SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

• US 20090192849A1
• Filed: 11/07/2008
• Published: 07/30/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 11/09/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: TopCoder, Inc. (Wipro Limited)
• Original Assignee: TopCoder, Inc. (Wipro Limited)
• Inventors: Williams, Jessica C., Ramkissoon, Sarah C., Horgan, Denis, Tsipolitis, George, Hughes, John M., Lydon, Michael, Campion, Sean, Messinger, David
• Application Number:
  US12/267,509
• Publication Number:
  US 20090192849A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.11
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/10 Requirements analysis; Specification techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/101 Collaborative creation, e.g. joint development of products or services

Abstract

In general, in one aspect, a method for developing software by contest includes hosting a series of contests for the agile development of a software application by contest. In one embodiment, the method includes holding a contest for the development of a wireframe, holding a contest for the development of a static prototype, and holding a contest for the development of a working prototype. In some embodiments, the contests are repeated so as to iteratively modify the software application to better meet the customer'"'"'s needs. In some embodiments, the working prototype is the final implementation of the software application. In some embodiments, a competition is held for the development of an application specification based on the working prototype.

Claims

1. A method for creating a deliverable comprising holding a series of on-line competitions using a competition management system, each of the competitions for the development of one or more assets, a number of which assets together comprise the deliverable, wherein each of the competitions to be held are selected based on the desired characteristics of the deliverable.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the competitions are selected from choices of competition types offered by the competition management system.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the competitions to be held are selected automatically based on the desired deliverable.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the competitions to be held are selected by an administrator.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein some of the competitions are selected from a list of competitions to be held produced as part of an asset developed through one of the competitions.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein a first series of competitions for development of assets are specified and held, after which a second series of competitions are held based on the list of competitions specified as an asset developed through one of the competitions.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein holding a competition comprises specifying start date/time, end date/time, prize, and specification of the asset to be developed.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the customer for the deliverable accesses the competition management system directly to request and initiate the series of competitions.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the assets are software designs.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the assets are requirements descriptions.

11. A method for developing software, comprising holding a series of on-line competitions using a competition management system, wherein individuals compete against each other to develop and submit assets, which are then judged and a winner selected, the method comprising:

holding a competition for the development of an application specification in which a winning application specification is selected;

holding an architecture competition for the development of application architecture based on the winning application specification in which a winning application architecture is selected, wherein the winning application architecture comprises specification of components;

holding one or more component design competitions for a respective one or more of the specified application components in which a winning component design is selected in each component design competition, each respective winning design comprising component design documentation;

holding component development competitions for development of components based on the winning designs, the components comprising an implementation of the winning design; and

holding an assembly competition for assembly of the components specified in the winning application architecture in which a winning assembled application is selected.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising holding a testing competition for development of tests for testing of the winning application.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising holding a competition for the development of a wireframe in which a winning wireframe is selected.

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising holding a competition for the development of user interface design.

15. The method of claim 11, further comprising holding a competition for the development of a static prototype based on a storyboard developed by competition, a wireframe developed by competition, or both, and the winning application specification.

16. The method of claim 11, further comprising holding a competition for the translation of the application interface into another human language.

17. A competition management system for holding a series of on-line competitions for developing software, such that individuals compete against each other to develop and submit assets, which are then judged and a winner selected, the system comprising:

an application specification competition subsystem for holding a competition for the development of an application specification in which a winning application specification is selected;

an architecture competition subsystem for holding an architecture competition for the development of application architecture based on the winning application specification in which a winning application architecture is selected, wherein the winning application architecture comprises specification of components;

a component design subsystem for holding one or more component design competitions for a respective one or more of the specified application components in which a winning component design is selected in each component design competition, each respective winning design comprising component design documentation;

a component development subsystem for holding component development competitions for development of components based on the winning designs, the components comprising an implementation of the winning design; and

an assembly competition subsystem for holding an assembly competition for assembly of the components specified in the winning application architecture in which a winning assembled application is selected.

18. The system of claim 17, further comprising a creative design subsystem for holding a competition for the development of graphic design elements of the software application.

19. The system of claim 18, further comprising a user interface design subsystem for holding a competition for the development of user interface design.

20. The system of claim 17, further comprising a translation competition subsystem for holding a competition for the translation of text into another human language.

21. A method for developing software, comprising holding a series of on-line competitions using a competition management system, the method comprising:

holding a competition for the development of a wireframe;

holding a competition for the development of a storyboard based on the winning wireframe;

holding a competition for the development of a static prototype based on the winning storyboard.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the storyboard comprises a visual design for the software user interface.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the static prototype comprises a HTML prototype.

