Probabilistic modeling system for product design

0Associated
Cases 
0Associated
Defendants 
0Accused
Products 
14Forward
Citations 
0
Petitions 
1
Assignment
First Claim
1. . A method for designing a product, comprising:
 obtaining data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product;
preprocessing the data records based on characteristics of the input variables;
selecting one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables;
generating a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records;
providing a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and
using the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A method is provided for designing a product. The method may include obtaining data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product; and preprocessing the data records based on characteristics of the input variables. The method may also include selecting one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; and generating a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records. Further, the method may include providing a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and using the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.
113 Citations
View as Search Results
Symmetric random scatter process for probabilistic modeling system for product design  
Patent #
US 7,877,239 B2
Filed 06/30/2006

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

SYMMETRIC RANDOM SCATTER PROCESS FOR PROBABILISTIC MODELING SYSTEM FOR PRODUCT DESIGN  
Patent #
US 20100250202A1
Filed 06/30/2006

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Method and system for reducing a data set  
Patent #
US 7,805,421 B2
Filed 11/02/2007

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Method and system for reducing a data set  
Patent #
US 20090119323A1
Filed 11/02/2007

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Asymmetric random scatter process for probabilistic modeling system for product design  
Patent #
US 20090132216A1
Filed 12/17/2008

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

System and method for improving data coverage in modeling systems  
Patent #
US 20090300052A1
Filed 05/30/2008

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

ComputerImplemented Systems And Methods For Executing Stochastic Discrete Event Simulations For Design Of Experiments  
Patent #
US 20090312992A1
Filed 06/08/2009

Current Assignee
SAS Institute Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
SAS Institute Incorporated

System and method for improving data coverage in modeling systems  
Patent #
US 8,086,640 B2
Filed 05/30/2008

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Computerimplemented systems and methods for executing stochastic discrete event simulations for design of experiments  
Patent #
US 8,306,788 B2
Filed 06/08/2009

Current Assignee
SAS Institute Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
SAS Institute Incorporated

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING ADAPTIVE SECURITY MODEL  
Patent #
US 20120159622A1
Filed 12/12/2011

Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute

Sponsoring Entity
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute

STOCHASTIC COMPUTATIONAL MODEL PARAMETER SYNTHESIS SYSTEM  
Patent #
US 20130124164A1
Filed 11/09/2012

Current Assignee
State University System of Florida, Carnegie Mellon University

Sponsoring Entity
State University System of Florida, Carnegie Mellon University

Asymmetric random scatter process for probabilistic modeling system for product design  
Patent #
US 8,209,156 B2
Filed 12/17/2008

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Systems and methods for simulating a resource constrained process  
Patent #
US 9,141,936 B2
Filed 03/11/2011

Current Assignee
SAS Institute Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
SAS Institute Incorporated

Stochastic computational model parameter synthesis system  
Patent #
US 9,558,300 B2
Filed 11/09/2012

Current Assignee
Carnegie Mellon University

Sponsoring Entity
Carnegie Mellon University

Integrated system for routine maintenance of mechanized equipment  
Patent #
US 7,356,393 B1
Filed 11/14/2003

Current Assignee
TurfCentric Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
TurfCentric Incorporated

Vehicle failure diagnosis apparatus and invehicle terminal for vehicle failure diagnosis  
Patent #
US 7,369,925 B2
Filed 07/20/2005

Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi Ltd.

Method and system for verifying virtual sensors  
Patent #
US 20080154811A1
Filed 12/21/2006

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity


System for controlling the urea supply to SCR catalysts  
Patent #
US 7,178,328 B2
Filed 12/20/2004

Current Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC

Sponsoring Entity
GM Global Technology Operations Incorporated

Apparatus and method for simulation of the control and machine behavior of machine tools and productionline machines  
Patent #
US 7,174,284 B2
Filed 10/21/2003

Current Assignee
Siemens AG

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Method for constructing composite response surfaces by combining neural networks with polynominal interpolation or estimation techniques  
Patent #
US 7,191,161 B1
Filed 07/31/2003

Current Assignee
U.S.A. as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Sponsoring Entity
U.S.A. as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Batch statistics process model method and system  
Patent #
US 20070061144A1
Filed 08/30/2005

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

System for estimating model parameters  
Patent #
US 7,194,392 B2
Filed 10/23/2003

Current Assignee
Cummins Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Cummins Incorporated

Artificial intelligence trending system  
Patent #
US 20070094181A1
Filed 09/18/2006

Current Assignee
Verizon Patent and Licensing Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Verizon Patent and Licensing Incorporated

Expert knowledge combination process based medical risk stratifying method and system  
Patent #
US 20070094048A1
Filed 07/31/2006

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

System and method for optimizing crosssell decisions for financial products  
Patent #
US 20070124237A1
Filed 11/30/2005

Current Assignee
General Electric Company

Sponsoring Entity
General Electric Company

Method for forecasting using a genetic algorithm  
Patent #
US 7,213,007 B2
Filed 12/24/2002

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Process model based virtual sensor and method  
Patent #
US 20070118338A1
Filed 11/18/2005

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Heuristic supply chain modeling method and system  
Patent #
US 20070150332A1
Filed 12/22/2005

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

One sample per symbol high rate programmable parallel architecture for digital demodulation  
Patent #
US 6,721,371 B1
Filed 01/05/2000

Current Assignee
L3 Communications Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
L3 Communications Corporation

High speed selfadjusting clock recovery circuit with frequency detection  
Patent #
US 5,757,857 A
Filed 03/13/1996

Current Assignee
Regents of the University of California

Sponsoring Entity
Regents of the University of California

Highly bandwidth efficient communications  
Patent #
US 6,359,923 B1
Filed 12/18/1997

Current Assignee
ATT Mobility II LLC

Sponsoring Entity
ATT Wireless Services Incorporated

Phase interpolator device and method  
Patent #
US 6,509,773 B2
Filed 04/30/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Broadcom Corporation

Optical adddrop multiplexer  
Patent #
US 6,404,525 B1
Filed 07/28/1998

Current Assignee
Rakuten Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
NEC Corporation

Wideband base station architecture for digital cellular communications system  
Patent #
US 5,768,268 A
Filed 07/19/1995

Current Assignee
WJ Communications Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Watkins Johnson Co.

