Quality filter for the internet

• US 20090070331A1
• Filed: 09/07/2007
• Published: 03/12/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 09/07/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Tambar Arts Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Tambar Arts Ltd.
• Inventors: Silman, Robert
• Granted Patent: US 7,895,202 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/00 Commerce

Abstract

A method and system of rating media content is provided. The method and system provide for a selection of a criterion of quality. A standard quality profile is then determined for the criterion of quality. A filter having a similar quality profile to the criterion of quality is chosen. Statistical analysis may be employed in determining the similarities between the standard quality profile and the filter to be chosen. This filter can be applied to an unknown media sample to produce a rating of the media sample. Filter monitoring may be performed on the filter by comparing the ratings of a media sample from the criterion of quality and the filter.

Claims

1. A method for rating items, comprising:

selecting a critical notion of quality indicative of a quality of an item;

selecting a criterion of quality which determines a quality of an item, each item associated with a quality;

ranking a set of items by each item'"'"'s associated quality;

selecting a standard sample set from the ranked set of items, the standard sample set representing a range of quality;

determining a standard quality profile from the standard sample set and the rankings associated with each item;

selecting at least one proxy for the criterion of quality;

ranking the standard sample set by the proxy and determining a proxy quality profile for the proxy;

comparing a proxy quality profile with the standard quality profile;

selecting the proxy as a quality filter if the proxy quality profile matches the standard quality profile; and

applying the quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing the ranking of a filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality and a ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter; and

effecting at least one of;

a) discarding and b) correcting, the quality filter if the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality does not match the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the second sample set is selected from the ranked set of items and not included in the standard sample set.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

examining a quality filter for aberrant behavior of members; and

discarding an aberrant member from the quality filter.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a predetermined standard deviation of the standard quality filter.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a confidence interval.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the confidence interval is set by the user.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if recognized by a pattern recognition module.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting a second critical notion of quality indicative of a second quality of an item;

selecting a second criterion of quality which determines a second quality of an item, each item associated with a second quality;

ranking a second set of items by each item'"'"'s associated second quality;

selecting a second standard sample set from the second ranked set of items, the second standard sample set representing a range of second quality;

determining a second standard quality profile from the second standard sample set and the second rankings associated with each item;

selecting at least one second proxy for the second criterion of quality;

ranking the second standard sample set by the second proxy and determining a second proxy quality profile for the second proxy;

comparing a second proxy quality profile with the second standard quality profile;

selecting the second proxy as a second quality filter if the second proxy quality profile matches the second standard quality profile; and

applying the second quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

accessing the set of items via the Internet.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein each item is one of music, video, visual art, and text.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

providing the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter to a user.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter is provided to the user over the Internet.

14. A computer-readable medium including instructions adapted to execute a method for rating items, the method comprising:

selecting a critical notion of quality indicative of a quality of an item;

selecting a criterion of quality which determines a quality of an item, each item associated with a quality;

ranking a set of items by each item'"'"'s associated quality;

selecting a standard sample set from the ranked set of items, the standard sample set representing a range of quality;

determining a standard quality profile from the standard sample set and the rankings associated with each item;

selecting at least one proxy for the criterion of quality;

ranking the standard sample set by the proxy and determining a proxy quality profile for the proxy;

comparing a proxy quality profile with the standard quality profile;

selecting the proxy as a quality filter if the proxy quality profile matches the standard quality profile; and

applying the quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items.

15. The medium of claim 14, the method further comprising:

comparing the ranking of a filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality and a ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter, wherein the filter monitor sample set is selected from the ranked set of items and not included in the standard sample set; and

discarding the quality filter if the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality does not match the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter.

16. The medium of claim 14, the method further comprising:

examining a quality filter for aberrant behavior of members; and

discarding an aberrant member from the quality filter.

17. The medium of claim 14, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a predetermined standard deviation of the standard quality filter.

18. The medium of claim 14, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a confidence interval, wherein the confidence interval is set by the user.

19. The medium of claim 14, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if recognized by a pattern recognition module.

20. The medium of claim 14, the method further comprising:

selecting a second critical notion of quality indicative of a second quality of an item;

selecting a second criterion of quality which determines a second quality of an item, each item associated with a second quality;

ranking a second set of items by each item'"'"'s associated second quality;

selecting a second standard sample set from the second ranked set of items, the second standard sample set representing a range of second quality;

determining a second standard quality profile from the second standard sample set and the second rankings associated with each item;

selecting at least one second proxy for the second criterion of quality;

ranking the second standard sample set by the second proxy and determining a second proxy quality profile for the second proxy;

comparing a second proxy quality profile with the second standard quality profile;

selecting the second proxy as a second quality filter if the second proxy quality profile matches the second standard quality profile; and

applying the second quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items.

21. The medium of claim 14, the method further comprising:

accessing the set of items via the Internet, wherein each item is one of music, video, visual art, and text.

22. The medium of claim 14, the method further comprising:

providing the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter to a user, wherein the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter is provided to the user over the Internet.

23. A system for rating items, comprising:

a processor, the processor configured to,

select a critical notion of quality indicative of a quality of an item,

select a criterion of quality which determines a quality of an item, each item associated with a quality,

rank a set of items by each item'"'"'s associated quality,

select a standard sample set from the ranked set of items, the standard sample set representing a range of quality,

determine a standard quality profile from the standard sample set and the rankings associated with each item,

select at least one proxy for the criterion of quality,

rank the standard sample set by the proxy and determining a proxy quality profile for the proxy,

compare a proxy quality profile with the standard quality profile,

select the proxy as a quality filter if the proxy quality profile matches the standard quality profile, and

apply the quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items; and

a memory, the memory configured to store the quality filter and the set of items.

24. The system of claim 23, the processor further configured to,

compare the ranking of a filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality and a ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter, wherein the filter monitor sample set is selected from the ranked set of items and not included in the standard sample set, and

discard the quality filter if the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the criterion of quality does not match the ranking of the filter monitor sample set by the quality filter.

25. The system of claim 23, the processor further configured to,

examine a quality filter for aberrant behavior of members;

and

discard an aberrant member from the quality filter.

26. The system of claim 23, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a predetermined standard deviation of the standard quality filter.

27. The system of claim 23, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if within a confidence interval and the confidence interval is set by the user.

28. The system of claim 23, wherein the quality filter matches the standard quality profile if recognized by a pattern recognition module.

29. The system of claim 23, the processor further configured to,

select a second critical notion of quality indicative of a second quality of an item,

select a second criterion of quality which determines a second quality of an item, each item associated with a second quality,

rank a second set of items by each item'"'"'s associated second quality,

select a second standard sample set from the second ranked set of items, the second standard sample set representing a range of second quality,

determine a second standard quality profile from the second standard sample set and the second rankings associated with each item,

select at least one second proxy for the second criterion of quality,

rank the second standard sample set by the second proxy and determining a second proxy quality profile for the second proxy,

compare a second proxy quality profile with the second standard quality profile,

select the second proxy as a second quality filter if the second proxy quality profile matches the second standard quality profile, and

apply the second quality filter to unranked items and ranking the unranked items.

30. The system of claim 23, the processor further configured to,

access the set of items via the Internet, wherein each item is one of music, video, visual art, and text.

31. The system of claim 23, the processor further configured to,

provide the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter to a user, wherein the ranking of the unranked items by the quality filter is provided to the user over the Internet.