Managing Bandwidth during a Contention Free Period in a LAN

• US 20090161682A1
• Filed: 12/21/2007
• Published: 06/25/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 12/21/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: General Instrument Corporation (CommScope Holding Company, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: General Instrument Corporation (CommScope Holding Company, Inc.)
• Inventors: Beacham, Gordon, Litwak, Robert, Johnson, Jed
• Application Number:
  US11/962,905
• Publication Number:
  US 20090161682A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/401
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/66 Arrangements for connecting between networks having differing types of switching systems, e.g. gateways

Abstract

Bandwidth for a contention free period in a LAN is managed using an access control list. A request for bandwidth during the contention free period is received. A determination is made as to whether to grant the request for bandwidth based on the access control list.

Claims

1. A method for managing bandwidth during a contention free period in a local area network (LAN), the method comprising:

storing an access control list;

receiving a request for bandwidth during the contention free period; and

determining whether to grant the request for bandwidth during the contention free period based on the access control list.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether to grant the request for bandwidth based on the access control list comprises:

identifying a device sending the request for bandwidth; and

parsing the access control list to determine whether the device is approved for bandwidth during the contention free period.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

if the device is approved for bandwidth during the contention free period, scheduling a time during the contention free period for the device to communicate on the LAN; and

if the device is not approved for bandwidth during the contention free period, denying access to bandwidth during the contention free period.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the access control list comprises a white list, a black list or both the white list and the black list, wherein the white list identifies the devices that are approved to be given scheduled access to bandwidth during the contention free period, and the black list identifies devices that are not to be given access to bandwidth during the contention free period.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein only devices on the white list are given scheduled access to bandwidth during the contention free period.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

populating the access control list with an identification of devices based on a decision of a service provider providing a service via the LAN.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

determining information about devices connected to the LAN when the devices request IP addresses;

providing the information to the service provider;

receiving an indication from the service provider whether each device is approved or not approved for scheduled access to bandwidth during the contention free period; and

identifying each device as approved or not approved for scheduled access to bandwidth during the contention free period on the access control list based on the indications received from the service provider.

8. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

determining whether there is a problem with the service provided via the LAN;

providing information about devices connected to LAN to the service provider;

receiving an identification of each device not provided by the service provider; and

for each device not provided by the service provider, identifying the device as not approved for scheduled access to bandwidth during the contention free period on the access control list.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

populating the access control list with an identification of devices based on a decision of a user having devices connected to the LAN.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

dividing the total bandwidth on the LAN between the contention free period and a contention period, wherein scheduled access to bandwidth is provided for bandwidth in the contention free period and unscheduled access to bandwidth is provided for bandwidth in the contention period.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

automatically detecting devices that are allowed or not allowed to be given bandwidth during the contention free period; and

automatically populating the access control list with the detected devices.

12. A residential gateway providing an interface between service providers and devices at a customer premises, the residential gateway comprising:

a QoS manager;

an access control list stored in data storage; and

interfaces connecting at least one service provider network to a network at the customer premises,

wherein the QoS manager is configured to receive a request for bandwidth during a contention free period from a device connected to the network at the customer premises, and the QoS manager is configured to determine whether to grant the request based on the access control list.

13. The residential gateway of claim 12, wherein the access control list identifies whether devices connected to the network at the customer premises are approved or not approved for scheduled access to bandwidth during the content free period and the devices that are approved or not approved are automatically detected and the access control list is automatically populated with the devices approved or not approved.

14. The residential gateway of claim 13, wherein the service provider approves or does not approve the devices connected to the network at the customer premises for scheduled access to bandwidth during the content free period, and indication of the approval or the non-approval for each device is provided in the access control list.

15. The residential gateway of claim 14, wherein the QoS manager receives information from the devices connected to the LAN when the devices request IP addresses and provides the information to the service provider for determining whether to approve or not approve the devices for scheduled access to bandwidth during the content free period.

16. The residential gateway of claim 14, wherein the QoS manager determines whether there is a problem with the service provided via the LAN and provides information about the devices connected to LAN to the service provider for determining whether to approve or not approve the devices for scheduled access to bandwidth during the content free period.

17. The residential gateway of claim 13, wherein a user of the devices approves or does not approve the devices connected to the network at the customer premises for scheduled access to bandwidth during the content free period.

18. The residential gateway of claim 12, wherein a total bandwidth on the LAN is divided between the contention free period and a contention period, wherein scheduled access to bandwidth is provided for bandwidth in the contention free period and unscheduled access for bandwidth is provided for bandwidth in the contention period.

20. The computer readable medium of claim 18, wherein determining whether to grant the request for bandwidth based on the access control list comprises:

automatically detecting devices that are allowed or not allowed to be given bandwidth during the contention free period;

automatically populating the access control list with the detected devices;

identifying a device sending the request for bandwidth during the contention free period; and

parsing the access control list to determine whether the device is approved for bandwidth during the contention free period.

19. A computer readable medium on which is embedded a computer program, the computer program implementing a method for managing bandwidth during a contention free period in a LAN, the method comprising:

storing an access control list;

receiving a request for bandwidth during the contention free period; and

determining whether to grant the request for bandwidth during the contention free period based on the access control list.