Natural language minimally explicit grammar pattern

• US 20090171908A1
• Filed: 03/28/2008
• Published: 07/02/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/02/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ben Rady, Craig Walls, Daniel L. James, Kelly Christopher Fox, Michael Patrick Nash, Paul Randolph Jr. Holser, Roderick F. Coffin III, Ruby Bailey, Ryan Scott Breidenbach
• Original Assignee: Ben Rady, Craig Walls, Daniel L. James, Kelly Christopher Fox, Michael Patrick Nash, Paul Randolph Jr. Holser, Roderick F. Coffin III, Ruby Bailey, Ryan Scott Breidenbach
• Inventors: Coffin, Roderick F. III, Breidenbach, Ryan Scott, Walls, Craig, Holser, Paul Randolph JR., Nash, Michael Patrick, Fox, Kelly Christopher, Rady, Ben, James, Daniel L., Bailey, Ruby
• Application Number:
  US12/079,793
• Publication Number:
  US 20090171908A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/3329 Natural language query formulation or dialogue systems

Abstract

The invention utilizes a known syntax and concept model to enable a user to make a reliable and accurate database query with words that more closely resemble the user'"'"'s natural language and less like a structured database query. It is emphasized that this abstract is provided to comply with the rules requiring an abstract that will allow a searcher or other reader to quickly ascertain the subject matter of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. 37 CFR 1.72(b).

Claims

1. A method for providing a user the ability to find specific data without ambiguity using a subset of that user'"'"'s natural language in a subject area, comprising:

accepting an input from a user, the input comprising words, and the input being restricted to a predefined syntax comprising a predefined set of words, in a known order, from a first known subject area;

the input being a database inquiry; and

generating an answer comprising a datum in response to the database inquiry.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising validating that the input matches an expected structure.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising mapping the words to a conceptual inquiry.

4. A method for providing a user the ability to find specific data without ambiguity using a subset of that user'"'"'s natural language in a subject area, comprising:

a user entering a search that locates structured data in a database, comprising;

mandatory elements, comprising

a command, and

a target concept, and

an optional set of optional elements, comprising

a relationship, or

a value.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the optional set of optional elements further comprises a comparitor.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the value is associated with the comparitor.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the comparitor is associated with a second value.

8. The method of claim 4 wherein the optional set of optional elements comprise a second relationship and a second concept related to the second relationship.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the set of optional elements comprise a third relationship and a third concept related to the third relationship.

10. The method of claim 4 further comprising a second set of optional elements.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the second set of optional elements comprises a relationship and a concept.

12. The method of claim 4 wherein the command is a “

find”

command.

13. The method of claim 4 wherein the target concept is a “

sales”

concept.

14. The method of claim 5 wherein the relationship is an “

exact match”

relationship.

15. The method of claim 5 wherein the comparator is “

equal to.”

16. The method of claim 4 where the command defines an output type.

17. The method of claim 4 where the target concept is selected from a group of concepts, the group of concepts being predefined associations of sets of data.

18. The method of claim 4 where the relationship defines how a concept is related to either a value, comparitor or another concept.

19. The method of claim 5 where the comparitor defines a mathematical, spatial, temporal, or logical relationship.

20. The method of claim 10 further comprising a third set of optional elements.