Method for Assessing the Suitability of Metered Dose Inhaler Actuators

• US 20090121722A1
• Filed: 03/22/2007
• Published: 05/14/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/24/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Original Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Inventors: Stein, Stephen W., Mueting, Michael W.
• Granted Patent: US 7,659,725 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/457
• CPC Class Codes: A61M 15/009 using medicine packages with incorporated spraying means, e.g. aerosol cans pocket atomiser of the injector type A61M11/08
• CPC Class Codes: A61M 2209/02 Equipment for testing the apparatus

Abstract

A method of assessing the suitability of a metered dose inhaler actuator A test canister equipped with a valve and containing a pressurized propellant is provided. One or more actuators manufactured for use in a metered dose inhaler is provided and tested, wherein each actuator is tested by coupling the canister to the actuator, positioning the actuator with respect to an electrostatic measurement device and firing the canister such that electrostatic charge from an aerosol emitted by the canister is measured by the electrostatic measurement device. The measured electrostatic charge is compared to a predetermined specification range to make a determination whether the measured electrostatic charge is within or outside the predetermined specification range and accordingly whether the actuator is or is not acceptable.

Claims

1. A method of assessing the suitability of a metered dose inhaler actuator comprising the steps of:

a) providing a test canister equipped with a valve and containing a pressurized propellant;

b) providing one or more actuators manufactured for use in a metered dose inhaler;

c) testing the one or more actuators, wherein each actuator is tested by coupling the canister to the actuator, positioning the actuator with respect to an electrostatic measurement device and firing the canister such that electrostatic charge from an aerosol emitted by the canister is measured by the electrostatic measurement device;

d) comparing the measured electrostatic charge to a predetermined specification range to make a determination whether the measured electrostatic charge is within or outside the predetermined specification range and accordingly whether the actuator is or is not acceptable.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the actuator is separated from the test canister after measuring the electrostatic charge.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein a product canister containing a medicinal aerosol formulation comprising a drug is coupled to each actuator determined to be acceptable after separating the actuator from the test canister to prepare a metered dose inhaler.

5. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the test canister contains a medicinal aerosol formulation that is essentially the same as the medicinal aerosol formulation in the product canister.

6. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the test canister contains a placebo aerosol formulation that is essentially the same as the medicinal aerosol formulation in the product canister with the exception that it lacks a drug.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein each actuator that is determined to be non-acceptable is rejected and discarded.

8. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the provided actuator is directly coupled to the detection portion of the electrostatic measurement device and the emitted aerosol contacts the detection portion of the electrostatic measurement device in the absence of an assisting airflow.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the electrostatic charge of essentially the entire emitted aerosol is measured.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein each actuator in a production lot is tested and accepted or rejected based on an individual measurement of electrostatic charge.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein each actuator is tested during the process of preparing a production lot of actuators so as to provide an in-process quality control mechanism.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a representative number of actuators are selected from a larger production lot of actuators and tested to determine if the larger production lot of actuators should be accepted or rejected.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the predetermined specification range is less than or equal to 10 nanocoulombs.

14. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein 10 to 240 actuators are tested with a single test canister.

16. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the propellant is selected from 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227) or a mixture thereof.

17. A method as claimed in claim 1 and further comprising the steps of:

e) providing a test canister equipped with a valve and containing a pressurized medicinal aerosol formulation;

f) providing one or more actuators manufactured for use in a metered dose inhaler;

g) performing a first test of the one or more actuators, wherein each actuator is tested by coupling the canister to the actuator, positioning the actuator with respect to an electrostatic measurement device and firing the canister such that electrostatic charge from an aerosol emitted by the canister is measured by the electrostatic measurement device;

h) performing a second test of the one or more actuators, wherein each actuator is tested by coupling the canister to the actuator, positioning the actuator with respect to a cascade impactor device, firing the canister, and measuring deposition of the medicinal aerosol formulation;

i) determining a correlation between the measured electrostatic charge and the measured deposition of medicinal formulation; and

j) determining an electrostatic charge specification range based on the correlation between measured electrostatic charge and the measured deposition of medicinal formulation, wherein steps e) to j) are performed prior to performing steps a) to d) and the predetermined specification range of step d) corresponds to the electrostatic charge specification range determined in step j).

18. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein the test canister provided in step a) comprises a placebo aerosol formulation.

19. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the test canister comprises a pressurized aerosol formulation selected so as to provide a more sensitive electrostatic charge measurement response then that of the medicinal aerosol formulation in the product canister.

4. (canceled)

15. (canceled)