System and Method for Authenticating Content

• US 20090037975A1
• Filed: 05/27/2008
• Published: 02/05/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 07/30/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: BayTSP, Inc. (MultiChoice Group Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: BayTSP, Inc. (MultiChoice Group Ltd.)
• Inventors: Ishikawa, Mark M., Low, Lawrence, Hill, Travis
• Application Number:
  US12/127,541
• Publication Number:
  US 20090037975A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/105 Arrangements for software license management or administration, e.g. for managing licenses at corporate level

Abstract

A system for authenticating content and methods for making and using same. The content authentication system advantageously facilitates recognition of known content, control over use of the known content, and knowledge accumulation regarding the use of known content for monetization models. The recognition of the suspect content preferably includes an analysis of known content recognition data associated with the known content and suspect content recognition data associated with the suspect content. A correlation between the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data is found, and the suspect content is analyzed in light of the correlation and known content rules associated with the known content. Thereby, the content authentication system can determine whether to approve action for the suspect content. The content authentication system enables selected known content information to be shared among known content right holders and hosting websites.

Claims

1. A method for determining whether to approve suspect content, comprising:

receiving the suspect content;

performing content recognition on the suspect content to generate suspect content data for the suspect content;

comparing the suspect content data with comparable known content data, the known content data being representative of known content and being associated with one or more known content rules;

finding a correlation between the suspect content data and the known content data;

deciding whether to approve an action for the suspect content based upon said correlation and at least one of the known content rules;

approving the action for the suspect content if the suspect content complies with each of said at least one of the known content rules; and

determining that the suspect content is a misappropriation of the known content if the suspect content does not comply with one or more of said at least one of the known content rules.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said receiving the suspect content includes at least one of recognizing the suspect content and acknowledging the suspect content.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said receiving the suspect content comprises receiving inquired content.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the suspect content data comprises inquired content data for the inquired content.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said performing content recognition on the suspect content includes at least one of detecting the suspect content data for the suspect content, gathering the suspect content data for the suspect content, creating the suspect content data for the suspect content, applying a content protection technology to the suspect content, performing a content protection technique for identifying the suspect content, and performing a content recognition technique for identifying the suspect content.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether the suspect content is configured as reconfigured suspect content that complies with each of said at least one of the known content rules; and

if the suspect content can be configured to comply with each of said at least one of the known content rules,

configuring the suspect content to form the reconfigured suspect content; and

approving the action for the reconfigured suspect content.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said configuring the suspect content includes at least one of altering the suspect content, replacing the suspect content, and providing a license for the known content.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said finding said correlation between the suspect content data and the known content data includes finding a match between the suspect content data and the known content data.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising, if suspect content data and known content data are not comparable,

performing a second content recognition on the suspect content to generate a second suspect content data for the suspect content, the second suspect content data being comparable with the known content data;

comparing the second suspect content data with the known content data;

finding a correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data; and

deciding whether to approve the action for the second suspect content based upon said correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data and said at least one of the known content rules.

10. A method for authenticating content, comprising:

applying a content recognition technology to known content to generate known content data for the known content, the known content data being associated with at least one known content rule;

comparing the known content data with comparable suspect content data that is representative of suspect content;

determining a correlation between the known content data and the suspect content data;

deciding whether to approve an action for the suspect content based on said determining the correlation and upon a selected known content rule; and

approving the action for the suspect content if the suspect content complies with said selected known content rule.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising determining that the suspect content is a misappropriation of the known content if the suspect content does not comply with said selected known content rule.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein said comparing the known content data with the comparable suspect content data includes comparing the known content data with inquired content data that is representative of inquired content.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein said applying said content recognition to the known content includes at least one of detecting the known content data for the known content, gathering the known content data for the known content, creating the known content data for the known content, applying a content protection technology to the known content, applying a content protection technique for identifying the known content, and applying a content recognition technique for identifying the known content.

14. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

determining whether the suspect content can be configured as reconfigured suspect content that complies with said selected known content rule; and

if the suspect content can be configured to comply with said selected known content rule,

configuring the suspect content to form the reconfigured suspect content; and

approving the action for the reconfigured suspect content.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said configuring the suspect content includes at least one of altering the suspect content, replacing the suspect content, and providing a license for the known content.

