METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING LEGAL MATTERS

• US 20090037247A1
• Filed: 03/15/2007
• Published: 02/05/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/17/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: ITIP Development, LLC
• Original Assignee: ITIP Development, LLC
• Inventors: Quinn, Thomas Frederick
• Application Number:
  US12/282,679
• Publication Number:
  US 20090037247A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/04 Billing or invoicing
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

This invention generally relates to a system and method for managing legal services as well as legal matters, assets, expenses and/or invoices and more particularly relates to a computer assisted system that stores, organizes and/or performs operations on data relating to legal services, legal matters, assets, costs, invoices and the like allowing a user of the system to search, sort, report, track, docket, sum, average and/or perform other operations on this data to generate legal service performance review reports, invoice review reports and/or various expense reports as well as calculate accounts payable, calculate inter-company charges and/or otherwise may manage the same by identifying internal and legal service provider inefficiencies and by identifying unnecessary and excessively priced services and expenses.

Claims

1. A database system for managing intellectual property matters and associated legal costs comprising:

an intellectual property matter management portion of said database system, said matter management portion adapted to store, organize and docket intellectual property matter data, and to calculate payments relating to said intellectual property matters, and an invoice management portion of said database system in relational communication with said matter management portion of said database system, said invoice management portion adapted to receive and perform analysis on invoice data relating to said intellectual property matter data to determine if charges for a legal service relating to one of said intellectual property matters have exceeded a cost target for said legal service, said database system adapted to provide reports that include selected intellectual property matter data and selected invoice data, which both relate to said legal service.

2. The database system of claim 1 wherein said invoice management portion is adapted to perform statistical analysis on said charges relating to a plurality of said intellectual property matters for selected attorneys, whereby said charges by said selected attorneys can be compared.

3. The database system of claim 1 wherein a user of said database system performs a review of said reports and enters input from said review into said database system.

4. The database system of claim 1 wherein said database system provides selected invoice data and selected intellectual property matter data relating thereto in an electronic format that can be imported into an accounting software system for performing accounting functions on said data, said accounting functions including at least one function from a group comprising calculation of check requests, calculation of inter-company charges, calculation of payments in foreign currency and internal auditing of said charges.

5. The database system of claim 1 wherein said intellectual property matter data includes budget data that identifies a budget within said business that is responsible for paying said charges relating to said intellectual property matter.

6. The database system of claim 1 wherein said database system performs said analysis on invoice data relating to said intellectual property matter data to determine if there are errors or violations of billing guidelines in said invoice data.

8. The system of claim 6 wherein said standard includes at least one standard from a group comprising a cost target for one of said service types that applies to all said legal matters, a cost target for a one of said service types that applies to one of said legal matters and a cost target for all of said service types that applies to one of said legal matters.

9. The system of claim 6 wherein said final disposition of the patent application is defined as a patent application where all said services relating to said patent application processing service type are completed such that said patent application can be described as one of a group comprising an issued United States patent including any post issuance corrections, a lapsed United States provisional application, a granted utility patent outside the United States where any applicable opposition proceedings have been completed, a completed European patent application immediately prior to going national into various contracting European Patent Office countries, a national application that originated from the European Patent Office where all translations and proceedings before the national patent office are completed, and a PCT patent application immediately prior to going national into various contracting PCT countries.

10. The system of claim 6 wherein said system is adapted to perform a statistical analysis on said sums for said service types performed by said legal service providers, said statistical analysis including at least one calculation from the group comprising an average sum, a high sum, a low sum, a median sum, a standard deviation for said sums, a count of sums, an average sum per page in a patent specification, an average sum per number of claims in a patent, and an average sum per sheet of drawings in a patent.

11. The system of claim 6 wherein said at least one patent application preparation service type is a plurality of said service types, each of which represent different levels of expense in preparing the patent application.

13. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said method further comprises the step of testing said invoice data for incorrect matter reference numbers, countries, service types and expense types that do not correctly relate to legal matter data and reporting said incorrect matter reference numbers, countries, service types and expense types.

14. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said method further comprises the step comparing said sum for a standard service type against a standard cost target and said sum for a unique service type against a unique cost target.

15. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said method further comprises the step of said analytical user reviewing the applicable legal service provider work quality relating to the selected legal matter and invoice data to identify and report legal service provider inefficiencies.

16. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said method further comprises the step of said analytical user reviewing the applicable legal service provider invoices relating to the selected legal matter and invoice data to identify and report legal service provider billing issues.

17. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said step of using the database system to compile reports that summarize said selected legal matter and invoice data and said related comments and analysis is completed on a monthly basis for all legal service provider invoices received on said monthly basis.

18. The computer assisted method of claim 17 wherein said step further comprises the step of providing said reports on said monthly basis with historical comments and analysis, previously entered into the database system in a prior month, said historical comments and analysis relating to said selected legal matter and invoice data.

19. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said step of using the database system to compile reports that summarize said selected legal matter and invoice data and said related comments and analysis is compiled for a selected legal service provider over a selected period of time for generating performance review reports on said selected legal service provider.

20. The computer assisted method of claim 10 wherein said method further comprises the step of using said database system to test said invoice data, said test including at least one test from a group comprising testing for too many attorney hours in one day, testing for an unauthorized attorney, testing for expenses under an unauthorized legal matter, testing for services under an unauthorized legal matter, testing for duplicate expense entries, testing for duplicate attorney time entries, testing for the invoice total to equal all individual expense and attorney time entries, testing for each attorney time entry to equal the attorney rate multiplied by the attorney time, testing for attorney time entries occurring after a legal matter has been stopped, testing for expense entries occurring after a legal matter has been stopped, testing for an attorney, testing for charges by an attorney that has been terminated, testing for charges by a non-team attorney, testing for a first charge on a legal matter occurring a period of time after said legal matter was initiated and testing for correct exchange rates on foreign currency.

7. A system for comparing and managing intellectual property costs comprising:

a database adapted to store, relate and analyze business legal matter data relating to legal matters and legal service provider invoice data relating to fees and expenses, said system relates portions of said legal matter data and portions of said invoice data to a plurality of service types, said service types comprising at least one patent application preparation service type and at least one patent application processing service type, said at least one patent application preparation service type is defined to include all services relating to preparing a patent application for filing and said at least one patent application processing service type is defined to include all services relating to filing and processing said patent application through a final disposition of the patent application, said system calculates a sum of all said fees and expenses for one said service type relating to one of said legal matters and compares said sum to a standard for said one service type such that when said sum exceeds said service type standard, said system identifies selected legal matter data and invoice data.

12. A computer assisted method for managing legal services and all associated costs comprising the steps of:

a. entering service types and cost targets for said service types into a database system;

b. entering legal matter data into said database system relating to a plurality of legal matters;

c. entering legal service provider invoice data relating to said service types and said legal matter data into the database system, said invoice data including charge data;

d. using said database system to determine if said invoice data has been correctly related to said legal matter data and said service types;

e. correcting any said invoice data that is identified by said determination;

f. using said database system to sum all said charge data relating to one of said service types, which relates to one of said legal matters;

g. using said database system to compare said sum to said cost target for said one service type;

h. using said database system to report selected legal matter data and selected invoice data relating to any said sum that exceeds said cost target for said one service type;

i. providing legal service providers with at least a portion of said selected legal matter and invoice data such that said legal service providers can provide comments on said selected data;

j. entering legal service provider comments relating to said selected legal matter and invoice data into said database system;

k. providing an analytical user of said database system with at least a portion of said related comments and relevant legal matter and invoice data such that said analytical user can provide analysis relating to said selected legal matter and invoice data and said related comments;

l. entering analytical user analysis relating to said selected legal matter and invoice data into said database system; and

m. using the database system to compile reports that summarize said selected legal matter and invoice data, said related comments and said related analysis.