Apparatus, Method and Computer Program Product for Generating Debriefing Charts

• US 20090150800A1
• Filed: 12/04/2008
• Published: 06/11/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 12/05/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Gary Cazenas, Glenn Wood
• Original Assignee: Gary Cazenas, Glenn Wood
• Inventors: Wood, Glenn, Cazenas, Gary
• Application Number:
  US12/328,220
• Publication Number:
  US 20090150800A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/751
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/338 Presentation of query results
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/345 Summarisation for human users
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9038 Presentation of query results

Abstract

An apparatus, method, and computer program product for generating and displaying debriefing charts to authorized users. According to disclosed methods, debriefing charts are generated by obtaining summarized evaluation data; formatting the summarized data according to predetermined settings; and generating slides or pages using the formatted data. In some cases, custom debriefing charts may be generated e.g., based upon user authorization level. The apparatus includes a debriefing tool that may be standalone or integrated with a proposal evaluation tool using appropriate APIs, plug-ins, etc. The debriefing tool includes a plurality of modules including e.g., an evaluation data acquisition module, a formatting module, a debriefing chart generating module, a display module, and a user interface module.

Claims

1. A computerized method for generating and displaying a debriefing chart to authorized user(s) for a proposal selection process in which one or more winning proposal(s) are selected from a group of submitted proposals, the method comprising:

a) using a first processor to obtain summarized evaluation data for one or more of the submitted proposals;

b) using a second processor to format the summarized data according to predetermined settings;

c) using a third processor to generate a debriefing chart using the formatted, summarized data; and

d) displaying the generated debriefing chart to authorized user(s).

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of using a first processor to obtain summarized evaluation data includes summarizing the evaluation data.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of using a first processor to obtain summarized evaluation data includes obtaining data from one or more of a:

database, datastore, and data file.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of using the second processor to format the summarized data is performed after one or more predetermined conditions have been met.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein one predetermined condition is that evaluation data has been obtained for all proposals in the group.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein one predetermined condition is that the evaluation data has been through a consensus process.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the formatting step includes formatting the evaluation data according to at least one content-specific parameter.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein at least one content-specific parameter corresponds to winning proposal(s) and wherein the generating and displaying steps include generating and displaying one or more debriefing pages or slides indicating the winning proposal(s).

9. A computer program product residing on a computer readable medium and containing instructions, that when executed by a computer, cause the computer to automatically generate a debriefing chart for a proposal selection process in which one or more winning proposals are selected from a group of submitted proposals, the instructions comprising:

a) obtaining summarized evaluation data for one or more of the proposals;

b) formatting the summarized data according to predetermined settings;

c) generating a debriefing chart using the formatted, summarized data; and

d) displaying the generated debriefing chart to authorized user(s).

10. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein the instructions for obtaining summarized evaluation data further include instructions for summarizing the evaluation data.

11. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein the instructions for obtaining summarized evaluation data include obtaining data from one or more of a:

database, datastore, and data file.

12. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein the instructions for formatting the summarized data are executed after one or more predetermined conditions have been met.

13. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein one predetermined condition is that evaluation data has been obtained for all proposals in the group.

14. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein one predetermined condition is that the evaluation data has been through a consensus process.

15. The computer program product of claim 9, wherein the instructions for formatting include instructions for formatting the evaluation data according to at least one content-specific parameter.

16. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein at least one content-specific parameter corresponds to winning proposal(s) and further including instructions for generating and displaying one or more debriefing page(s) or slide(s) indicating the winning proposal(s).

17. A computerized debriefing tool for generating and displaying a debriefing chart to authorized user(s) for a proposal selection process in which one or more winning proposals are selected from a group of submitted proposals, the debriefing tool comprising:

a) a first processor that obtains summarized evaluation data for one or more of the submitted proposals;

b) a second processor that formats the summarized data according to predetermined settings;

c) a third processor that generates a debriefing chart using the formatted, summarized data; and

d) a display that displays the generated debriefing chart to authorized user(s).

18. The debriefing tool of claim 17, wherein the first processor is configured to summarize the evaluation data.

19. The debriefing tool of claim 17, wherein the second processor is configured to format the evaluation data according to at least one content-specific parameter.

20. The debriefing tool of claim 19, wherein at least one content-specific parameter corresponds to winning proposal(s) and wherein the third processor is configured to generate one or more debriefing page(s) or slide(s) indicating the winning proposal(s).