Automated financial scenario modeling and analysis tool having an intelligent graphical user interface

• US 20090138307A1
• Filed: 10/08/2008
• Published: 05/28/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 10/09/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Babcock & Brown LP A Delaware Limited Partnership
• Original Assignee: Babcock & Brown LP A Delaware Limited Partnership
• Inventors: Lee, Luke, Collop, David J., Bewsher, Mark R., Niemira, Thadeus H., Moritz, Dennis D., Cohn, Stephen G., Carnicelli, Galen, Belcsak, Ladislav V.
• Application Number:
  US12/285,565
• Publication Number:
  US 20090138307A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/06 Asset management; Financial planning or analysis

Abstract

A financial scenario modeling and analysis tool, including a graphical user interface which enables a user of the tool to create a graphical model of a financial scenario, generally including at least one financial transaction, on a display screen, and an engine operable, in response to creation of the graphical model, to automatically generate information, such as financial or mathematical information, which at least partially models at least a part of the financial scenario using information collected by the engine during creation of the graphical model. The graphical user interface enables the user to create party graphics respectively representing parties to the financial deal, and to generate financial instrument graphics representing financial instruments, wherein each financial instrument graphic connects two of the party graphics. The engine generates, in response to the creation of a graphical model, an instrument information, such as an object or template, for each of the instruments in the graphical model. The tool includes a natural date language and a formula language for use in modeling a scenario. The tool enables optimization of optimizable parameters defined in the scenario, and includes a user-friendly, book-like and CAD-like user interface. A “Cockpit” comprising a number of modules is provided to the tool to enable a user to structure partnerships. Also, a number of partnership calculations can be performed and a number of reports generated for communicating and interpreting the effects and results of the assumptions and structural options provided in the Cockpit modules.

Claims

1. A computer-readable storage medium tangibly storing a program for generating a dynamic, at least partially user-defined model enabling a user to analyze and track a partnership structure or financing, comprising:

a user interface configured to enable the user to select deal components or attributes from a standardized list of components and attributes residing in an abstracted model for inclusion in the at least partially user-defined model;

a categorizing module configured to insert any selected deal components and attributes into the at least partially user-defined model in dependence on a taxonomy of transaction types that includes the deal components and attributes;

a reports module configured to generate reports having content that provides transparency and proof of the at least partially user-defined model, the content of the reports being customizably-generated such that the content of the reports is variable based on the selected deal components and attributes having been inserted by the categorizing module into the at least partially user-defined model; and

a tracking interface configured to (1) display a prospective model for the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing, and (2) guide execution of the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing.

2. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the taxonomy of transaction types includes abstracted references among and between the transaction types, deal components, and attributes stored therein.

3. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the categorizing module is configured to automatically generate exceptions in dependence on the taxonomy.

4. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the at least partially user-defined model is dynamic and customized for a client or project.

5. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 4, wherein the at least partially user-defined model is a renewable energy partnership model.

6. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the standardized list of components and attributes comprise both (a) simple inputs or selections, and (b) complex objects which, in turn, include complex sub-objects and/or simple inputs or selections.

7. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein one said complex object or complex sub-object is either time or a time value of money.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, further comprising an accounting module configured to interpret and use a common set of user-coded partnership rules for substantially every function with which the accounting module interfaces.

9. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the accounting module is further configured to perform partnership liquidations in separate parallel scenarios by recursively calling itself.

10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the parallel scenarios include (a) a base case outcome, and (b) a hypothetical liquidation at book value (HLBV) simulation.

11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the at least partially user-defined model is arranged so as to account for circularities in the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing.

12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein inputs are impacted via a feedback loop so as to account for any tax consequences of changes to capital accounts, allocations or reallocations of profits and risk, changes to the tax basis, and flips.

13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the user interface includes a participants dimension module configured to display data for the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing from perspectives of any partners, partnership developers, lenders, and purchasers involved in the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing.

14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the user interface includes a participants dimension module configured to provide parallel tracking for income-reporting authorities.

15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the user interface includes a perspectives dimension module configured to provide data among outcomes including base case, downside, and debt restructuring.

16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the data for the base case includes cash, book income, taxable income, tax basis, and GAAP related data.

17. A computer-implemented method for analyzing and tracking a partnership structure or financing via a dynamic, at least partially user-defined model, the method being performed by executing instructions tangibly stored on a computer-readable storage medium, the method comprising:

selecting, via a user interface, deal components or attributes from a standardized list of components and attributes residing in an abstracted model;

inserting, via a categorizing module, any selected deal components and attributes into the at least partially user-defined model in dependence on a taxonomy of transaction types;

generating, via a reports module, reports having content that provides transparency and proof of the at least partially user-defined model, the content of the reports being customizably-generated such that the content of the reports is variable based on the selected deal components and attributes having been inserted by the categorizing module into the at least partially user-defined model; and

providing a tracking interface configured to (1) display a prospective model for the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing, and (2) guide execution of the analyzed and tracked partnership structure or financing.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the taxonomy of transaction types includes abstracted references among and between the transaction types stored therein.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least partially user-defined model is dynamic and customized for a client or project.

20. A system for modeling and analyzing an economic transaction for a client or project, comprising:

a participants module, the participants module configured to enable a user to model and analyze the economic transaction in terms of any partners, partnership developers, power purchasers, and lenders associated with the economic transaction;

a transaction type module, the transaction type configured to enable the user to model and analyze the economic transaction in terms of any debt, capital contributions, minimum gain chargebacks, and asset purchases associated with the economic transaction;

a perspective module, the perspective module configured to enable the user to model and analyze the economic transaction in terms of a base case, any downside, and any debt restructuring associated with the economic transaction; and

a user interface configured to enable the user to (1) input a common set of rules and transaction attributes to be shared among the participants, transaction type, and perspective modules, (2) display a prospective model for the economic transaction, and (3) help guide execution of the economic transaction for the client or project.