16. A method for identifying content, comprising:

receiving known content data associated with at least one known content rule, the known content data being generated by applying a content recognition technology to known content;

receiving suspect content data, the suspect content data being generated by applying the content recognition technology to suspect content;

comparing the known content data with the suspect content data;

determining a correlation between the known content data and the suspect content data;

applying said determining the correlation and one or more selected known content rules to decide whether to approve action for suspect content;

approving the action for the suspect content if the suspect content complies with said selected known content rules; and

determining that the suspect content has not been authorized by an owner of the known content if the suspect content does not comply with said selected known content rules.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein receiving the known content data includes at least one of detecting the known content data, recognizing the known content data, and acknowledging the known content data.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein receiving the suspect content data includes at least one of detecting the suspect content data, recognizing the suspect content data, acknowledging the suspect content data and receiving inquired content data that is representative of inquired content.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein said applying said content recognition technology to the known content and the suspect content includes at least one of applying a content protection technology to the known content and the suspect content, applying a content protection technique for identifying the known content and the suspect content, and applying a content recognition technique for identifying the to the known content and the suspect content.

20. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

determining whether the suspect content can be configured as reconfigured suspect content that complies with said with said selected known content rules; and

if the suspect content can be configured to comply with said selected known content rules,

configuring the suspect content to form the reconfigured suspect content; and

approving the action for the reconfigured suspect content.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein said configuring the suspect content includes at least one of altering the suspect content, replacing the suspect content, and providing a license for the known content.

22. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

determining whether the suspect content data and the known content data are comparable; and

if the suspect content data and the known content data are not comparable,

applying a second content recognition on the known content to generate a second known content data for the known content, the second known content data being comparable with the suspect content data;

determining a correlation between the second known content data and the suspect content data; and

applying said determining the correlation between the second known content data and the suspect content data and said selected known content rules to decide whether to approve the action for suspect content.

23. A system for authenticating content, comprising:

a data application system that processes known content associated with at least one known content rule;

a content recognition technology generator that is configured for communication with said data application system, said content recognition technology generator generating known content recognition data associated with the known content, the known content recognition data being comparable to suspect content recognition data associated with suspect content;

a database system that is configured for communication with said data application system and that stores content recognition data; and

a secured communication system that is configured for communication with said data application system and that determines whether a correlation exists between the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data, said secured communication system determining whether the suspect content complies with each of said at least one known content rule if the correlation between the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data exists,

wherein action for the suspect content is determined to be authorized if the suspect content complies with each of said at least one known content rule.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the action for the suspect content is determined not to be authorized if the suspect content does not comply with each of said at least one known content rule.

25. The system of claim 23, further comprising a second content recognition technology generator that is configured for communication with said data application system, said content recognition technology generator generating the suspect content recognition data associated with the suspect content.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein said second content recognition technology generator is at least partially integrated with said content recognition technology generator.

27. The system of claim 23, wherein the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data each include content protection technology data.

28. The system of claim 23, wherein said content recognition technology generator applies at least one of a content protection technique and a content recognition technique to generate the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data.

29. The system of claim 23, further comprising a second content recognition technology generator that is configured for communication with said data application system and that generates second known content recognition data associated with the known content, the second known content recognition data being comparable to the suspect content recognition data, wherein said secured communication system determines whether a correlation exists between the second known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data.

30. The system of claim 23, further comprising a second content recognition technology generator that is configured for communication with said data application system and that generates second suspect content recognition data associated with suspect content, the second suspect content recognition data being comparable to the known content recognition data, wherein said secured communication system determines whether a correlation exists between the known content recognition data and the second suspect content recognition data.

31. The system of claim 23, wherein said content recognition technology generator provides at least one of the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data to said data application system.

32. The system of claim 23, said content recognition technology generator communicates with said database system.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein said content recognition technology generator provides at least one of the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data to said database system.

34. The system of claim 23, wherein said data application system provides at least one of the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data to said database system.

35. The system of claim 23, wherein said data application system provides at least one of the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data to said database system.