24. The method of claim 21, further comprising holding a competition for the development of a working prototype.

25. The method of claim 21, further comprising holding a competition for the development of an application based on the working prototype.

26. The method of claim 21, further comprising holding a competition for the development user interface elements based on the static prototype and an application programming interface specification.

27. The method of claim 21, further comprising holding a competition for the translation of the working prototype into another language.

28. The method of claim 21, wherein the winner of the competition to develop the storyboard is selected by the customer.

29. A method for developing software, comprising:

developing a wireframe;

holding a competition for the development of a static prototype based on the wireframe;

holding a competition for the development of a working prototype based on the static prototype.

30. The method of claim 29 further comprising holding a competition for the development of an application specification based on the working prototype in which a winning application specification based on the working prototype is selected.

31. A method of creating a specification specifying the requirements for an asset, comprising:

providing an electronic form on a competition management system for completion by a customer, the form specifying information about a desired asset;

providing the completed form on the competition management system to competitors in a competition to define the requirements for the asset;

providing on the competition management system a communications forum shared among competitors and the customer for discussing the information in the electronic form and the customer'"'"'s desired requirements;

conducting via the competition management system a competition for the development of a requirements specification for the asset based on the electronic form and the communications forum, in which competitors each submit a requirements specification and the customer selects the winning specification.

32. A method of creating a specification specifying the requirements for an asset, comprising:

receiving by a competition management system a request by a customer to conduct a competition for the development of an asset;

providing by the competition management system an electronic form for completion by the customer, the form specifying information about a desired asset;

designating a competition type based on the information provided by the customer in the completed electronic form;

designating competition rules based on the competition type;

conducting via the competition management system a competition for the development of the asset based on the information in the electronic form, in which competitors each submit an asset and the customer selects the winning asset from among the submitted asset.

33. The method of claim 32, further comprising providing by the competition management system a communications forum shared among the competitors and the customer for discussing the information in the electronic form and the customer'"'"'s desired requirements for the asset.

34. A method for conducting competitions, comprising:

requesting via a browser in communication with a competition management system a number of competitions for the development of an asset by specifying prizes and participation criteria for each of the number of competitions; and

monitoring progress of each of the number of competitions via the browser in communication with the competition management system.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising, granting access to the progress of the number of competitions to an individual other than the individual who requested the number of competitions, and monitoring by the individual other than the individual who requested the competitions the progress of each of the number of competitions via the browser in communication with the competition management system.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the access is granted to a customer.

37. The method of claim 35, wherein the access is granted to an individual member of the community serving as a deliverable manager.

38. The method of claim 35, wherein the progress of the number of competitions is displayed on a single web page.

39. The method of claim 35, wherein at least one of the number of competitions comprises multiple stages, in which winners of the first stage compete to win a second stage.

40. A method for creating a deliverable through the efforts of a community of developers using a competition management system, comprising:

providing indicia for performance of members of the community when serving as a deliverable manager;

facilitating selection of an individual member of the community of the developers to serve as the deliverable manager based at least in part on the provided indicia;

facilitating specification and management of a series of competitions by the selected individual member using the competition management system; and

updating the indicia for performance of the selected individual member based on the specification and management of the series of competitions.

41. The method of claim 40, wherein the performance of the deliverable manager is determined at least in part by the successful completion of the deliverable.

42. The method of claim 40, wherein the performance of the deliverable manager may be determined at least in part by the timing of delivery.

43. The method of claim 40, wherein the performance of the deliverable manager may be determined at least in part by the rating of the deliverable manager by a customer using the competition management system according to a scorecard.

44. The method of claim 43, wherein the scorecard comprises determination of the accuracy of the pricing predictions of the deliverable manager.

45. The method of claim 43, wherein the scorecard comprises determination of the accuracy of the timing predictions of the deliverable manager.

46. A competition management system for creating a deliverable through the efforts of a community of developers, comprising:

a deliverable manager selection system for facilitating selection of an individual member of the community of the developers to serve as a deliverable manager for a project based at least in part on provided indicia;

a competition specification system for facilitating specification and management of a series of competitions by the selected individual member using the competition management system; and

a deliverable manager rating system for providing indicia of performance of members of the community when serving as a deliverable manager and for updating the indicia for performance of the selected individual member based on the specification and management of the series of competitions.

47. The competition management system of claim 46 wherein the competition management system comprises tools for communication between the selected deliverable manager and the customer associated with a project.

48. The competition management system of claim 47 wherein the customer and the deliverable manager can both access a page providing the status of competitions for the project.