METHOD APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR VISUALIZATION OF PROBABILISTIC MODELS

• US 20090070158A1
• Filed: 08/02/2005
• Published: 03/12/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 08/02/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Schlumberger NV)
• Original Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Schlumberger NV)
• Inventors: Virine, Lev, McVean, Jason
• Application Number:
  US11/632,003
• Publication Number:
  US 20090070158A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0635 Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method, apparatus, computer system and a program storage device for modeling a business process to assess risk is provided. A preferred embodiment of the method includes the steps of: (a) creating a high level model for the business process, (b) modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process; and (c) testing the model; wherein one or more views are used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c); and wherein the pattern technique of identifying and visualizing uncertainty is used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c), in increasing detail at each successive step.

Claims

1. A method of modeling a business process to assess risk, comprising the steps of:

a) creating a high level model for the business process,

b) modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process; and

c) testing the model;

wherein one or more views are used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c);

and wherein the pattern technique of identifying and visualizing uncertainty is used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c), in increasing detail at each successive step.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein at least a second pattern technique is used during at least one of steps (a), (b) and (c) of the process.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of consolidating the model.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of using one or more tools from a decision toolbox with the model created.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a conceptual view.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a data source definition view.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a workflow view.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a domain model view.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation diagram.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the calculation diagram has one or more layers.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

,

v) generating a user interface form.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the user interface form comprises a dashboard.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation script.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process by using a calculation script is performed by also using a domain script.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process by using a calculation script is performed by also using a calculation diagram.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using one or more sensitivity charts.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using a testing process diagram.

18. The method of claim 2 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a conceptual view.

19. The method of claim 2 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a data source definition view.

20. The method of claim 2 wherein the step a) of creating the high level model for the business process is performed using a workflow view.

21. The method of claim 2 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a domain model.

22. The method of claim 2 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation diagram.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the calculation diagram has one or more layers.

24. The method of claim 22 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

v) generating a user interface form.

25. The method of claim 2 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation script.

26. The method of claim 2 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using one or more sensitivity charts.

27. The method of claim 2 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using a testing process diagram.

28. The method of claim 4 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a sensitivity analysis visual tool.

29. The method of claim 4 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a decision analysis tool.

30. The method of claim 29 wherein the decision analysis tool is a decision tree.

31. The method of claim 4 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a Monte Carlo simulation.

32. The method of claim 4 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a discrete simulation visualization.

33. The method of claim 2 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes decoupling.

34. The method of claim 2 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes encapsulation.

35. The method of claim 2 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes a user workflow visualization.

36. The method of claim 2 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes a multi-layer representation of calculation logic.

37. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for creating a model of a business process, said method steps comprising:

a) creating a high level model for the business process,

b) modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process; and

c) testing the model;

wherein one or more views are used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c); and

wherein a pattern technique of identifying and visualizing uncertainty is used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c), in increasing detail at each successive step.

38. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein at least a second pattern technique is used during at least one step of the process.

39. The program storage device of claim 37, wherein the method steps further comprise the step of consolidating the model.

40. The program storage device of claim 37, wherein the method steps further comprise the step of using one or more tools from a decision toolbox with the model created.

41. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a conceptual view.

42. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a data source definition view.

43. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a workflow view.

44. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a domain model.

45. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation diagram.

46. The program storage device of claim 45 wherein the calculation diagram used has one or more layers.

47. The program storage device of claim 45 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

v) generating a user interface form.

48. The program storage device of claim 47 wherein the user interface form comprises a dashboard.

49. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation script.

50. The program storage device of claim 49 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process by using a calculation script is performed by also using a domain script.

51. The program storage device of claim 49 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process by using a calculation script is performed by also using a calculation diagram.

52. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using one or more sensitivity charts.

53. The program storage device of claim 37 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using a testing process diagram.

54. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a conceptual view.

55. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a data source definition view.

56. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step a) of creating a high level model for the business process is performed using a workflow view.

57. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a domain model.

58. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step b) creating a second model for a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation diagram.

59. The program storage device of claim 58 wherein the calculation diagram used has one or more layers.

60. The program storage device of claim 58 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

v) generating a user interface form.

61. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation script.

62. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using one or more sensitivity charts.

63. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using a testing process diagram.

64. The program storage device of claim 40 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a sensitivity analysis visual tool.

