OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF A RESTRICTION SYSTEM

• US 20090187202A1
• Filed: 01/17/2008
• Published: 07/23/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/17/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (Johnson & Johnson)
• Original Assignee: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (Johnson & Johnson)
• Inventors: Ortiz, Mark S., Dlugos, Daniel F. JR., Marcotte, Amy L.
• Application Number:
  US12/015,634
• Publication Number:
  US 20090187202A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 606/157
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 5/0053 remotely adjustable

Abstract

Methods and devices for optimizing the operation of a restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient are disclosed. In one exemplary embodiment, a method for optimizing the operation of a gastric restriction system includes providing an implantable restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, determining an optimum value of a control parameter of the restriction system, and maintaining the control parameter at the optimum value such that a result parameter of the restriction system is substantially convergent as a function of time. Determining an optimum value of a control parameter can generally include adjusting the restriction device, determining the value of the control parameter to be optimized, and repeating the steps of adjusting the restriction device and determining the value of the control parameter until the control parameter is substantially convergent as a function of time.

Claims

1. A method for determining an optimum control parameter of a restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, comprising:

providing an implantable restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, the system including an adjustable restriction device configured to form a restriction in a patient;

adjusting the restriction device;

determining the value of a control parameter of the restriction system; and

repeating the steps of adjusting the restriction device and determining the value of the control parameter until the control parameter is substantially convergent as a function of time.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing the determined value of the control parameter to a previously determined value of the control parameter.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the restriction device is adjusted if the determined value of the control parameter is not substantially equal to the previously determined value of the control parameter.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein substantially equal includes variations in the value of the control parameter in the range of about 5-10%.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes tightening the restriction device if the determined value of the control parameter is less than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes loosening the restriction device if the determined value of the control parameter is greater than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein substantially convergent includes variations in the value of the control parameter in the range of about 5-10% over time.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the control parameter is the pressure within the restriction system.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the control parameter is at least one of the peristaltic pulse event, the peristaltic pulse width, the peristaltic pulse duration, the peristaltic pulse amplitude, and the flow rate of a bolus into the stomach.

10. A method for optimizing the operation of a restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, comprising:

providing an implantable restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, the system including an adjustable restriction device configured to form a restriction in a patient;

determining an optimum value of a control parameter of the restriction system by adjusting the restriction device until the control parameter is substantially convergent as a function of time; and

maintaining the control parameter at the optimum value such that a result parameter of the restriction system is substantially convergent as a function of time.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the optimum value of the control parameter includes detecting a value of the control parameter and comparing the detected value to a previously determined value of the control parameter.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes tightening the restriction device if the detected value of the control parameter is less than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes loosening the restriction device if the detected value of the control parameter is greater than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein substantially convergent includes variations in the value of the control parameter in the range of about 5-10% over time.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein substantially convergent includes variations in the value of the result parameter in the range of about 5-10% over time.

16. The method of claim 10, wherein the control parameter is the pressure within the restriction system.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein the control parameter is at least one of the peristaltic pulse event, the peristaltic pulse width, the peristaltic pulse duration, the peristaltic pulse amplitude, and the flow rate of a bolus into the stomach.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein the result parameter is at least one of the body mass index of the patient, the weight of the patient, the weight change of the patient, and the percent excess weight lost by the patient.

19. A method for optimizing the operation of a restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, comprising:

providing an implantable restriction system for forming a restriction in a patient, the system including an adjustable restriction device configured to form a restriction in a patient;

determining an optimum value of a control parameter of the restriction system by adjusting the restriction device until the control parameter substantially converges on a value over time; and

maintaining the control parameter at the optimum value such that a result parameter of the restriction system has a substantial convergence over time.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein determining the optimum value of the control parameter includes detecting a value of the control parameter and comparing the detected value to a previously determined value of the control parameter.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes tightening the restriction device if the detected value of the control parameter is less than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein adjusting the restriction device includes loosening the restriction device if the detected value of the control parameter is greater than the previously determined value of the control parameter.

23. The method of claim 19, wherein substantially converges includes variations in the value of the control parameter in the range of about 5-10% over time.

24. The method of claim 19, wherein substantial convergence includes variations in the value of the result parameter in the range of about 5-10% over time.

25. The method of claim 19, wherein the control parameter is at least one of the pressure within the restriction system, the peristaltic pulse event, the peristaltic pulse width, the peristaltic pulse duration, the peristaltic pulse amplitude, and the flow rate of a bolus into the stomach.

26. The method of claim 19, wherein the result parameter is at least one of the body mass index of the patient, the weight of the patient, the weight change of the patient, and the percent excess weight lost by the patient.