36. The system of claim 23, wherein said data application system provides at least one of said at least one known content rule and metadata associated with the known content to said database system.

37. The system of claim 23, wherein said secured communication system determines whether a match exists between the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data.

38. The system of claim 23, further comprising a notification system that provides known content information to an owner of the known content.

39. A system for authenticating content, comprising:

a data application system that processes suspect content;

a content recognition generator that generates content recognition data; and

a decision engine that determines whether a correlation exists between suspect content recognition data associated with the suspect content and comparable known content recognition data associated with known content, said decision engine determines whether the suspect content complies with a selected known content rule associated with the known content if said correlation between the suspect content recognition data and the known content recognition data exists,

wherein action for the suspect content is determined to be authorized if the suspect content complies with the known content rule.

40. The system of claim 39, wherein the action for the suspect content is determined not to be authorized if the suspect content does not comply with each of said at least one known content rule.

41. The system of claim 39, wherein said content recognition generator and said decision engine each are in communication with said data application system.

42. The system of claim 39, further comprising a notification system that sends known content information to a holder of the known content.

43. The system of claim 39, further comprising a database system that is configured to communicate with said data application system and that stores content recognition data.

44. The system of claim 43, wherein said content recognition generator provides the content recognition data to said database system.

45. The system of claim 43, wherein said data application system provides the content recognition data to said database system.

46. The system of claim 43, wherein said data application system provides metadata associated with suspect content to said database system.

47. A content identification platform for authenticating content, comprising:

a DarkNet system that receives and stores original source content in a predetermined digital form and that includes a content recognition system that builds a reference identifier for the original source content; and

a ProductionNet system that receives said reference identifier from said DarkNet system and that matches incoming candidate files with said reference identifier based upon at least one predefined matching criteria.

48. The content identification platform of claim 47, wherein said content recognition system includes at least one of a fingerprinting technology system, a watermarking technology system, a content protection technology system, a content protection system, and a content recognition system.

49. The content identification platform of claim 47, wherein said original source content includes known content and wherein said reference identifier includes known content data.

50. The content identification platform of claim 47, wherein said content recognition system builds a candidate file reference identifier for a selected candidate file, said candidate file reference identifier being suitable for comparison with the reference identifier of the original source content.

51. The content identification platform of claim 47, wherein said at least one predefined matching criteria is defined by a right holder of the original source content.

52. The content identification system of claim 47, wherein the DarkNet system is not accessible via an external network.

53. The content identification system of claim 47, wherein the DarkNet system comprises a database system that stores said reference identifier.

54. The content identification system of claim 53, wherein the ProductionNet system includes a database system that receives the reference identifier stored in said database system of said DarkNet system via a secure transfer.

55. The content identification system of claim 54, wherein the secure transfer comprises a physical transfer of a reference identifier file.

56. The content identification system of claim 54, wherein the ProductionNet system associates a secret asset identifier with the reference identifier and includes a content management system that maintains an association between the reference identifier and the secret asset identifier.

57. The content identification platform of claim 56, wherein the secret asset identifier is utilized to identify the original source content.

58. The content identification platform of claim 56, wherein the secret asset identifier is utilized to identify at least one predefined matching criteria, the predefined matching criteria being associated with the original source content.

59. The content identification system of claim 47, wherein the DarkNet system includes a conversion-management system that manages construction of the reference identifier for the original source content.

60. The content identification system of claim 59, wherein the conversion-management system determines when to build the reference identifier.

61. The content identification system of claim 47, wherein the DarkNet system associates descriptive information with the original source content.

62. The content identification platform of claim 47, further comprising a decision engine that utilizes one or more business rules associated with the original source content to perform a predetermined action regarding the matched candidate file.

63. The content identification platform of claim 62, wherein the decision engine communicates information regarding the matched candidate file to a manager for the original source content via a notification system.

64. The content identification platform of claim 62, wherein the information includes at least one of utilization reporting, royalty reporting, and metadata for the candidate file.

65. The content identification platform of claim 64, wherein the metadata includes a candidate file name and a candidate file location of the candidate file.

