Sensor Arrangement for a Motor-Vehicle Locking Device and an Associated Method

• US 20090133510A1
• Filed: 07/21/2006
• Published: 05/28/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 07/26/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Huf Hulsbeck & Furst GmbH & Co. KG
• Original Assignee: HUF Hulsbeck & Furst Gumbh & Company KG
• Inventors: Schumacher, Helmut, Witte, Martin
• Granted Patent: US 7,654,147 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 73/862.626
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 77/34 Protection against weather or dirt, e.g. against water ingress closures or guards for keyholes E05B17/14
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 81/76 Detection of handle operation; Detection of a user approaching a handle; Electrical switching actions performed by door handles
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 81/77 comprising sensors detecting the presence of the hand of a user
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 81/78 as part of a hands-free locking or unlocking operation
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 85/16 a longitudinal grip part being pivoted at one end about an axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the grip part
• CPC Class Codes: H03K 17/94 characterised by the way in which the control signals are generated
• CPC Class Codes: H03K 2017/9602 characterised by the type or shape of the sensing electrodes

Abstract

A method for detecting the application of an operator'"'"'s body part to an operating point of a locking device for a motor vehicle is performed by first detecting the proximity of the operator'"'"'s body part to the operating point via a proximity sensor. A change in the pressure exerted on the operating point by the operator'"'"'s body part is detected using a mechanical sensor which is arranged on the operating point. An output signal, which indicates the application of the operator'"'"'s body part, is generated by an evaluation circuit as a function of the sensor output signals from the proximity sensor and the mechanical sensor. When the evaluation circuit detects the beginning of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part on the basis of the sensor output signal from the mechanical sensor, a sensor output signal value which is output at approximately the same time by the proximity sensor is detected. This is used to evaluate the subsequent changes in the sensor output signal in order to be able to detect in a more reliable manner that the operator'"'"'s body part has been withdrawn from the operating point. Also disclosed is an associated sensor arrangement.

Claims

1-13. -13. (canceled)

14. Sensor arrangement for detecting the application of an operator'"'"'s body part to an actuating point of a locking device of a motor vehicle,

with a proximity sensor which is disposed in such a way that the proximity sensor can detect the proximity of the operator'"'"'s body part to the actuating point,

with a mechanical sensor which is disposed on the actuating point and can detect a change in the pressing force exerted on the actuating point by the operator'"'"'s body part,

and with an evaluation circuit which as a function of the sensor output signals from the proximity sensor and the mechanical sensor can generate an output signal which indicates the application of the operator'"'"'s body part,

characterised in that

when the sensor output signal from the mechanical sensor indicates the start of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part the evaluation circuit uses a sensor output signal value which is output at approximately the same time by the proximity sensor for evaluation of the subsequent changes in the sensor output signal of the proximity sensor in order to be able to detect more reliably that the operator'"'"'s body part has been withdrawn from the actuating point.

15. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 14, characterised in that the proximity sensor is a capacitive proximity sensor having at least one electrode which is disposed in such a way that the capacitive proximity sensor can detect proximity to the actuating point.

16. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 15, characterised in that the sensor output signal from the mechanical sensor indicates the start of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part, as it indicates a dramatic increase in the exerted pressing force by a dramatic change in the signal.

17. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 14, characterised in that the evaluation circuit uses the sensor output signal value output by the proximity sensor for evaluation of the subsequent changes to the sensor output signal by deriving a threshold value from the sensor output signal value output simultaneously by the proximity sensor, then it compares the sensor output signal from the capacitive proximity sensor with the threshold value and effects a change to the output signal which indicates the withdrawal of the operator'"'"'s body part when the sensor output signal from the proximity sensor falls below the threshold value.

18. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 17, characterised in that the evaluation circuit maintains the threshold value for a predetermined time which corresponds approximately to a maximum expected duration of application of the operator'"'"'s body part, and then slowly lowers the threshold value to an initial value.

19. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 17, characterised in that the mechanical sensor is a piezoelectric sensor or a capacitive force sensor.

20. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 17, characterised in that the actuating point is located on a motor vehicle door handle.

21. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 20, characterised in that the mechanical sensor is disposed between the electrode of a capacitive proximity sensor and a resilient outer wall of the motor vehicle door handle.

22. Sensor arrangement as claimed in claim 20, characterised in that the mechanical sensor is disposed below the electrode of a capacitive proximity sensor, wherein the electrode and an outer wall of the motor vehicle door handle lying above it are constructed in such a way that they allow a transfer of a pressing force to the mechanical sensor.

23. Method of detecting the application of an operator'"'"'s body part to an actuating point of a locking device of a motor vehicle, in which:

the proximity of an operator'"'"'s body part to the actuating point is detected by a proximity sensor,

a change to a pressing force exerted by the operator'"'"'s body part on the actuating point is detected by a mechanical sensor disposed on the actuating point, and

an output signal which indicates the application of the operator'"'"'s body part is generated by an evaluation circuit as a function of the sensor output signals from the proximity sensor and the mechanical sensor,

characterised in that

when the start of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part is detected by the evaluation circuit on the basis of the sensor output signal from the mechanical sensor, a sensor output signal value which is output at approximately the same time by the proximity sensor is detected and is used for evaluation of the subsequent changes in the sensor output signal of the proximity sensor in order to be able to detect more reliably that the operator'"'"'s body part has been withdrawn from the actuating point.

24. Method as claimed in claim 23, characterised in that the start of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part is indicated by the sensor output signal from the mechanical sensor as a dramatic increase in the exerted pressing force is indicated by a dramatic change in signal.

25. Method as claimed in claim 23, characterised in that the sensor output signal value output simultaneously by the proximity sensor is detected by the evaluation circuit and is used for evaluation of the subsequent changes to the sensor output signal from the proximity sensor in that:

a threshold value is derived from the sensor output signal value output simultaneously by the proximity sensor,

then the sensor output signal from the proximity sensor is compared with the threshold value, and

a change to the output signal indicating the withdrawal of the operator'"'"'s body part is generated as soon as the sensor output signal from the proximity sensor falls below the threshold value.

26. Method as claimed in claim 25, characterised in that the threshold value is maintained for a predetermined time which corresponds approximately to a maximum expected duration of the application of the operator'"'"'s body part and is then lowered slowly to an initial value.