Adaptive preequalizer for use in data communications equipment  
Patent #
US 5,881,108 A
Filed 02/22/1996

Current Assignee
Conexant Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity


Cascade boosting of predictive models  
Patent #
US 6,546,379 B1
Filed 10/26/1999

Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation

Modeling sequence and time series data in predictive analytics  
Patent #
US 20060010142A1
Filed 04/28/2005

Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Systems and methods to facilitate utilization of database modeling  
Patent #
US 20060010157A1
Filed 03/01/2005

Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Systems and methods for conducting an interactive financial simulation  
Patent #
US 20060010057A1
Filed 05/10/2005

Current Assignee
Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.

Automatic protocol migration when upgrading operating systems  
Patent #
US 20060026270A1
Filed 09/01/2004

Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Method and system for live operating environment upgrades  
Patent #
US 7,000,229 B2
Filed 07/24/2002

Current Assignee
Oracle America Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Sun Microsystems Incorporated

Sensor assemblies  
Patent #
US 20060025897A1
Filed 08/22/2005

Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Sponsoring Entity
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Systems and methods for operating system migration  
Patent #
US 20060026587A1
Filed 07/28/2005

Current Assignee
MONARCH LX LLC DBA ALACOS INC.

Sponsoring Entity
MONARCH LX LLC DBA ALACOS INC.

System and method for automated migration from Linux to Windows  
Patent #
US 20060064474A1
Filed 09/23/2004

Current Assignee
BeyondTrust Software Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
BeyondTrust Software Inc.

Oxygen depletion sensing for a remote starting vehicle  
Patent #
US 20060068973A1
Filed 09/27/2004

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Method and system for diagnostics and prognostics of a mechanical system  
Patent #
US 7,027,953 B2
Filed 12/30/2002

Current Assignee
RSL ELECTRONICS LTD.

Sponsoring Entity
RSL ELECTRONICS LTD.

Engine control system using a cascaded neural network  
Patent #
US 7,035,834 B2
Filed 05/15/2002

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Method for calibrating a mathematical model  
Patent #
US 7,024,343 B2
Filed 11/30/2001

Current Assignee
Visteon Global Technologies Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Visteon Global Technologies Incorporated

Operating system migration with minimal storage area network reconfiguration  
Patent #
US 20060130052A1
Filed 12/14/2004

Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation

System and method for managing emissions from mobile vehicles  
Patent #
US 20060129289A1
Filed 05/25/2005

Current Assignee
GE Global Sourcing LLC

Sponsoring Entity
GE Global Sourcing LLC

Diagnostic method and apparatus for business growth strategy  
Patent #
US 6,859,785 B2
Filed 01/11/2001

Current Assignee
CASE STRATEGY LLC

Sponsoring Entity
CASE STRATEGY LLC

Method and apparatus for generating transactionbased stimulus for simulation of VLSI circuits using event coverage analysis  
Patent #
US 6,859,770 B2
Filed 11/30/2000

Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
HewlettPackard Development Company L.P.

Method of analyzing a product  
Patent #
US 20050055176A1
Filed 08/20/2004

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Distance sorting algorithm for matching patterns  
Patent #
US 20050047661A1
Filed 08/27/2004

Current Assignee
Johns Hopkins University

Sponsoring Entity
Johns Hopkins University

System and method for regenerating exhaust system filtering and catalyst components  
Patent #
US 6,865,883 B2
Filed 12/12/2002

Current Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Detroit Diesel Corporation

Endtoend business process solution creation  
Patent #
US 20050091093A1
Filed 10/24/2003

Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation

NOx emissioncontrol system using a virtual sensor  
Patent #
US 6,882,929 B2
Filed 05/15/2002

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Control system of optimizing the function of machine assembly using GAFuzzy inference  
Patent #
US 6,895,286 B2
Filed 12/01/2000

Current Assignee
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha, Sanshin Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha, Sanshin Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

TESTING APPARATUS FOR CONDUCTING A TEST ON A MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM OR A MAGNETIC HEAD, THROUGH RECORDING TEST DATA ON THE MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM AND REPRODUCING RECORDED TEST DATA THEREFROM BY MEANS OF THE MAGNETIC HEAD  
Patent #
US 6,894,489 B2
Filed 12/16/2003

Current Assignee
Hitachi HighTech Electronics Engineering Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi HighTech Electronics Engineering Co. Ltd.

System and method for simulating a discrete event process using business system data  
Patent #
US 20040034857A1
Filed 08/19/2002

Current Assignee
General Electric Capital Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
General Electric Capital Corporation

System and method for nonlinear dynamic control based on soft computing with discrete constraints  
Patent #
US 20040030420A1
Filed 07/30/2002

Current Assignee
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Systems and methods for statistical modeling of complex data sets  
Patent #
US 20040059518A1
Filed 09/11/2003

Current Assignee
DAVID ROTHSCHILD COMPANY

Sponsoring Entity
DAVID ROTHSCHILD COMPANY

System for estimating absolute boost pressure in a turbocharged internal combustion engine  
Patent #
US 6,698,203 B2
Filed 03/19/2002

Current Assignee
Cummins Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Cummins Incorporated

System and method for providing computer upgrade information  
Patent #
US 6,711,676 B1
Filed 10/15/2002

Current Assignee
RPX Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Zomaya Group Inc.

