CENTRALIZED SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE METRICS

• US 20090199160A1
• Filed: 01/31/2008
• Published: 08/06/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Oath Inc. (Verizon Communications Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Yahoo! Inc. (Apollo Global Management, Inc.)
• Inventors: Panigrahi, Sapan, Nelson, Stephen, Vaitheeswaran, Girish, Wu, George, Bretoi, Daniel
• Application Number:
  US12/023,613
• Publication Number:
  US 20090199160A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/124
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3409 for performance assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3414 Workload generation, e.g. scripts, playback
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3476 Data logging G06F11/14, G06F11/2205 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3684 for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3688 for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites

Abstract

Using a testing framework, developers may create a test module to centralize resources and results for a software test plan amongst a plurality of systems. With assistance from the testing framework, the test module may facilitate the creation of test cases, the execution of a test job for each test case, the collection of performance statistics during each test job, and the aggregation of collected statistics into organized reports for easier analysis. The test module may track test results for easy comparison of performance metrics in response to various conditions and environments over the history of the development process. The testing framework may also schedule a test job for execution when the various systems and resources required by the test job are free. The testing framework may be operating system independent, so that a single test job may test software concurrently on a variety of systems.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for testing application performance comprising the steps of:

receiving, at a testing framework, input identifying (a) a test plan for testing specific software, and (b) one or more attributes;

wherein the one or more attributes define input parameters for a test module for said software;

based on said one or more attributes, a test module generator within the testing framework generating said test module for testing performance of the specific software;

wherein the test module generated by the test module generator is configured to receive values for the input parameters defined by the one or more attributes;

executing a test job during which said test module initiates execution of the test plan based on specific values for said input parameters; and

the testing framework gathering performance statistics related to execution of the software.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the specific software is first specific software;

the test module is a first test module; and

the method further comprises;

receiving, at said testing framework, input identifying (a) a second test plan for testing said second specific software, and (b) a second set of one or more attributes;

wherein the second set of one or more attributes define second input parameters for a second test module for said second specific software;

based on said second set of one or more attributes, said test module generator within the testing framework generating said second test module for testing performance of said second specific software;

wherein the second test module is configured to receive values for the second input parameters;

executing a second test job during which said second test module initiates execution of said second test plan based on specific values for said second input parameters; and

the testing framework gathering performance statistics related to execution of the second specified software.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein:

during execution of the first test job, the first specific software executes on a first machine that has a first operating system; and

during execution of the second test job, the second specific software executes on second machine that has a second operating system that is different from the first operating system.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

executing a second test job during which said test module initiates execution of the test plan based on a second set of specific values for said input parameters; and

the testing framework gathering a second set of performance statistics related to execution of the software.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of said testing framework generating a user interface for said test module, wherein said user interface features controls for comparing performance statistics for the test job with the second set of performance statistics for the second test job.

6. The method of claim 1 comprising the step of said testing framework generating a user interface for the test module, wherein the user interface comprises controls for specifying said specific values for said input parameters.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said specific values for said input parameters are based on values stored by the test module in a template.

8. The method of claim 1 the step of said testing framework gathering performance statistics comprises the step of said testing framework determining (a) a set of performance metrics to gather and (b) a set of systems from which to gather said set of performance metrics, wherein said determining is based on at least one of said specific values.

9. The method of claim 1 the step of said testing framework gathering performance statistics comprises the step of said testing framework determining (a) a set of performance metrics to gather and (b) a set of systems from which to gather said set of performance metrics, wherein said determining is not based on the set of said specific values.

12. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 1.

13. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 2.

14. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 3.

15. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 4.

16. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 5.

17. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 6.

18. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 7.

19. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 8.

20. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 9.

10. A computer-implemented method for displaying a test result, comprising the steps of:

displaying a plurality of data reports, each of said data reports belonging to said test result;

displaying one or more controls for associating data reports with a custom view;

via one of said one or more controls, receiving input associating a first data report with said custom view of said test result;

via one of said one or more controls, receiving input identifying a second data report with said custom view of said test result;

receiving a request to display the custom view of said test result;

displaying the custom view of said test result, wherein said custom view includes the first data report and the second data report.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

in response to receiving input associating said first data with said custom view, storing first custom view template information,

wherein said first custom view template information comprises data indicating a first performance metric for which said first data report comprises values;

in response to receiving input associating said second data with said custom view, storing second custom view template information,

wherein said second custom view template information comprises data indicating a second performance metric for which said second data report comprises values; and

in response to a request to display data from a second test result, automatically generating a second custom view,

wherein the second custom view comprises a third data report from said second test result, wherein the third data report comprises values for the first performance metric;

wherein the second custom view comprises a fourth data report from said second test result, wherein the fourth data report comprises values for the second performance metric.

21. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 10.

22. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 11.