APPLICATION OF QUERY WEIGHTS INPUT TO AN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INFORMATION SYSTEM TO TARGET ADVERTISING

• US 20090138329A1
• Filed: 11/26/2007
• Published: 05/28/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 11/26/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: William Paul Wanker
• Original Assignee: William Paul Wanker
• Inventors: Wanker, William Paul
• Application Number:
  US11/945,242
• Publication Number:
  US 20090138329A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/10
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0203 Market surveys; Market polls
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0204 Market segmentation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0264 based upon schedule
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Abstract

An online commerce information system (OCIS) receives from a consumer a query in relation to a potential consumer transaction and also receives a set of weighting factors that correspond to the query, where the weighting factors pertain to stored data relevant to the potential consumer transaction. The OCIS causes a result of applying the query and the weighting factors to the stored data to be communicated to the consumer, in response to the query. The OCIS also selects an advertisement to be communicated to the consumer based on at least one of the weighting factors, and causes the selected advertisement to be communicated to the consumer.

Claims

1. A machine-implemented method comprising:

receiving at an online commerce information system (OCIS), from a consumer, a set of weighting factors that correspond to a query in relation to a potential consumer transaction, the weighting factors pertaining to stored data relevant to the potential consumer transaction;

receiving the query at the OCIS from the consumer;

by the OCIS, causing a result of applying the query and the weighting factors to the stored data to be communicated to the consumer, in response to the query;

by the OCIS, selecting an advertisement to be communicated to the consumer based on at least one of the weighting factors; and

by the OCIS, causing the selected advertisement to be communicated to the consumer.

2. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the weighting factors are specified by the consumer prior to the consumer submitting the query.

3. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer in response to the query.

4. A method as recited in claim 3, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer concurrently with, and through the same communication medium as, the result.

5. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein the advertisement is communicated to the consumer through a different communication medium than the result.

6. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a positive correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

7. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a negative correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

8. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by at least said consumer.

9. A method as recited in claim 8, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by the consumer to the set of weighting factors.

10. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by a plurality of consumers.

11. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by the consumers to the set of weighting factors.

12. A machine-implemented method comprising:

receiving at an OCIS, from a consumer, a set of weighting factors specified by a consumer prior to submission of a query by the consumer, the query related to a potential consumer transaction, the weighting factors corresponding to stored comparison data related to a plurality of merchants or products;

receiving at the OCIS, the query from the consumer, the query for retrieving information on the plurality of merchants or products;

by the OCIS, accessing the stored comparison data in response to the query;

by the OCIS, generating a ranking of the merchants or the products based on the set of weighting factors and the comparison data;

by the OCIS, returning the ranking to the consumer as a response to the query;

by the OCIS, selecting an advertisement based on at least one of the weighting factors; and

by the OCIS, causing the selected advertisement to be communicated to the consumer.

13. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer in response to the query.

14. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer concurrently with, and through the same communication medium as, the result.

15. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein the advertisement is communicated to the consumer through a different communication medium than the result.

16. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a positive correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

17. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a negative correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

18. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by at least said consumer.

19. A method as recited in claim 18, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by the consumer to the set of weighting factors.

20. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by a plurality of consumers.

21. A method as recited in claim 20, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by consumers to the set of weighting factors.

22. A processing system comprising:

a processor;

a network interface, coupled to the processor, through which to communicate over a network with a terminal device used by a consumer; and

a memory storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to perform a process that comprises;

receiving from the terminal, a set of weighting factors related to a query by the consumer that pertains to a potential consumer transaction, the weighting factors corresponding to stored comparison data related to a plurality of merchants or products;

receiving the query from the terminal device, the query for retrieving information on the plurality of merchants or products;

accessing the stored comparison data in response to the query;

generating a ranking of the merchants or the products based on the set of weighting factors and the comparison data;

returning the ranking to the consumer as a response to the query;

selecting an advertisement based on at least one of the weighting factors; and

causing the selected advertisement to be communicated to the consumer.

23. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein the weighting factors are specified by the consumer prior to the consumer submitting the query.

24. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer in response to the query.

25. A processing system as recited in claim 24, wherein the selected advertisement is communicated to the consumer concurrently with, and through the same communication medium as, the result.

26. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein the advertisement is communicated to the consumer through a different communication medium than the result.

27. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a positive correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

28. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein selecting the advertisement comprises selecting an advertisement that has a negative correspondence to at least one of the weighting factors.

29. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by at least said consumer.

30. A processing system as recited in claim 29, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by the consumer to the set of weighting factors.

31. A processing system as recited in claim 22, wherein selecting the advertisement is further based on a historical record of actions by a plurality of consumers.

32. A processing system as recited in claim 31, wherein the historical record comprises a record of changes made by the consumers to the set of weighting factors.