Defining An SOA Strategy For A Service Oriented Architecture

• US 20090198537A1
• Filed: 02/04/2008
• Published: 08/06/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 02/04/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Brown, William A., Holley, Kerrie L., Moore, Garrison A., Tegan, William J.
• Application Number:
  US12/025,340
• Publication Number:
  US 20090198537A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.36
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals

Abstract

Methods and systems for defining SOA strategy for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘SOA’) are described that include identifying, in dependence upon a business'"'"'s SOA vision and one or more artifacts describing a current state of a business'"'"'s SOA, one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business; assessing a current service maturity level of the business'"'"'s SOA; determining a target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA; and developing an SOA strategic plan to reach the target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA, the SOA strategic plan including an identification of the one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business.

Claims

1. A method of defining SOA strategy for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘

SOA’

), the method comprising;

identifying, in dependence upon a business'"'"'s SOA vision and one or more artifacts describing a current state of a business'"'"'s SOA, one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business;

assessing a current service maturity level of the business'"'"'s SOA;

determining a target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA; and

developing an SOA strategic plan to reach the target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA, the SOA strategic plan including an identification of the one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

presenting the SOA strategic plan to the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders for approval; and

if the business'"'"'s stakeholders disapprove the SOA strategic plan, developing a revised SOA strategic plan to reach the target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

presenting the SOA strategic plan to the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders for approval; and

if the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders approve the SOA strategic plan;

mapping to the developed SOA strategic plan, in dependence upon a project plan for a particular project of implementing one or more candidate services within the business'"'"'s SOA, project-specific goals;

identifying, in dependence upon the mapping of project-specific goals to the developed SOA strategic plan, one or more of candidate services to implement; and

determining whether implementation of the identified one or more candidate services is viable.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising:

approving, by any relevant business'"'"'s stakeholders if the implementation of the identified one or more services is viable, the implementation of the identified services;

determining that the approved implementation of the identified services is compliant with the business'"'"'s standards and policies; and

communicating, to one or more relevant business'"'"'s members, a description of the implementation of the identified services.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein communicating, to one or more relevant business'"'"'s members, a description of the implementation of the identified services further comprises:

tailoring, for communication in dependence upon classifications of members of the business, the description of the implementation of the identified services.

6. The method of claim 3 further comprising:

appealing, if the implementation of the identified one or more services is not viable, the determination that the implementation of the candidate service is not viable to an Architectural Review Board (‘

ARB’

).

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

receiving, from the ARB, an opinion as to whether implementation of the candidate service is viable; and

if the opinion of the ARB is that implementation of the candidate service is not viable;

developing an alternative implementation of the candidate service that is viable.

8. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

receiving, from the ARB, an opinion as to whether implementation of the candidate service is viable; and

if the opinion of the ARB is that implementation of the candidate service is viable;

approving, by the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders, the implementation of the candidate service;

determining that the approved implementation of the candidate service is compliant with the business'"'"'s standards and policies; and

communicating, to one or more relevant members of the business, a description of the implementation of the candidate service.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

gathering metrics describing effectiveness of one or more steps of the method of defining an SOA strategy for the business'"'"'s SOA; and

modifying, in dependence upon the gathered metrics, the method of defining an SOA strategy.

10. A system of defining SOA strategy for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘

SOA’

), the system comprising;

means for identifying, in dependence upon a business'"'"'s SOA vision and one or more artifacts describing a current state of a business'"'"'s SOA, one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business;

means for assessing a current service maturity level of the business'"'"'s SOA;

means for determining a target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA; and

means for developing an SOA strategic plan to reach the target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA, the SOA strategic plan including an identification of the one or more SOA opportunity areas for the business.

11. The system of claim 10 further comprising:

means for presenting the SOA strategic plan to the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders for approval; and

means for developing, if the business'"'"'s stakeholders disapprove the SOA strategic plan, a revised SOA strategic plan to reach the target service maturity level for the business'"'"'s SOA.

12. The system of claim 10 further comprising:

means for presenting the SOA strategic plan to the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders for approval; and

if the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders approve the SOA strategic plan;

means for mapping to the developed SOA strategic plan, in dependence upon a project plan for a particular project of implementing one or more candidate services within the business'"'"'s SOA, project-specific goals;

means for identifying, in dependence upon the mapping of project-specific goals to the developed SOA strategic plan, one or more of candidate services to implement; and

means for determining whether implementation of the identified one or more candidate services is viable.

13. The system of claim 12 further comprising:

means for approving, by any relevant business'"'"'s stakeholders if the implementation of the identified one or more services is viable, the implementation of the identified services;

means for determining that the approved implementation of the identified services is compliant with the business'"'"'s standards and policies; and

means for communicating, to one or more relevant business'"'"'s members, a description of the implementation of the identified services.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein communicating, to one or more relevant business'"'"'s members, a description of the implementation of the identified services further comprises means for:

tailoring, for communication in dependence upon classifications of members of the business, the description of the implementation of the identified services.

15. The system of claim 12 further comprising:

means for appealing, if the implementation of the identified one or more services is not viable, the determination that the implementation of the candidate service is not viable to an Architectural Review Board (‘

ARB’

).

16. The system of claim 15 further comprising:

means for receiving, from the ARB, an opinion as to whether implementation of the candidate service is viable; and

if the opinion of the ARB is that implementation of the candidate service is not viable;

means for developing an alternative implementation of the candidate service that is viable.

17. The system of claim 15 further comprising:

means for receiving, from the ARB, an opinion as to whether implementation of the candidate service is viable; and

if the opinion of the ARB is that implementation of the candidate service is viable;

means for approving, by the business'"'"'s relevant stakeholders, the implementation of the candidate service;

means for determining that the approved implementation of the candidate service is compliant with the business'"'"'s standards and policies; and

means for communicating, to one or more relevant members of the business, a description of the implementation of the candidate service.

18. The system of claim 10 further comprising:

means for gathering metrics describing effectiveness of one or more steps of the system of defining an SOA strategy for the business'"'"'s SOA; and

means for modifying, in dependence upon the gathered metrics, the system of defining an SOA strategy.