66. The content identification platform of claim 62, wherein the decision engine provides original source information regarding the original source content to a host of the candidate file.

67. The content identification platform of claim 66, wherein the original source information includes time coded metadata.

68. The content identification platform of claim 47, further comprising a communication system that communicates with one or more websites.

69. The content identification platform of claim 68, wherein said communication system receives a reference identifier for a selected candidate file from a selected website.

70. The content identification platform of claim 68, further comprising a website crawler that searches a selected website to locate a selected candidate file.

71. The content identification platform of claim 68, further comprising a link follower that identifies an original hosting website of a selected candidate file located on at least one of the websites.

72. A system for authenticating content, comprising:

a database system that stores known content data and known content data information associated with the known content data; and

a decision engine that determines whether a correlation exists between known content data and suspect content data and, if said correlation exists, determines whether to approve action for the suspect content if the suspect content complies with the selected known content data information,

wherein the known content data and the suspect content data are generated by applying a content recognition technology to known content and suspect content, respectively.

73. The system of claim 72, wherein the known content data information includes at least one of a business rule and metadata associated with the known content.

74. The system of claim 72, wherein the database system receives the known content data from a DarkNet system.

75. The system of claim 72, wherein said database system receives the known content data via a secure transmission system.

76. The system of claim 72, further comprising a content management system, wherein said database system associates the known content data with a secret asset identifier, and wherein said content management system maintains an association between the known content data and the secret asset identifier.

77. The system of claim 76, wherein the secret asset identifier is utilized identify at least one of the original source content and the known content data information.

78. The system of claim 72, wherein said decision engine provides reporting information regarding said correlation between the known content data and the suspect content data to a manager of the known content.

79. The system of claim 78, wherein the reporting information is communicated to the manager of the known content via a notification system.

80. The system of claim 78, wherein the reporting information includes at least one of utilization reporting, royalty reporting, and metadata for the suspect content.

81. The system of claim 80, wherein the metadata includes a suspect content file name and a suspect content file location associated with the suspect content.

82. The system of claim 72, wherein said decision engine provides the known content data information to a host system of one or more candidate files.

83. The system of claim 82, wherein the known content data information includes time coded metadata.

84. The system of claim 72, further comprising a website crawler that searches a selected website to locate the suspect content.

85. The system of claim 84, further comprising a link follower that identifies the original hosting website of the suspect content.

86. A content authentication platform by identifying content, comprising:

a ProductionNet system that receives known content recognition data and a known content rule each associated with known content, the content recognition data being generated by applying a content recognition technology to the known content; and

a decision engine that finds a correlation between the known content recognition data and suspect content recognition data associated with a suspect content and applies said correlation between the known content recognition data and the suspect content recognition data to determine whether to approve action for the suspect content based on the known content rule, the suspect content recognition data being generated by applying the content recognition technology to the suspect content,

wherein said decision engine determines that the known content has been misappropriated if the suspect content does not comply with the known content rule.

87. The content authentication platform of claim 86, wherein the ProductionNet system associates a secret asset identifier with the known content recognition data and includes a content management system that maintains an association between the known content recognition data and the secret asset identifier.

88. The content identification platform of claim 87, wherein the secret asset identifier identifies the original source content.

89. The content identification platform of claim 86, wherein said decision engine provides reporting information regarding the suspect content data to a manager of the known content.

90. The content authentication platform of claim 86, wherein the reporting information is communicated to the manager of the known content via a notification system.

91. The content authentication platform of claim 86, wherein the reporting information includes at least one of utilization reporting, royalty reporting, and metadata for the suspect content.

92. The content authentication platform of claim 91, wherein the metadata includes a suspect content file name and a suspect content file location associated with the suspect content.

93. The content identification platform of claim 86, further comprising a website crawler that searches a selected website to locate a selected candidate file.

94. The content identification platform of claim 93, further comprising a link follower that identifies an original hosting website of the selected candidate file.

