INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE (IAT) RATIONALITY DIAGNOSTIC WITH AN ENGINE BLOCK HEATER

• US 20090182489A1
• Filed: 01/16/2008
• Published: 07/16/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/16/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Inventors: Sheffer, Timothy K., Yang, Koon Chul
• Application Number:
  US12/015,030
• Publication Number:
  US 20090182489A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/113
• CPC Class Codes: F01P 2025/32 Engine outcoming fluid temperature
• CPC Class Codes: F01P 2031/30 Cooling after the engine is stopped
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2041/1433 using a model or simulation of the system
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2200/0414 Air temperature
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2400/08 Redundant elements, e.g. two sensors for measuring the same parameter
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/062 for starting F02D41/061 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/22 Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions in air/fuel ratio feedback systems F02D41/1495, in electric control linkage F02D11/107, in purge control systems F02M25/0809
• CPC Class Codes: F02N 19/10 by heating of engine coolants

Abstract

A first method is suitable for vehicles having an ambient temperature sensor and employs an estimation model configured to estimate a minimum start-up engine coolant temperature (SUECT) if the engine block heater was operated during the previous soak period. A measured SUECT is then compared to estimated minimum SUECT from the model, and if it is higher, then the diagnostic logic concludes that the engine block heater was operated during the soak period, and disables the reporting its test results. A second method is suitable for vehicles without an ambient (soak) temperature sensor employs an alternative approach. Predetermined data based on actual vehicle testing over a wide range of conditions is stored in a data structure. The data describe respective minimum and maximum start-up IAT thresholds versus SUECT. The thresholds are spaced apart to define a start-up IAT window in between. In other words, the window is bounded by minimum and maximum start-up IAT thresholds. For any measured SUECT, a particular window will be set. If the measured start-up IAT falls within the window, then the engine block heater was operated during the soak period.

Claims

1. A method of conducting an intake air temperature (IAT) rationality test in a vehicle with an engine having an engine block heater, said method comprising the steps of:

determining that vehicle soak conditions meet predetermined criteria for the test, including a duration of a soak period and commencing the test at a start-up time; and

determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period; and

discontinuing the rationality test when the engine block heater has been determined to have been operated during the soak period.

2. The method of claim 1 further including the steps of:

determining that the engine block heater was not used during the soak period; and

thereafter assessing a temperature difference between a start-up engine coolant temperature (ECT) and a start-up IAT each taken at the start-up time.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said assessing step includes the substeps of:

establishing a first temperature threshold corresponding to a minimum IAT skew level;

generating a pass indication with respect to the IAT rationality test when the temperature difference is less than or equal to the first temperature threshold.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein said assessing step includes the substeps of:

establishing a first temperature threshold corresponding to a minimum IAT skew level;

initiating a secondary drift check when the temperature difference is greater than the first temperature threshold wherein the secondary drift check comprises the substep of;

generating a fail indication when an absolute difference between a monitored IAT taken during the secondary drift check and the start-up IAT does not exceed a drift threshold prior to the expiration of a predetermined time;

discontinuing the secondary drift check when the absolute difference exceeds the drift threshold prior to the expiration of the predetermined time.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of discontinuing the IAT rationality test is performed without report as to the result of such test.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period includes the substep of:

verifying that boundary conditions for use of an ECT estimation model are satisfied.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was used during the soak period includes the substeps of:

estimating a minimum engine coolant temperature (ECT) at the start-up time in accordance with the ECT estimation model; and

determining that the engine block heater was operated during the soak period when the start-up ECT exceeds the estimated minimum ECT from the model.

8. The method of claim 7 further including the step of:

determining that the engine block heater was not operated during the soak period when the start-up ECT is equal to or less than the estimated minimum ECT from the model.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein said estimating substep includes:

measuring a start-up ambient temperature at the start-up time; and

evaluating the ECT estimation model using stored ambient temperature and engine coolant temperatures both taken before the soak period, the start-up ECT, the start-up ambient temperature and the duration of the soak period.

10. The method of claim 2 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period includes the substep of:

verifying that predicate conditions are satisfied wherein the conditions include (1) the temperature difference between start-up ECT and IAT exceeding a first temperature threshold corresponding to a minimum IAT skew level;

(2) the start-up ECT being within a range between a second temperature threshold and a third temperature threshold; and

(3) the start-up IAT being less than a fourth temperature threshold.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period includes the substeps of:

determining respective minimum and maximum start-up IAT (SUIAT) thresholds using predetermined SUIAT data as a function of the start-up ECT (SUECT); and

determining that the engine block heater was operated during the soak period when the start-up IAT is between the minimum and maximum SUIAT thresholds.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period includes the substeps of:

determining respective minimum and maximum start-up IAT (SUIAT) thresholds using predetermined SUIAT data as a function of the start-up ECT (SUECT); and

generating a fail indication when the SUIAT is less than the minimum SUIAT threshold.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period includes the substeps of:

determining respective minimum and maximum start-up IAT (SUIAT) thresholds using predetermined SUIAT data as a function of the start-up ECT (SUECT); and

determining that the engine block heater was not operated during the soak period when the SUIAT is greater than the maximum SUIAT threshold.

14. In a vehicle having an engine with an engine block heater, a method of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during a soak period, comprising the steps of:

verifying that boundary conditions for use of an ECT estimation model are satisfied.

estimating a minimum engine coolant temperature (ECT) at a start-up time in accordance with the ECT estimation model; and

determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period based on a comparison of a start-up ECT and the estimated minimum ECT from the model.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said determining step includes the sub-step of:

determining that the engine block heater was operated during the soak period when the start-up ECT is greater than the estimated minimum ECT from the model.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein said determining step includes the sub-step of:

determining that the engine block heater was not operated during the soak period when the start-up ECT is equal to or less than the estimated minimum ECT from the model.

17. The method of claim 14 wherein said estimating step includes the sub-steps of:

measuring a start-up ambient temperature at the start-up time; and

evaluating the ECT estimation model using stored ambient temperature and engine coolant temperatures both taken before the soak period, the start-up ECT, the start-up ambient temperature and a duration of the soak period.

18. In a vehicle having an engine with an engine block heater, a method of determining whether the engine block heater was operated during a soak period, comprising the steps of:

verifying that predetermined predicate conditions based on a start-up engine coolant temperature (SUECT) and a start-up intake air temperature (SUIAT) are satisfied wherein the SUECT and SUIAT are taken after the soak period upon start-up of the engine;

determining respective minimum and maximum SUIAT thresholds using predetermined SUIAT data as a function of the SUECT; and

determining whether the engine block heater was operated during the soak period based on a comparison of the SUIAT and the minimum and maximum SUIAT thresholds.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the conditions include (1) the temperature difference between the SUECT and the SUIAT exceeding a first temperature threshold corresponding to a minimum IAT skew level;

(2) the SUECT being within a range between a second temperature threshold and a third temperature threshold; and

(3) the SUIAT being less than a fourth temperature threshold.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated includes the sub-step of:

determining that the engine block heater was operated during the soak period when the SUIAT is between the minimum and maximum SUIAT thresholds.

21. The method of claim 18 wherein said step of determining whether the engine block heater was operated includes the sub-step of:

determining that the engine block heater was not operated during the soak period when the SUIAT is greater than the maximum SUIAT threshold or less than the minimum SUIAT threshold.