 20080305460A1
• Filed: 05/11/2007
• Published: 12/11/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 10/12/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Wipro Limited
• Original Assignee: Wipro Limited
• Inventors: Garg, Swati
• Application Number:
  US11/747,247
• Publication Number:
  US 20080305460A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/118
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/00 Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying F41G3/26
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/0053 Computers, e.g. programming

Abstract

A method of training team participants to learn XP practices for generating a required application for a customer includes selectively using a combination of numeric, alphanumeric and pictorial puzzles/brain teasers and a set of role play instructions upon the training team participants learning of theoretical aspects of Agile methodology practices. The method delivers twelve programming practice-requirement-skills of: Onsite Customer, Planning Game, Small Iterations, Simple Design, Metaphor, Re-factoring Metaphor-use, Pair-Programming, Collective ownership, Sustainable Pace, Coding Standards, and Testing and Continuous Integration. The learning kit through timed iterations assists in designing, testing and code-release conforming to coding standards. The learning kit assists in producing the required code for the customer within time constraints of several iteration steps which precede code generation. The participants work and learn in team pairs which can be rotated if necessary.

Claims

1. A method of training team participants in learning Agile methodology for generating a required application comprises selectively using combination of numeric, alphanumeric and pictorial puzzles/brain teasers an set of role play instructions upon the team participants learning theoretical aspects of Agile methodology.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the Agile methodology comprises Extreme programming (XP) practices.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the XP practices selected from the group consisting of Metaphor, Onsite Customer, Planning Game, Small Release, Sustainable Pace, Simple Design, Re-factoring, Testing First Development, Pair Programming, coding Standards, Continuous Integration, and Collective Ownership.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein selectively using the numeric, alphanumeric and pictorial puzzles/brain teasers comprises:

selectively combining numeric, alphanumeric and pictorial puzzles/brain teasers to create user story cards and the set of role play instructions that drives connections between different user story cards.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein training the team participants in learning XP practices for generating the required application, comprises:

forming multiple subgroups using the training team participants, wherein each subgroup plays a predetermined number of roles to be performed by the training team participants;

handing over the set of role play instructions to each team participant playing one of the predetermined number of roles in each subgroup;

handing over the created user story cards to team participants from each subgroup; and

playing the game per the set of role play instructions and the created story cards iteratively by the team participants until the required application is achieved by any one of the subgroups.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the predetermined number of roles is substantially less than the number of training team participants.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the predetermined number of roles includes roles selected from the group consisting of customer, Agile coach, faculty/instructor, consultant, and Agile team.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

forming a separate customer role play group by using at least one team participant from each subgroup to prepare differently from each of the remaining subgroup team participants; and

using an assessment sheet by each member in the separate customer role play group so that each team participant playing the customer role can assess their associated subgroups'"'"'s performance.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

handing over the set of role play instructions to each team participant by an associated faculty/instructor;

clarifying any doubt each team participant may have by the associated faculty/instructor; and

assessing each subgroup'"'"'s performance by an associated team participant playing the customer role.

10. The method as in claim 9, wherein the training team participants work in team pairs with a time-constraint including the step of rotating the training team participants in each said team pair in each iteration.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

concluding the method of training team participants at the end of a predetermined number of playing iterations.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

concluding the method of training team participants when a final solution of required application is generated by any of the subgroup'"'"'s training team participants.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

generating another required application by any of the training team participants upon completing the method of training team participants.