95. A computer program product suitable for storage on a physical storage medium and having computer-readable instructions, the computer program product comprising:

an instruction that receives the suspect content;

an instruction that performs content recognition on suspect content to generate suspect content data for the suspect content;

an instruction that compares the suspect content data with comparable known content data that is representative of known content and that is associated with at one or more known content rules;

an instruction that finds a correlation between the suspect content data and the known content data; and

an instruction that decides whether to approve action for the suspect content based upon said correlation between the suspect content data and the known content data and at least one selected known content rule,

wherein action for the suspect content is determined to be authorized if the suspect content complies with said at least one selected known content rule, and

wherein the suspect content is determined to be a misappropriation of the known content if the suspect content does not comply with one or more of said at least one of the known content rules.

96. The computer program product of claim 95, wherein said instruction that receives the suspect content includes at least one of an instruction that recognizes the suspect content, an instruction that acknowledges the suspect content, and an instruction that receives inquired content.

97. The computer program product of claim 95, wherein said instruction that performs said content recognition on the suspect content includes at least one of an instruction that detects the suspect content data for the suspect content, an instruction that gathers the suspect content data for the suspect content, an instruction that creates the suspect content data for the suspect content, an instruction that applies a content protection technology to the suspect content, an instruction that applies a content protection technique to identify the suspect content, and an instruction that applies a content recognition technique to identify the suspect content.

98. The computer program product of claim 95, further comprising:

an instruction that determines whether the suspect content can be configured as reconfigured suspect content that complies with each of said at least one selected known content rule; and

an instruction that configures the suspect content to form the reconfigured suspect content and an instruction that approves the action for the reconfigured suspect content each if the suspect content can be configured to comply with each of said at least one selected known content rule.

99. The computer program product of claim 95, wherein said instruction that configures the suspect content includes at least one of an instruction that alters the suspect content and an instruction that replaces the suspect content, and an instruction that provides a license for the known content.

100. The computer program product of claim 95,

an instruction that performs a second content recognition on the suspect content to generate a second suspect content data for the suspect content if suspect content data and known content data are not comparable, the second suspect content data being comparable with the known content data;

an instruction that compares the second suspect content data with the known content data;

an instruction that finds a correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data; and

an instruction that decides whether to approve the action for the second suspect content based upon said correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data and said at least one of the known content rules.

101. A computer program product suitable for storage on a physical storage medium and having computer-readable instructions, the computer program product comprising:

an instruction that applies a content recognition technology to known content to generate known content data for the known content, the known content data being associated with at least one known content rule;

an instruction that compares the known content data with comparable suspect content data that is representative of suspect content;

an instruction that determines a correlation between the known content data and the suspect content data; and

an instruction that decides whether to approve action for the suspect content based on said correlation and a selected known content rule,

wherein the action for the suspect content is determined to be authorized if the suspect content complies with said at least one selected known content rule.

102. The computer program product of claim 101, further comprising an instruction that determines that the action for the suspect content is determined not to be authorized if the suspect content does not comply with each of said at least one known content rule.

103. The computer program product of claim 101, wherein said instruction that applies said content recognition technology to the known content includes at least one of an instruction that detects the known content data for the known content, an instruction that gathers the known content data for the known content, an instruction that creates the known content data for the known content, an instruction that applies a content protection technology to the known content, an instruction that applies a content protection technique to identify the known content, and an instruction that applies a content recognition technique to identify the known content.

104. The computer program product of claim 101, further comprising:

an instruction that determines whether the suspect content can be configured as reconfigured suspect content that complies with each of said at least one of the known content rules; and

an instruction that configures the suspect content to form the reconfigured suspect content and an instruction that approves the action for the reconfigured suspect content each if the suspect content can be configured to comply with each of said at least one of the known content rules.

105. The computer program product of claim 101, wherein said instruction that configures the suspect content includes at least one of an instruction that alters the suspect content and an instruction that replaces the suspect content, and an instruction that provides a license for the known content.

106. The computer program product of claim 101,

an instruction that performs a second content recognition on the suspect content to generate a second suspect content data for the suspect content if suspect content data and known content data are not comparable, the second suspect content data being comparable with the known content data;

an instruction that compares the second suspect content data with the known content data;

an instruction that determines a correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data; and

an instruction that decides whether to approve the action for the second suspect content based upon said correlation between the second suspect content data and the known content data and said at least one of the known content rules.