Electroencephalogram diagnosis apparatus and method  
Patent #
US 20040077966A1
Filed 04/18/2003

Current Assignee
Fuji Xerox Company Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Fuji Xerox Company Limited

Bayesian neural networks for optimization and control  
Patent #
US 6,725,208 B1
Filed 04/12/1999

Current Assignee
Rockwell Automation Technologies Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Pavilion Technologies Incorporated

Method and apparatus for optimizing overall characteristics of device  
Patent #
US 6,721,606 B1
Filed 03/24/2000

Current Assignee
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Medical data operating model development system and method  
Patent #
US 20040122703A1
Filed 12/19/2002

Current Assignee
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC

Sponsoring Entity
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC

Medical data processing system and method  
Patent #
US 20040122702A1
Filed 12/18/2002

Current Assignee
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC

Sponsoring Entity
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC

Computerbased system and method for monitoring the profitability of a manufacturing plant  
Patent #
US 20030018503A1
Filed 07/19/2001

Current Assignee
pVelocity Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
pVelocity Inc.

Method and apparatus for scoring the likelihood of a desired performance result  
Patent #
US 6,513,018 B1
Filed 05/05/1994

Current Assignee
Fair Isaac Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Fair Isaac Corporation

Residual signal alert generation for condition monitoring using approximated SPRT distribution  
Patent #
US 20030055607A1
Filed 06/07/2002

Current Assignee
SmartSignal Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
SmartSignal Corporation

Channel adaptive equalization precoding system and method  
Patent #
US 20030086515A1
Filed 10/03/2001

Current Assignee
Francois Trans, Tho L. Ngoc

Sponsoring Entity
Francois Trans, Tho L. Ngoc

System, method and computer product for incremental improvement of algorithm performance during algorithm development  
Patent #
US 20030093250A1
Filed 11/08/2001

Current Assignee
General Electric Company

Sponsoring Entity


Methods and systems for digitally processing optical data signals  
Patent #
US 20020012152A1
Filed 07/23/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Shape design process of engineering products and pneumatic tire designed using the present design process  
Patent #
US 20020014294A1
Filed 06/29/2001

Current Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Company Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Yokohama Rubber Company Limited

Method and system intended for realtime estimation of the flow mode of a multiphase fluid stream at all points of a pipe  
Patent #
US 20020016701A1
Filed 07/06/2001

Current Assignee
Institut Francais Du Petrole

Sponsoring Entity
Institut Francais Du Petrole

Modified phase interpolator and method to use same in highspeed, low power applications  
Patent #
US 6,359,486 B1
Filed 05/22/2000

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Sponsoring Entity
LSI Logic Corporation

Methods and systems for adaptive receiver equalization  
Patent #
US 20020034222A1
Filed 04/30/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited

System and method for integrating enterprise management application with network management operations  
Patent #
US 6,370,544 B1
Filed 06/17/1998

Current Assignee
Harris Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
ITT Manufacturing Enterprises Inc.

System and method for automatically searching and analyzing intellectual propertyrelated materials  
Patent #
US 20020042784A1
Filed 10/08/2001

Current Assignee
David S. Kerven, Lance D. Reich

Sponsoring Entity
David S. Kerven, Lance D. Reich

Method and system for dynamic datamining and online communication of customized information  
Patent #
US 20020049704A1
Filed 04/27/2001

Current Assignee
Ingrid V. Vanderveldt, Christopher Lee Black

Sponsoring Entity
Ingrid V. Vanderveldt, Christopher Lee Black

Highspeed serial data transceiver and related methods  
Patent #
US 20020044618A1
Filed 04/30/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Timing recovery and phase tracking system and method  
Patent #
US 20020044617A1
Filed 04/30/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited

Timing recovery and frequency tracking system and method  
Patent #
US 20020039395A1
Filed 04/30/2001

Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited

Signal processing apparatus and communication apparatus  
Patent #
US 6,397,048 B1
Filed 07/20/1999

Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Sharp Electronics Corporation

Method and apparatus for estimating data for engine control  
Patent #
US 6,405,122 B1
Filed 06/02/1999

Current Assignee
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha

Loan repay enforcement system  
Patent #
US 6,195,648 B1
Filed 08/10/1999

Current Assignee
RFC Lenders of Texas LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ron Mueller

Method and system for determining an absolute power loss condition in an internal combustion engine  
Patent #
US 6,199,007 B1
Filed 04/18/2000

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Method and apparatus for solving complex and computationally intensive inverse problems in realtime  
Patent #
US 6,208,982 B1
Filed 07/30/1997

Current Assignee
Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation

Method for optimizing multivariate calibrations  
Patent #
US 6,223,133 B1
Filed 05/14/1999

Current Assignee
ExxonMobil Research Engineering Company

Sponsoring Entity
ExxonMobil Research Engineering Company

Apparatus and method for diagnosing an engine using computer based models in combination with a neural network  
Patent #
US 6,240,343 B1
Filed 12/28/1998

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Virtual vehicle sensors based on neural networks trained using data generated by simulation models  
Patent #
US 6,236,908 B1
Filed 05/07/1997

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Detection for digital communication receivers  
Patent #
US 6,038,269 A
Filed 11/20/1997

Current Assignee
National Semiconductor Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
National Semiconductor Corporation

Human cystatin F  
Patent #
US 6,066,617 A
Filed 01/29/1998

Current Assignee
Human Genome Sciences Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Human Genome Sciences Incorporated

Neural network  
Patent #
US 5,857,177 A
Filed 11/05/1996

Current Assignee
Dimitris Elias Stassinopoulos, Alstr.O Slashed.M Preben

Sponsoring Entity
Dimitris Elias Stassinopoulos, Alstr.O Slashed.M Preben

Transmission system for digital signals, and transmitter and receiver therefor  
Patent #
US 5,881,107 A
Filed 03/11/1997

