ACCURATE MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS

• US 20090182534A1
• Filed: 01/11/2008
• Published: 07/16/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/11/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Loboz, Charles Z.
• Application Number:
  US11/972,624
• Publication Number:
  US 20090182534A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/186
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3476 Data logging G06F11/14, G06F11/2205 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/348 Circuit details, i.e. tracer hardware

Abstract

Described is a technology that improves the quality of data collected during computer system monitoring for subsequent analysis via dynamic adjustment, prediction, and/or elapsed collection time considerations. An interval is computed from an actual iteration start time and a desired interval; a subsequent data collection iteration occurs after a sleep time based on the computed interval. The sleep time may be based on an elapsed data collection time that accounts for delays in collecting the data, and/or based on a prediction obtained from historical data such as past iteration start times. When recorded, the elapsed data collection times may be used as a measure of error and/or for estimating an actual read time for a given iteration'"'"'s counter read, as well as to estimate a number of processor time slices taken to collect the data, which may be used in the time estimate and/or in the measure of error.

Claims

1. In a computing environment, a method comprising:

(a) initializing a computer system monitoring test to obtain a data set comprising data corresponding to a computer system'"'"'s states over a plurality of iterations;

(b) in a current iteration, collecting data corresponding to the computer system state and computing a computed interval based upon an actual start time associated with this current iteration and a desired interval;

(c) waiting for the computed interval; and

(d) returning to step (b) until the test is complete.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein initializing the computer system monitoring test comprises receiving a set of counters to be collected, and wherein collecting the data corresponding to the computer system state comprises reading the counters.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein computing the interval includes adjusting a sleep time based on a prediction obtained from historical data.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein computing the computed interval includes determining an elapsed data collection time to account for any delay in collecting the data.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein computing the computed interval includes determining a sleep time based upon the actual start time and the elapsed data collection time.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising adjusting the sleep time based on a prediction obtained from historical data corresponding to one or more previous iterations.

7. The method of claim 4 further comprising recording the elapsed data collection time in association with the data collected in the current iteration.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising using the elapsed data collection time as a measure of error for analyzing the data collected in the current iteration.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein collecting the data comprises reading a set of counters, and further comprising, for at least some of the counters, using the elapsed data collection time in estimating a time value corresponding to when each counter was actually read.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein computing the interval includes determining an elapsed data collection time, and further comprising, estimating a number of processor time slices taken to collect the data based on the elapsed data collection time.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein collecting the data comprises reading a set of counters, and further comprising, for at least some of the counters, using the estimated number of processor time slices in estimating a time value corresponding to when each counter was actually read.

12. The method of claim 10 further comprising using the estimated number of processor time slices as a measure of error for analyzing the data collected in the current iteration.

13. In a computing environment, a system comprising, a software monitor coupled to a set of counters that indicate a state of a computer system, the software monitor reading the set of counters over a number of iterations and associating each iteration with a time value corresponding to when the iteration began, the software monitor including a dynamic adjustment mechanism that dynamically adjusts a sampling interval for starting a next iteration based on an actual start time associated with a current iteration, or a dynamic delay prediction mechanism that dynamically adjusts a sampling interval based on historical data as to when one or more previous iterations have actually started, or a combination of a dynamic adjustment mechanism and a delay prediction mechanism.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein the software monitor further comprises means for determining and recording an elapsed data collection time corresponding to an actual time taken to read the set of counters.

15. The system of claim 14 further comprising, a data collection time compensation mechanism that uses the elapsed data collection time to estimate when at least some of the counters were actually read relative to the time value, or an error measure mechanism that uses the elapsed data collection time as a measure of error associated with at least some of the counter values of at least some of the iterations, or a combination of a data collection time compensation mechanism and an error measure mechanism.

16. The system of claim 15 further comprising means for estimating a number of one or more processor time slices corresponding to the elapsed data collection time, and for at least some of the counters, the data collection time compensation mechanism using the number in the estimate of when at least some of the counters were actually read relative to the time value, or the error measure mechanism using the number in at least one measure of error, or both the data collection time compensation mechanism using the number in the estimate of when at least some of the counters were actually read relative to the time value and the error measure mechanism using the number in at least one measure of error.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 16 having further computer-executable instructions comprising estimating at least one error measure based on the elapsed data collection time.

17. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions, which when executed perform steps, comprising:

(a) obtaining a desired iteration interval for reading a set of counters in a monitoring test over a plurality of iterations;

(b) obtaining a first current system time;

(c) reading a set of counter values and recording the set of counter values in association with a timestamp corresponding to the first current system time;

(d) obtaining a second current system time and determining an elapsed data collection time based on the first and second current system times;

(e) computing a sleep time based upon the first and second current system times and the desired iteration interval;

(f) waiting for the sleep time; and

(g) returning to step (b) for a further iteration until the monitoring test is complete.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 having further computer-executable instructions comprising adjusting the sleep time prior to step (f) based on a prediction computed from historical data corresponding to one or more previous iterations.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 having further computer-executable instructions comprising estimating at least one actual time a counter value was read based on the elapsed data collection time.