CAPITAL ALLOCATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS

• US 20090150205A1
• Filed: 12/06/2007
• Published: 06/11/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 12/06/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Verizon Patent and Licensing Incorporated (Verizon Communications Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Verizon Corporate Services Corp. (Verizon Communications Inc.), Verizon Corporate Services Group Incorporated (Verizon Communications Inc.), Verizon Services Organization Incorporated (Verizon Communications Inc.)
• Inventors: Evans, Gregory K., Thomas, Sammy J., Legaz, Mariano J., McCauley, Daniel J., Schneur, Rina R., Liu, Hui, Tobin, Roger L.
• Application Number:
  US11/951,967
• Publication Number:
  US 20090150205A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Abstract

In an exemplary system, a capital allocation subsystem is selectively and communicatively coupled to a project screening subsystem. The project screening subsystem is configured to aggregate project data corresponding to a plurality of potential projects within an organization and communicate the project data to the capital allocation subsystem. The capital allocation subsystem is configured to facilitate input of one or more constraints on allocation of capital among the potential projects and adjust at least one of the constraints to select a subset of the potential projects for the allocation of the capital such that a return on the capital is optimized.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a project screening subsystem; and

a capital allocation subsystem selectively and communicatively coupled to said project screening subsystem;

wherein said project screening subsystem is configured to aggregate project data corresponding to a plurality of potential projects within an organization and communicate said project data to said capital allocation subsystem; and

wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to

facilitate input of one or more constraints on allocation of capital among said potential projects; and

adjust at least one of said constraints to select a subset of said potential projects for said allocation of said capital such that a return on said capital is optimized.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is further configured to use said constraints to determine one or more marginal projects within said potential projects.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is further configured to include at least one of said marginal projects within said subset of said potential projects selected for said allocation of said capital.

4. The system of claim 2, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to generate a sensitivity value for each of said constraints based on said identification of said marginal projects, and wherein said adjustment of said at least one of said constraints is performed in accordance with at least one of said sensitivity values.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is further configured to select another distinct subset of said potential projects for said allocation of said capital such that said return on said capital is optimized.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to generate one or more reports configured to facilitate comparison of said subsets of said potential projects selected for said allocation of said capital.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to generate one or more graphical user interfaces configured to facilitate said input of said one or more constraints and said adjustment of said at least one of said constraints.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to perform an infeasibility analysis of one or more of said constraints.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein said capital allocation subsystem is configured to analyze a dependency relationship between two or more of said potential projects.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein said return on said capital is measured based on at least one of net present value, cash flow return on investment, profitability index, revenue, operating income, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein said one or more constraints comprises at least one capital constraint.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein said organization comprises a plurality of business units each corresponding to at least one of said potential projects.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein two or more of said potential projects are dependent on one another.

14. A method comprising:

analyzing project data corresponding to a plurality of potential projects within an organization;

facilitating input of one or more constraints on allocation of capital among said potential projects;

using said constraints to determine at least one marginal project among said potential projects; and

adjusting at least one of said constraints to select a subset of said potential projects for said allocation of said capital such that a return on said capital is optimized.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising measuring said return on said capital with at least one of net present value, cash flow return on investment, profitability index, revenue, operating income, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising including at least one of said marginal projects within said subset of said potential projects selected for said allocation of said capital.

17. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

generating a sensitivity value for each of said constraints based on said identification of said marginal projects; and

adjusting said at least one of said constraints in accordance with at least one of said sensitivity values.

18. The method of claim 14, further comprising selecting another distinct subset of said potential projects for said allocation of said capital such that said return on said capital is optimized.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising generating one or more reports configured to facilitate comparison of said subsets of said potential projects selected for said allocation of said capital.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein said organization comprises a plurality of business units each corresponding to at least one of said potential projects.

21. The method of claim 14, wherein two or more of said potential projects are dependent on one another.

22. A computer-readable medium including instructions configured to direct a computer to:

analyze project data corresponding to a plurality of potential projects within an organization;

facilitate input of one or more constraints on allocation of capital among said potential projects;

use said constraints to determine at least one marginal project among said potential projects; and

adjust at least one of said constraints to select a subset of said potential projects for said allocation of said capital such that a return on said capital is optimized.

23. The computer-readable medium of claim 22, wherein said instructions are further configured to direct said computer to include at least one of said marginal projects within said subset of said potential projects selected for said allocation of said capital.

24. The computer-readable medium of claim 23, wherein said instructions are further configured to direct said computer to:

generate a sensitivity value for each of said constraints based on said identification of said marginal projects; and

adjust said at least one of said constraints in accordance with at least one of said sensitivity values.