Current Assignee
Entropic Communications Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity


Method for determining the condition of engine oil based on soot modeling  
Patent #
US 5,914,890 A
Filed 10/30/1997

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity


System and method for automatically determining a set of variables for use in creating a process model  
Patent #
US 5,727,128 A
Filed 05/08/1996

Current Assignee
FisherRosemount Systems Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
FisherRosemount Systems Incorporated

System and method using separators for developing training records for use in creating an empirical model of a process  
Patent #
US 5,752,007 A
Filed 03/11/1996

Current Assignee
FisherRosemount Systems Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
FisherRosemount Systems Incorporated

Method for determining a remaining life of engine oil  
Patent #
US 5,750,887 A
Filed 11/18/1996

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Process for optimizing control parameters for a system having an actual behavior depending on the control parameters  
Patent #
US 5,598,076 A
Filed 06/09/1994

Current Assignee
Siemens AG

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

System and method for assessing medical risk  
Patent #
US 5,594,637 A
Filed 05/26/1993

Current Assignee
Base Ten Systems Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Base Ten Systems Inc.

Method and apparatus for inserting computer code into a high level language (HLL) software model of an electrical circuit to monitor test coverage of the software model when exposed to test inputs  
Patent #
US 5,604,895 A
Filed 09/29/1995

Current Assignee
Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Motorola Inc.

Apparatus and method for detecting a plugged air filter on an engine  
Patent #
US 5,604,306 A
Filed 07/28/1995

Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Caterpillar Incorporated

Standin Computer file server providing fast recovery from computer file server failures  
Patent #
US 5,608,865 A
Filed 03/14/1995

Current Assignee
Autonomy Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
NETWORK INTEGRITY INC.

Delaylocked loop  
Patent #
US 5,614,855 A
Filed 08/21/1995

Current Assignee
Rambus Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Rambus Inc.

Method and circuitry for clock synchronization  
Patent #
US 5,485,490 A
Filed 11/29/1994

Current Assignee
Rambus Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Rambus Inc.

Virtual continuous emission monitoring system with sensor validation  
Patent #
US 5,386,373 A
Filed 08/05/1993

Current Assignee
Rockwell Automation Technologies Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Pavilion Technologies Incorporated

Telemetered patient location system and method  
Patent #
US 5,396,224 A
Filed 11/22/1991

Current Assignee
Agilent Technologies Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
HP Inc.

Reliability model generator  
Patent #
US 5,014,220 A
Filed 09/06/1988

Current Assignee
The Boeing Co.

Sponsoring Entity
The Boeing Co.

Engine conditionresponsive shutdown and warning apparatus  
Patent #
US 4,136,329 A
Filed 05/12/1977

Current Assignee
Transportation Logic Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Transportation Logic Corporation