65. The program storage device of claim 40 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a decision analysis tool.

66. The program storage device of claim 65 wherein the decision analysis tool is a decision tree.

67. The program storage device of claim 40 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a Monte Carlo simulation.

68. The program storage device of claim 40 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox used is a discrete simulation visualization.

69. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes decoupling.

70. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes encapsulation.

71. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes a user workflow visualization.

72. The program storage device of claim 38 wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes a multi-layer representation of calculation logic.

109. The program storage device of claim 55 wherein the step b) of modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process is performed using a calculation diagram, wherein the step c) of testing the model is performed using a testing process diagram and wherein the second pattern technique used during at least one step in the process includes decoupling.

73. An apparatus for modeling a business process comprising:

a) a first means for creating a high level model for the business process,

b) a second means for modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process; and

c) a testing means for testing the model;

wherein one or more views are used by the first means, the second means and the testing means; and

wherein the first means, the second means and the third means each use a pattern technique to identify and visualize uncertainty and wherein the second means is capable of identifying and visualizing uncertainty in greater detail than the first means, and the testing means is capable of identifying and visualizing uncertainty in greater detail than the first means or the second means.

74. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein a second pattern technique is used by one or more means of the apparatus in modeling the business process.

75. The apparatus of claim 73 further comprising a consolidation means for consolidating the model.

76. The apparatus of claim 73 further comprising a decision toolbox having one or more tools for use with the model created.

77. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the first means uses a conceptual view to create the high level model.

78. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the first means uses a data source definition view to create the high level model.

79. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the first means uses a workflow view to create the high level model.

80. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the second means uses a domain model for modeling a calculation algorithm.

81. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the second means uses a calculation diagram for modeling a calculation algorithm.

82. The apparatus of claim 81 wherein the calculation diagram has one or more layers.

83. The apparatus of claim 81 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

v) generating a user interface form.

84. The apparatus of claim 83 wherein the user interface form comprises a dashboard.

85. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein the second means uses a calculation script for modeling a calculation algorithm.

86. The apparatus of claim 85 wherein the second means also uses a domain model for modeling a calculation algorithm.

87. The apparatus of claim 85 wherein the second means also uses a calculation diagram for modeling a calculation algorithm.

88. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein testing means tests the model using one or more sensitivity charts.

89. The apparatus of claim 73 wherein testing means tests the model using a testing process diagram.

90. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the first means uses a conceptual view to create the high level model.

91. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the first means uses a data source definition view to create the high level model.

92. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the first means uses a workflow view to create the high level model.

93. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second means uses a domain model for modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process.

94. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second means uses a calculation diagram for modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process.

95. The apparatus of claim 94 wherein the calculation diagram has one or more layers.

96. The apparatus of claim 94 wherein the calculation diagram used is generated using the following steps:

i) defining global calculation parameters;

ii) defining one or more input variables and one or more output variables;

iii) defining the calculation algorithm;

iv) testing the calculation algorithm; and

v) generating a user interface form.

97. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second means uses a calculation script for modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process.

98. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the testing means for testing the model uses one or more sensitivity charts.

99. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the testing means for testing the model uses a testing process diagram.

100. The apparatus of claim 76 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox is a sensitivity analysis visual tool.

101. The apparatus of claim 76 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox is a decision analysis tool.

102. The apparatus of claim 101 wherein the decision analysis tool is a decision tree.

103. The apparatus of claim 76 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox is a Monte Carlo simulation.

104. The apparatus of claim 76 wherein one of the tools from the decision toolbox is a discrete simulation visualization.

105. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second pattern technique used by one or more means of the apparatus includes decoupling.

106. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second pattern technique used by one or more means of the apparatus includes encapsulation.

107. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second pattern technique used by one or more means of the apparatus includes a user workflow visualization.

108. The apparatus of claim 74 wherein the second technique used by one or more means of the apparatus includes a multi-layer representation of calculation logic.

110. A computer system for modeling a business process, comprising a processor, at least one input device, and at least one output device, with program instructions being stored on a computer-readable media, the program instructions comprising the following steps:

a) creating a high level model for the business process,

b) modeling a calculation algorithm for the business process; and

c) testing the model;

wherein one or more views are used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c); and

wherein a pattern technique of identifying and visualizing uncertainty is used in each of steps (a), (b) and (c), in increasing detail at each successive step.