Intelligent Database Scanning

• US 20090006327A1
• Filed: 06/29/2007
• Published: 01/01/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/29/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Original Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Inventors: Pamp, Johan
• Application Number:
  US11/770,925
• Publication Number:
  US 20090006327A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

Locating potential licensees and infringers of a patent or other intellectual property can be facilitated by determining whether someone other than the property owner is trying or has tried to patent the same or related subject matter. For example, if an applicant files a patent application but does not respond to an action or other patentability opinion by a patent office that cites prior art references, then it can be presumed that one or more of the cited references must be of interest for the applicant, and vice versa with respect to the owners of the cited references. References cited and, if desired, whether an applicant has responded to a patent office'"'"'s patentability opinion can be determined from patent data publicly available in computer databases maintained by many patent offices around the world.

Claims

1. A method of identifying information that is relevant to an intellectual property, comprising the steps of:

scanning a computer database of patent data, wherein the patent data includes information about patent application prosecutions; and

as a result of a scan, locating information that an indicator of the intellectual property is cited in a patentability opinion issued in a patent application.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of providing located information to an owner of the intellectual property.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the locating step comprises locating information that no response to the patentability opinion was made.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the locating step comprises locating information that a divisional patent application that is related to the patent application has been filed.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the indicator of the intellectual property is at least one of a patent application, a patent, and a printed publication.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the indicator of the intellectual property is cited in the patentability opinion as a basis for at least one of lack of novelty and obviousness.

7. An apparatus for identifying information that is relevant to an intellectual property, comprising a user computer in electronic communication with a computer database of patent data that includes information about patent application prosecutions, wherein the user computer is configured to query the database and receive query results that include information that an indicator of the intellectual property is cited in a patentability opinion issued in a patent application.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the electronic communication between the user computer and the computer server is carried out by a web browser via the internet.

9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the computer database is located at a patent office.

10. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the computer database is located at the user computer.

11. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program for identifying information that is relevant to an intellectual property, wherein the computer program when executed causes the computer to perform the steps of:

scanning a computer database of patent data, wherein the patent data includes information about patent application prosecutions; and

as a result of a scan, locating information that an indicator of the intellectual property is cited in a patentability opinion issued in a patent application.

12. The medium of claim 11, wherein the computer program causes the computer to perform the further step of providing located information to an owner of the intellectual property.

13. The medium of claim 11, wherein the locating step comprises locating information that no response to the patentability opinion was made.

14. The medium of claim 11, wherein the locating step comprises locating information that a divisional patent application that is related to the patent application has been filed.

15. The medium of claim 11, wherein the indicator of the intellectual property is at least one of a patent application, a patent, and a printed publication.

16. The medium of claim 11, wherein the indicator of the intellectual property is cited in the patentability opinion as a basis for at least one of lack of novelty and obviousness.