Credit risk computer  
Patent #
US 3,316,395 A
Filed 05/23/1963

Current Assignee
Michael G. Lavin

Sponsoring Entity
Michael G. Lavin

20 Claims
 1. . A method for designing a product, comprising:
obtaining data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product; preprocessing the data records based on characteristics of the input variables; selecting one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; generating a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records; providing a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and using the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.  View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
 11. . A computer readable medium including a set of instructions for enabling a processor to:
obtain data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product; preprocess the data records based on characteristics of the input variables; select one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; generate a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records; provide a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and use the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.  View Dependent Claims (12, 13, 14, 15)
 16. . A computerbased product design system, comprising:
a database containing data records relating one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with a product to be designed; and a processor configured to; obtain the data records relating to the one or more input variables and the one or more output parameters associated with the product; preprocess the data records based on characteristics of the input variables; select one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; generate a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records; provide a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and use the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.  View Dependent Claims (17, 18, 19, 20)
1 Specification
This disclosure relates generally to product design systems and, more particularly, to probabilistic design based modeling systems for use in product design applications with data preprocessing techniques.
Many computerbased applications exist for aiding in the design of products. Using these applications, an engineer can construct a computer model of a particular product and can analyze the behavior of the product through various analysis techniques. Further, certain analytical tools have been developed that enable engineers to evaluate and test multiple design configurations of a product. While these analytical tools may include internal optimization algorithms to provide this functionality, these tools generally represent only domain specific designs. Therefore, while product design variations can be tested and subsequently optimized, these design variations are typically optimized with respect to only a single requirement within a specific domain.
Finite element analysis (FEA) applications may fall into this domain specific category. With FEA applications, an engineer can test various product designs against requirements relating to stress and strain, vibration response, modal frequencies, and stability. Because the optimizing algorithms included in these FEA applications can optimize design parameters only with respect to a single requirement, however, multiple design requirements must be transformed into a single function for optimization. For example, in FEA analysis, one objective may be to parameterize a product design such that stress and strain are minimized. Because the FEA software cannot optimize both stress and strain simultaneously, the stress and strain design requirements may be transformed into a ratio of stress to strain (i.e., the modulus of elasticity). In the analysis, this ratio becomes the goal function to be optimized.
Several drawbacks result from this approach. For example, because more than one output requirement is transformed into a single goal function, the underlying relationships and interactions between the design parameters and the response of the product system are hidden from the design engineer. Further, based on this approach, engineers may be unable to optimize their designs according to competing requirements.
Thus, there is a need for modeling and analysis applications that can establish heuristic models between design inputs and outputs, subject to defined constraints, and optimize the inputs such that the probability of compliance of multiple competing outputs is maximized. There is also a need for applications that can explain the causal relationship between design inputs and outputs. Further, there is a need for applications that can collect desired patterns of design inputs to reduce computational load required by the optimization.
Certain applications have been developed that attempt to optimize design inputs based on multiple competing outputs. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,617 (“the '"'"'617 patent”) issued to Waldon et al. on Jul. 11, 2000, describes an optimization design system that includes a directed heuristic search (DHS). The DHS directs a design optimization process that implements a user'"'"'s selections and directions. The DHS also directs the order and directions in which the search for an optimal design is conducted and how the search sequences through potential design solutions.
While the optimization design system of the '"'"'617 patent may provide a multidisciplinary solution for product design optimization, this system has several shortcomings. The efficiency of this system is hindered by the need to pass through slow simulation tools in order to generate each new model result. Further, there is no knowledge in the system model of how stochastic variation in the input parameters relates to stochastic variation in the output parameters. The system of the '"'"'617 patent provides only single point solutions, which may be inadequate especially where a single point optimum may be unstable when subject to stochastic variability introduced by a manufacturing process or other sources. Further, the system of the '"'"'617 patent is limited in the number of dimensions that can be simultaneously optimized and searched.
Moreover, the '"'"'617 patent fails to consider characteristics of input variables, such as time series data or data clusters, etc., when performing product design modeling and optimization.
Methods and systems consistent with certain features of the disclosed systems are directed to solving one or more of the problems set forth above.
One aspect of the present disclosure includes a method for designing a product. The method may include obtaining data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product; and preprocessing the data records based on characteristics of the input variables. The method may also include selecting one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; and generating a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records. Further, the method may include providing a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and using the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.
Another aspect of the present disclosure includes a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium may include a set of instructions for enabling a processor to obtain data records relating to one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with the product; and to preprocess the data records based on characteristics of the input variables. The instructions may also enable the processor to select one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; and to generate a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records. Further, the instructions may enable the processor to provide a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and to use the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.
Another aspect of the present disclosure includes a computerbased product design system. The design system may include a database and a processor. The database may contain data records relating one or more input variables and one or more output parameters associated with a product to be designed. The processor may be configured to obtain the data records relating to the one or more input variables and the one or more output parameters associated with the product; and to preprocess the data records based on characteristics of the input variables. The processor may also be configured to select one or more input parameters from the one or more input variables; and to generate a computational model indicative of interrelationships between the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters based on the data records. Further, the processor may be configured to provide a set of constraints to the computational model representative of a compliance state for the product; and to use the computational model and the provided set of constraints to generate statistical distributions for the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters, wherein the one or more input parameters and the one or more output parameters represent a design for the product.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
A product design may be represented as a set of one or more input parameter values. These parameters may correspond to dimensions, tolerances, moments of inertia, mass, material selections, or any other characteristic affecting one or more properties of the product. The disclosed product design system 100 may be configured to provide a probabilistic product design such that one or more input parameters can be expressed as nominal values and corresponding statistical distributions. Similarly, the product design may include nominal values for one or more output parameters and corresponding statistical distributions. The statistical distributions of the output parameters may provide an indication of the probability that the product design complies with a desired set of output requirements.
