USE OF MULTI-LEVEL STATE ASSESSMENT IN COMPUTER BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTS

• US 20090171703A1
• Filed: 12/28/2007
• Published: 07/02/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 12/28/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: BOBAK, Mythili K., SWANSON, Michael D., MCCONNELL, Tim A.
• Application Number:
  US11/965,832
• Publication Number:
  US 20090171703A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063114 Status monitoring or status determination for a person or group

Abstract

Management of a business environment is facilitated by enabling customers to determine the sensitivity of events on resources, dynamically evaluate composed state of those resources, based on the sensitivity, and use that state in management of the environment. Management is further facilitated by the dynamic evaluation of aggregated state of business applications, which may also be used in management.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method to assess state, said computer-implemented method comprising:

identifying an information technology (IT) component for which state is to be assessed; and

dynamically assessing state for the IT component based on one or more defined rules and one or more environment conditions, said one or more environment conditions having real-time values associated therewith which are employed in the dynamically assessing.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the IT component comprises a resource and the state comprises composed state of the resource.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the dynamically assessing based on a defined rule of the one or more defined rules comprises using one or more current values for one or more attributes of the defined rule with at least one of one or more comparisons or one or more logical operators specified in the defined rule to evaluate the composed state.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the IT component comprises a representation of a business application and the state comprises aggregated state of the business application.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein the dynamically assessing aggregated state for the business application comprises using one or more rules in the assessing.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the one or more environment conditions comprise at least one of information associated with a current representation of an IT environment, one or more values of one or more resource attributes, or state of a redundancy group having one or more functionally equivalent resources.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein at least one rule of the one or more defined rules is specified by a customer.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising defining the one or more defined rules, the one or more defined rules comprising at least one of one or more rules for composed resource state or one or more rules for aggregated state.

9. A system to assess state, said system comprising:

at least one processor to dynamically assess state for an information technology (IT) component based on one or more defined rules and one or more environment conditions, said one or more environment conditions having real-time values associated therewith which are employed in the dynamically assessing.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the IT component comprises a resource and the state comprises composed state of the resource.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor to dynamically assess based on a defined rule of the one or more defined rules uses one or more current values for one or more attributes of the defined rule with at least one of one or more comparisons or one or more logical operators specified in the defined rule to evaluate the composed state.

12. The system of claim 9, wherein the IT component comprises a representation of a business application and the state comprises aggregated state of the business application.

13. The system of claim 9, wherein the one or more environment conditions comprise at least one of information associated with a current representation of an IT environment, one or more values of one or more resource attributes, or state of a redundancy group having one or more functionally equivalent resources.

14. The system of claim 9, wherein at least one rule of the one or more defined rules is specified by a customer.

15. An article of manufacture comprising:

at least one computer usable medium having computer readable program code logic to assess state, said computer readable program code logic when executing performing the following;

identifying an information technology (IT) component for which state is to be assessed; and

dynamically assessing state for the IT component based on one or more defined rules and one or more environment conditions, said one or more environment conditions having real-time values associated therewith which are employed in the dynamically assessing.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein the IT component comprises a resource and the state comprises composed state of the resource.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 16, wherein the dynamically assessing based on a defined rule of the one or more defined rules comprises using one or more current values for one or more attributes of the defined rule with at least one of one or more comparisons or one or more logical operators specified in the defined rule to evaluate the composed state.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein the IT component comprises a representation of a business application and the state comprises aggregated state of the business application.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein the one or more environment conditions comprise at least one of information associated with a current representation of an IT environment, one or more values of one or more resource attributes, or state of a redundancy group having one or more functionally equivalent resources.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein at least one rule of the one or more defined rules is specified by a customer.