REMOTE SHOCK SENSING AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

• US 20090072964A1
• Filed: 11/11/2008
• Published: 03/19/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 02/03/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: UT-Battelle LLC
• Original Assignee: UT-Battelle LLC
• Inventors: Pearce, James W., MURALIDHARAN, GOVINDARAJAN, Sikka, Vinod K., Jagadish, Usha, Britton, Charles L.
• Granted Patent: US 7,825,819 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/539.300
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/1663 using seismic sensing means
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 31/00 Predictive alarm systems characterised by extrapolation or other computation using updated historic data

Abstract

A low-power shock sensing system includes at least one shock sensor physically coupled to a chemical storage tank to be monitored for impacts, and an RF transmitter which is in a low-power idle state in the absence of a triggering signal. The system includes interface circuitry including or activated by the shock sensor, wherein an output of the interface circuitry is coupled to an input of the RF transmitter. The interface circuitry triggers the RF transmitter with the triggering signal to transmit an alarm message to at least one remote location when the sensor senses a shock greater than a predetermined threshold. In one embodiment the shock sensor is a shock switch which provides an open and a closed state, the open state being a low power idle state.

Claims

1-13. -13. (canceled)

14. A low-power shock sensing system, comprising:

at least one shock sensor physically coupled to a chemical storage tank to be monitored for impacts, wherein the shock sensor comprises at least one mechanically activated sensor coupled to at least one mechanical shock switch having an open and a closed state, the closed state being mechanically initiated by the mechanically activated sensor in response to the mechanically activated sensor receiving a shock greater than a predetermined threshold;

an RF transmitter, the RF transmitter being in a low-power idle state in the absence of a triggering signal; and

interface circuitry for generating the triggering signal, the interface circuitry activated by the shock switch being in the closed state, wherein an output of the interface circuitry is coupled to an input of the RF transmitter, and wherein the interface circuitry triggers the RF transmitter with the triggering signal to transmit an alarm message to at least one remote location.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the RF transmitter comprises an RF transceiver.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein the remote location includes a wireless transceiver system.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the interface circuitry comprises a processor having an adjustable sensitivity to a shock signal received from the shock sensor, the shock signal being representative of the closed state of the shock switch.

18. The system of claim 14, further comprising a battery, wherein the RF transmitter is powered exclusively by the battery.

19. The system of claim 14, wherein the at least one shock sensor comprises a plurality of shock sensors.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the plurality of shock sensors have different ones of the predetermined thresholds.

21. The system of claim 19, wherein the plurality of shock sensors comprise at least three of the shock sensors, the plurality of shock sensors being situated on two or more planes.

22. The system of claim 14, wherein the system comprises a plurality of chemical storage tanks.

23. The system of claim 14, further comprising a chemical sensor having RF communications disposed remotely and within a communicable range from the chemical storage tank, wherein the chemical sensor is in a low-power idle mode absent activation by receipt of an activation signal from the RF transmitter.

24. The system of claim 14, further comprising an explosion-proof housing, wherein the shock switch, the RF transmitter and the interface circuitry are at least partially disposed therein.

25. The system of claim 14, wherein the chemical tank comprises a hydrocarbon storage tank having a fuel therein.

26. The system of claim 14, wherein the shock sensor comprises a cantilever spring.

27. The system of claim 14, wherein the shock sensor comprises a diaphragm.

28. The system of claim 14, further comprising a comparator, wherein the at least one shock sensor is a plurality of shock sensors, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of shock sensors comprise a linear transducer for providing an analog output signal of the linear transducer to the comparator, and wherein the comparator compares an amplitude of the analog output signal of the linear transducer to the predetermined threshold to determine whether the shock signal indicates the shock being greater than the predetermined threshold.

29. A computer-readable storage medium of a computing device, the storage medium comprising computer instructions for causing the computing device to perform the steps of:

receiving a shock signal from a linear transducer physically coupled to a chemical storage tank to be monitored for impacts;

determining whether the shock signal indicates a shock greater than a predetermined threshold using a comparator that compares an amplitude of an analog output signal of the linear transducer to the predetermined threshold; and

transmitting a triggering signal to an RF transmitter when the shock is greater than the predetermined threshold, the triggering signal being adapted to cause the RF transmitter to transmit an alarm message to at least one remote location, the RF transmitter being in a low-power idle state in the absence of the triggering signal.

30. The storage medium of claim 29, further comprising computer instructions for causing the computing device to adjust the predetermined threshold.

31. The storage medium of claim 29, further comprising computer instructions for causing the computing device to receive another shock signal from a shock sensor physically coupled to the chemical storage tank to be monitored for impacts, wherein the shock sensor comprises at least one mechanically activated sensor coupled to at least one mechanical shock switch having an open and a closed state, the closed state being mechanically initiated by the mechanically activated sensor in response to the mechanically activated sensor receiving the shock greater than the predetermined threshold.

32. A method of monitoring for shock associated with a storage tank, the method comprising:

receiving a first shock signal from a linear transducer physically coupled to the storage tank to be monitored for impacts;

determining whether the first shock signal indicates a shock greater than a predetermined threshold;

determining whether a mechanical shock switch is in a closed state, the mechanical shock switch being connected to a shock sensor physically coupled to the storage tank to be monitored for impacts, the shock sensor comprising a mechanically activated sensor coupled to the mechanical shock switch which has an open state and the closed state, the closed state being mechanically initiated by the mechanically activated sensor in response to the mechanically activated sensor receiving the shock greater than the predetermined threshold; and

transmitting a triggering signal to an RF transmitter when the first shock signal is determined to indicate the shock being greater than the predetermined threshold or when the shock switch is in a closed state, the triggering signal being adapted to cause the RF transmitter to transmit an alarm message to at least one remote location.

33. The method of claim 32, further comprising determining whether the first shock signal indicates the shock being greater than the predetermined threshold using a comparator that compares an amplitude of an analog output signal of the linear transducer to the predetermined threshold.