Product design system 100 may include a processor 102, a memory module 104, a database 106, an I/O interface 108, and a network interface 110. Product design system 100 may also include a display 112. Any other components suitable for receiving and interacting with data, executing instructions, communicating with one or more external workstations, displaying information, etc., may also be included in product design system 100.
Processor 102 may include any appropriate type of general purpose microprocessor, digital signal processor, or microcontroller. Memory module 104 may include one or more memory devices including, but not limited to, a ROM, a flash memory, a dynamic RAM, and a static RAM. Memory module 104 may be configured to store information accessed and used by processor 102. Database 106 may include any type of appropriate database containing information relating to characteristics of input parameters, output parameters, mathematical models, and/or any other control information. I/O interface 108 may be connected to various data input devices (e.g., keyboards, pointers, drawing tablets, etc.)(not shown) to provide data and control information to product design system 100. Network interface 110 may include any appropriate type of network adaptor capable of communicating with other computer systems based on one or more communication protocols. Display 112 may include any type of device (e.g., CRT monitors, LCD screens, etc.) capable of graphically depicting information.
The data records may reflect characteristics of the input parameters and output parameters, such as statistical distributions, normal ranges, and/or tolerances, etc. For each data record, there may be a set of output parameter values that corresponds to a particular set of input variable values. The data records may represent pregenerated data that has been stored, for example, in database 106. The data may be computer generated or empirically collected through testing of actual products.
For example, the data records may be previously collected during a certain time period from a test product. The data records may also be collected from experiments designed for collecting such data. Alternatively, the data records may be generated artificially by other related processes, such as other design processes. The data records may also include training data and testing data used to train and validate certain process models associated with the product design. In addition, the data records may include simulation data used to observe and optimize the process models associated with the product design.
In one embodiment, the data records may be generated in the following manner. For a particular product to be designed, a design space of interest may be identified. A plurality of sets of random values may be generated for various input variables that fall within the desired product design space. Alternatively, nonrandom patterns of input data, such as those from designed experiments, may be used. The designed experiments may be conducted by using methods such as full and fractional factorial designs, Taguchi arrays, BoxBehnken designs, resolution surface map (RSM) deisgns, central composite patterns, Latin squares, and D or Aoptimal designs, etc. The resulting values may be supplied to at least one simulation algorithm to generate values for one or more output parameters related to the input variables. The at least one simulation algorithm may be associated with, for example, systems for performing finite element analysis, computational fluid dynamics analysis, radio frequency simulation, electromagnetic field simulation, electrostatic discharge simulation, network propagation simulation, discrete event simulation, constraintbased network simulation, or any other appropriate type of dynamic simulation.
At step 204, the data records may be preprocessed. Processor 102 may preprocess the data records to clean up the data records for obvious errors and to eliminate redundancies. Processor 102 may remove approximately identical data records and/or remove data records that are out of a reasonable range in order to be meaningful for model generation and optimization. For nonrandomly generated data records, any cases violating variable covariance terms may be eliminated.
Processor 102 may also preprocess the data records to make the data records to more accurately reflect characteristics of the product design or an existing product, especially when the data records contain data of time series or contain a large number of input variables. Data of time series, as used herein, may refer to data collected or recorded with time as a reference. For example, the data of time series may include continuous data samples of a sensor for a period of time. Processor 102 may perform preprocessing based on a particular product design or a particular corresponding existing product.
As shown in
Engine system 300 may be used to collect data records for an engine design. The data records may be collected from engine system 300 during a certain period of time, i.e., data of time series. The time series data records may include any appropriate parameters from engine 302, turbo 304, muffler 306, DAF section 308, and SCR section 310. For example, the data records may include sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5}.
A data record of sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5 }may be collected as a snapshot in time. That is, the sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5 }may be collected at the same time. However, because it may take a certain amount of time for the sensed subject (e.g., engine emission, etc.) to pass through sensors 311315 individually, the sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5 }may be inaccurate to represent the same sensed subject if measured or collected at the same time. For example, when measured relative to x_{1 }as a current reading, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5 }may represent readings of the sensed subject measured at x_{1 }with delays in time and in different degrees.
As shown in
Therefore, processor 102 may determine that the range of possible time lags is four units of time or four time lags. Among them, other sensor readings may be measured relative to x_{5}, that is, x_{5 }is considered as the present sensor reading of sensor 315 without time lags. Corresponding sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, and x_{4 }may be collected in previous data records to which the current reading may have certain time lags. However, because the time lag of each sensor may be nonlinear, it may be uncertain how many time lags should be considered with respect to each sensor readings of x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, and x_{4}.
Processor 102 may calculate correlations between output parameters and an input variable with time lags (step 406). Processor 102 may calculate individual correlation values corresponding to different time lags from the time lag range of the input variable. For example, for sensor reading x, of sensor 311, processor 102 may calculate correlation values between the output parameters and the sensor reading xi with one, two, three, four time lags, respectively. A correlation may refer to a statistical measure reflecting a relationship between two or more variables.
After calculating the correlation values (step 406), processor 102 may select a desired time lag based on the correlation values (step 408). For example, processor 102 may select a desired time lag corresponding to the largest correlation value. Other criteria may also be used to select the desired time lag.
After selecting desired time lags for each noncurrent input variable (e.g., sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5}, etc.) (step 408), processor 102 may adjust the data records to reflect the select desired time lags (step 410). For example, for a data record including a set of values of sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5}, if x_{5 }is current, and the desired time lags are four, three, two, and one for x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, and x_{4}, respectively, processor 102 may replace the value of x_{1 }with the value of x_{1 }with four time lags, replace the value of x_{2 }with the value of x_{2 }with three time lags, the value of x_{3 }with the value of x_{3 }with two time lags, and the value of x_{4 }with the value of x_{4 }with one time lags. That is, processor 102 may rearrange or adjust the data records such that the sensor readings x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}, and x_{5 }represent readings of the same sensed subject at the different stages of the sensor series. The adjusted data records may reflect more accurately the characteristics of the data records and may be further processed.
In certain embodiments, a product design, such as a medical application or a complex engine application, the data records may include a large number of input variables. A large number of input variables may significantly increase computational load of the product design system. Processor 102 may reduce the number of the input variables based on the characteristics of the input variables.
Processor 102 may obtain data records including a plurality of input variables (step 502). For example, processor 102 may obtain a total m number of data records each including variables x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, . . . , x_{n}, where m and n are integers. Further, processor 102 may then separate or partition the m data records into a predetermined k number of data groups or clusters (step 504).
Processor 102 may partition the data records by using any appropriate type of algorithm. For example, processor 102 may use a kmeans algorithm to partition the data records. Other algorithms may also be used.
A kmeans algorithm may cluster objects or data records into k partitions based on attributes of the objects or data records. The kmeans algorithm may start by partitioning the data records (data points) into k initial sets, either randomly or using some heuristic data. The kmeans algorithm may then calculate a mean point, or centroid, of each set, and construct a new partition by associating each point with the closest centroid. Further, the kmeans algorithm may recalculate the centroids for the new clusters. The kmeans algorithm may repeat the above steps until convergence, that is, the data points no longer switch clusters.
Processor 102 may also determine the number of groups or clusters based on any other appropriate method. For example, processor 102 may determine the number of the clusters based on a vfold cross validation method. Processor 102 may first select a small number of clusters and then incrementally add cluster centers until minimum gain from the next incremental cluster addition is below a threshold.
After grouping the data records, processor 102 may calculate a cluster center for each determined group of data records (step 506). Processor 102 may use any appropriate algorithm to calculate the cluster center. For example, processor 102 may calculate the cluster center based on Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance, or Chebyshev distance, etc.
Further, processor 102 may determine a distance between a data record and a center of each of the determined groups (step 508). For example, if a total number of five groups or clusters are used, processor 102 may determine five separate distances from a data record to the five center of the clusters, respectively.
After determining distances from data records to the centers of the determined groups, processor 102 may create a distance matrix (step 510). Each column of the distance matrix may represent each group or the center of each group, and each row of the distance matrix may represent a data record from the data records. Therefore, the distance matrix may include a total m number of rows and a total k number of columns, and each element of the matrix represent a distance between a data record and a center of a group.
After creating the distance matrix (step 510), processor 102 may replace the original data records with the distance matrix (step 512). That is, after being replaced, the data records may include the same number of records but may include the groups as input variables instead of variables x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, . . . , x_{n}. The total number of input variables may be significantly reduced, e.g., from n to k.
In certain embodiments, processor 102 may perform both the data adjusting process and the variable reduction process. For example, processor 102 may first perform the data adjusting process and then perform the variable reduction process to reduce the number of input variables with desired accuracy for reflecting the characteristics of the input variables.
Return to
The data records may include many input variables. In certain situations, for example, where the data records are obtained through experimental observations, the number of input variables may exceed the number of the data records and lead to sparse data scenarios. In these situations, the number of input variables may need to be reduced to create mathematical models within practical computational time limits and that contain enough degrees of freedom to map the relationship between inputs and outputs. In certain other situations, however, where the data records are computer generated using domain specific algorithms, there may be less of a risk that the number of input variables exceeds the number of data records. That is, in these situations, if the number of input variables exceeds the number of data records, more data records may be generated using the domain specific algorithms. Thus, for computer generated data records, the number of data records can be made to exceed, and often far exceed, the number of input variables. For these situations, the input parameters selected for use in step 206 may correspond to the entire set of input variables.
Where the number of input variables exceeds the number of data records, and it would not be practical or costeffective to generate additional data records, processor 102 may select input parameters at step 206 according to predetermined criteria. For example, processor 102 may choose input parameters by experimentation and/or expert opinions. Alternatively, in certain embodiments, processor 102 may select input parameters based on a Mahalanobis distance between a normal data set and an abnormal data set of the data records. The normal data set and abnormal data set may be defined by processor 102 by any suitable method. For example, the normal data set may include characteristic data associated with the input parameters that produce desired output parameters. On the other hand, the abnormal data set may include any characteristic data that may be out of tolerance or may need to be avoided. The normal data set and abnormal data set may be predefined by processor 102.
Mahalanobis distance may refer to a mathematical representation that may be used to measure data profiles based on correlations between parameters in a data set. Mahalanobis distance differs from Euclidean distance in that mahalanobis distance takes into account the correlations of the data set. Mahalanobis distance of a data set X (e.g., a multivariate vector) may be represented as
MD_{i}=(X_{i}−μ_{x})Σ^{−1}(X_{i}−μ_{x})^{1 } (1)
where μ_{x }is the mean of X and Σ^{−1 }is an inverse variancecovariance matrix of X. MD_{i }weighs the distance of a data point X_{i }from its mean μ_{x }such that observations that are on the same multivariate normal density contour will have the same distance. Such observations may be used to identify and select correlated parameters from separate data groups having different variances.
Processor 102 may select a desired subset of input parameters such that the mahalanobis distance between the normal data set and the abnormal data set is maximized or optimized. A genetic algorithm may be used by processor 102 to search the input parameters for the desired subset with the purpose of maximizing the mahalanobis distance. Processor 102 may select a candidate subset of the input parameters based on a predetermined criteria and calculate a mahalanobis distance MD_{normal }of the normal data set and a mahalanobis distance MD_{abnormal }of the abnormal data set. Processor 102 may also calculate the mahalanobis distance between the normal data set and the abnormal data (i.e., the deviation of the mahalanobis distance MD_{x}=MD_{normal}−MD_{normal}). Other types of deviations, however, may also be used.
Processor 102 may select the candidate subset of the input parameters if the genetic algorithm converges (i.e., the genetic algorithm finds the maximized or optimized mahalanobis distance between the normal data set and the abnormal data set corresponding to the candidate subset). If the genetic algorithm does not converge, a different candidate subset of the input parameters may be created for further searching. This searching process may continue until the genetic algorithm converges and a desired subset of the input parameters is selected.
After selecting input parameters, processor 102 may generate a computational model to build interrelationships between the input parameters and output parameters (step 208). Any appropriate type of neural network may be used to build the computational model. The type of neural network models used may include back propagation, feed forward models, cascaded neural networks, and/or hybrid neural networks, etc. Particular types or structures of the neural network used may depend on particular applications. Other types of models, such as linear system or nonlinear system models, etc., may also be used.
The neural network computational model may be trained by using selected data records. For example, the neural network computational model may include a relationship between output parameters (e.g., engine power, engine efficiency, engine vibration, etc.) and input parameters (e.g., cylinder wall thickness, cylinder wall material, cylinder bore, etc). The neural network computational model may be evaluated by predetermined criteria to determine whether the training is completed. The criteria may include desired ranges of accuracy, time, and/or number of training iterations, etc.
After the neural network has been trained (i.e., the computational model has initially been established based on the predetermined criteria), processor 102 may statistically validate the computational model (step 210). Statistical validation may refer to an analyzing process to compare outputs of the neural network computational model with actual outputs to determine the accuracy of the computational model. Part of the data records may be reserved for use in the validation process. Alternatively, processor 102 may generate simulation or test data for use in the validation process.
Once trained and validated, the computational model may be used to determine values of output parameters when provided with values of input parameters. Further, processor 102 may optimize the model by determining desired distributions of the input parameters based on relationships between the input parameters and desired distributions of the output parameters (step 212).
Processor 102 may analyze the relationships between distributions of the input parameters and desired distributions of the output parameters (e.g., design constraints provided to the model that may represent a state of compliance of the product design). Processor 102 may then run a simulation of the computational model to find statistical distributions for an individual input parameter. That is, processor 102 may separately determine a distribution (e.g., mean, standard variation, etc.) of the individual input parameter corresponding to the ranges of the output parameters representing a compliance state for the product. Processor 102 may then analyze and combine the desired distributions for all the individual input parameters to determined desired distributions and characteristics for the input parameters.
Alternatively, processor 102 may identify desired distributions of input parameters simultaneously to maximize the probability of obtaining desired outcomes (i.e., to maximize the probability that a certain product design is compliant with the desired requirements). In certain embodiments, processor 102 may simultaneously determine desired distributions of the input parameters based on zeta statistic. Zeta statistic may indicate a relationship between input parameters, their value ranges, and desired outcomes. Zeta statistic may be represented as
where
Processor 102 may identify a desired distribution of the input parameters such that the zeta statistic of the neural network computational model is maximized or optimized. A genetic algorithm may be used by processor 102 to search the desired distribution of input parameters with the purpose of maximizing the zeta statistic. Processor 102 may select a candidate set of input parameters with predetermined search ranges and run a simulation of the product design model to calculate the zeta statistic parameters based on the input parameters, the output parameters, and the neural network computational model. Processor 102 may obtain
Processor 102 may select the candidate set of values of input parameters if the genetic algorithm converges (i.e., the genetic algorithm finds the maximized or optimized zeta statistic of the product design model corresponding to the candidate set of input parameters). If the genetic algorithm does not converge, a different candidate set of values of input parameters may be created by the genetic algorithm for further searching. This searching process may continue until the genetic algorithm converges and a desired set of values of the input parameters is identified. Processor 102 may further determine desired distributions (e.g., mean and standard deviations) of input parameters based on the desired set of values of input parameters.
After the product design model has been optimized (step 212), processor 102 may define a valid input space (step 214) representative of an optimized design of the product. This valid input space may represent the nominal values and corresponding statistical distributions for each of the selected input parameters. To implement the design of the product, values for the input parameters selected within the valid input space would maximize the probability of achieving a compliance state according to the constraints provided to the model.
Once the valid input space has been determined, this information may be provided to display 112. Along with the input space information, the nominal values of the corresponding output parameters and the associated distributions may also be supplied to display 112. Displaying this information conveys to the product design engineer the ranges of values for the selected input parameters that are consistent with the optimized product design. This information also enables the engineer to determine the probability of compliance of any one of or all of the output parameters in the optimized product design.
While the processor 102 may be configured to provide an optimized product design based on the interrelationships between the selected input parameters and the output parameters and on the selected output constraints, the model allows for additional input by the product design engineer. Specifically, at step 218, the engineer is allowed to determine if the optimized product design generated by processor 102 represents the desired final design. If the answer is yes (step 218, yes), then the process ends. If the answer is no (step 218, no) the engineer can generate a design alternative (step 220).
To generate a design alternative, the engineer can vary any of the values of the input parameters or the distributions associated with the input parameters. The changed values may be supplied back to the simulation portion of the model for reoptimization. Based on the changed values, the model will display updated values and distributions for the output parameters changed as a result of the change to the input parameters. From the updated information, the engineer can determine how the alternative product design impacts the probability of compliance. This process can continue until the engineer decides on a final product design. It should be noted that alternative designs may also be generated by varying the values or distributions for the output parameters or by defining different or additional product design constraints.
Display 112 may also be used to display statistical information relating to the performance of the product design model. For example, distributions for the input parameters and the output parameters may be calculated based on the original data records. These distributions may represent an actual statistical space that can be compared with a predicted statistical space generated by the model. Overlap of the actual statistical space with the predicted statistical space may indicate that the model is functioning as expected.
The disclosed systems and methods may efficiently provide optimized product designs for any type of product that can be modeled by computer. Based on the disclosed system, complex interrelationships may be analyzed during the generation of computational models to optimize the models by identifying distributions of input parameters to the models to obtain desired outputs. The robustness and accuracy of product designs may be significantly improved by using the disclosed systems and methods.
The efficiency of designing a product may also be improved using the disclosed systems and methods. For example, the disclosed zeta statistic approach yields knowledge of how variation in the input parameters translates to variation in the output parameters. Thus, by defining the interrelationships between the input parameters and the output parameters in a system, the disclosed product design system can operate based on a proxy concept. That is, because these interrelationships are known and modeled, there is no need to use domain specific algorithm tools each time the model wishes to explore the effects of a variation in value or distribution of an input parameter or output parameter. Thus, unlike traditional systems that must pass repeatedly pass through slow simulations as part of a design optimization process, the disclosed modeling system takes advantage of wellvalidated models (e.g., neural network models) in place of slow simulations to more rapidly determine an optimized product design solution.
The disclosed product design system can significantly reduce the cost to manufacture a product. Based on the statistical output generated by the model, the model can indicate the ranges of input parameter values that can be used to achieve a compliance state. The product design engineer can exploit this information to vary certain input parameter values without significantly affecting the compliance state of the product design. That is, the manufacturing constraints for a particular product design may be made less restrictive without affecting (or at least significantly affecting) the overall compliance state of the design. Relaxing the manufacturing design constraints can simplify the manufacturing process for the product, which can lead to manufacturing cost savings. If desired, product cost can be calculated explicitly and included in the output parameters under optimization.
The disclosed product design system can also enable a product design engineer to explore “what if” scenarios based on the optimized model. Because the interrelationships between input parameters and output parameters are known and understood by the model, the product designer can generate alternative designs based on the optimized product design to determine how one or more individual changes will affect the probability of compliance. While these design alternatives may move away from the optimized product design solution, this feature of the product design system can enable a product designer to adjust the design based on experience. Specifically, the product designer may recognize areas in the optimized model where certain manufacturing constraints may be relaxed to provide a cost savings, for example. By exploring the effect of the alternative design on product compliance probability, the designer can determine whether the potential cost savings of the alternative design would outweigh a potential reduction in probability of compliance.
The disclosed product design system can also provide various data preprocessing mechanisms to improve the accuracy of the data records, and/or to reduce a total number of the input variables without losing characteristics of the data records.
The disclosed product design system may have several other advantages. For example, the use of genetic algorithms at various stages in the model avoids the need for a product designer to define the step size for variable changes. Further, the model has no limit to the number of dimensions that can be simultaneously optimized and searched.
Other embodiments, features, aspects, and principles of the disclosed exemplary systems will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be implemented in various environments and systems.