Authenticity Determination

• US 20090201129A1
• Filed: 04/07/2006
• Published: 08/13/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/07/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Robert Lane Superannuation Pty, Surpion Pty Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Stannards Accountants, Surpion Pty Ltd.
• Inventors: Lane, Robert, Suhr, Mark
• Application Number:
  US11/910,728
• Publication Number:
  US 20090201129A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/10.100
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/00 Commerce
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/2462 Asset location systems combined with EAS inventory, tracking, logistic G06Q10/00; entrance control systems G07C9/00

Abstract

A method of determining the authenticity of an article. The method utilises a tag having a tag data store, which is coupled to the article. The method includes in a tag reader, determining article information from the tag data store. The article information is then compared to predetermined information obtained from the tag store, a database, a second tag provided on the article or the article itself, thereby allowing the article to be authenticated based on the result of the comparison. This can be used for offering reduced insurance premiums.

Claims

1. A method of determining the authenticity of an article, the method utilizing a tag having a tag data store, and wherein the method includes:

a) in a tag reader, determining article information from the tag data store;

b) comparing the article information to predetermined information, the predetermined information being obtained from at least one of.

i) the tag store;

ii) a database;

iii) a second tag provided on the article; and

,

iv) the article; and

,

c) authenticating the article dependent on the result of the comparison.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method includes, in the tag reader, and in response to determining the article information, at least one of:

a) displaying the article information to allow visual comparison with the predetermined information; and

,

b) comparing the article information to the predetermined information.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined information includes a digital signature and wherein the method includes, in the tag reader, at least one of:

a) decrypting the digital signature and comparing the decrypted digital signature to the article information; and

,

b) encrypting the article information and comparing the encrypted article information to the digital signature.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the article information is at least partially encrypted to thereby prevent unauthorized access or alteration of the article information.

5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the article information includes:

a) a payload, the payload including the article information encrypted using a secret key; and

,

b) a header, the header being indicative of the secret key, and wherein method includes, in the tag reader;

i) determining, from the header, an indication of the secret key;

ii) obtaining the secret key from a data store using the secret key indication; and

,

iii) decrypting the payload using the secret key.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method includes, in a tag reader:

a) determining an operator identifier indicative of an identity of an operator;

b) authenticating the operator using the operator identifier; and

,

c) authenticating the article in response to a successful operator authentication.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the method includes, in the tag reader:

a) receiving the operator identifier from the operator;

b) comparing the operator identifier to a number of predetermined operator identifiers stored in a data store; and

,

c) authenticating the operator in response to a successful comparison, wherein the operator identifier includes at least one of;

i) a biometric signature;

ii) a password; and

,

iii) a PIN.

8. A method according to claim 6, wherein the method includes, in the tag reader:

a) determining from the article information at least one article information access level;

b) determining using the operator identifier and from operator details stored in a data store, one or more operator access levels;

c) comparing the article information access levels to the operator access levels; and

,

d) authenticating the article in response to a successful comparison.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the tag is an REID tag, and wherein the method includes, in the tag reader, determining the identifier by:

a) generating a read signal, the tag being responsive to the read signal to modulate the read signal in accordance with the article information;

b) detecting modulation of the read signal; and

,

c) determining the article information using the detected modulation.

10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the article information includes at least one of:

a) a unique article id;

b) manufacture information;

c) purchase information;

d) sales information;

e) insurance details; and

,

f) owner details.

11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one tag is embedded within the article.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the at least one tag is embedded within the article during manufacture.

13. A method according to claim 1, wherein the article information is locked so that it cannot be altered.

14. A method according to claim 1, wherein the article is a vehicle.

15. A method according to claim 14, wherein the article is a bicycle, and wherein the method is used for obtaining an insurance premium reduction relating to the bicycle.

16. Apparatus for determining the authenticity of an article, the article including a tag having a tag data store, and wherein the apparatus includes a tag reader for:

a) determining article information from the tag data store; and

,

b) allowing a comparison of the article information to predetermined information, to thereby authenticate the article dependent on the result of the comparison, the predetermined information being obtained from at least one of.

i) the tag store;

ii) a database;

iii) a second tag provided on the article; and

,

iv) the article.

17. Apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the tag reader includes at least one of:

a) a display for displaying the article information to allow visual comparison with the predetermined information; and

,

b) a processor for comparing the article information to the predetermined information.

18. Apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the tag reader includes a communications system for communicating with a remote database to thereby determine the predetermined information.

19. A method for use in determining the authenticity of an article, the article including a tag having a tag data store, and wherein the method includes:

a) in a tag reader, storing article information in the tag data store; and

,

b) providing predetermined information, the predetermined in formation being used to authenticate the article by comparing the predetermined information to the article information, the predetermined information being provided to at least one of;

i) in the tag store;

ii) in a second tag provided on the article; and

,

iii) on the article.

20. (canceled)

21. Apparatus for use in determining the authenticity of an article, the article including a tag having a tag data store, and wherein the apparatus includes a tag reader for storing article information in the tag data store, the article information being related to predetermined information to allow authentication of the article by comparing the predetermined information to the article information, the predetermined information being provided at least one of.

a) in the tag store;

b) in a second tag provided on the article; and

,

c) on the article.

22. A method associated with insuring an article, the method including:

a) providing an article authentication mechanism by;

i) storing article information in a tag having a tag data store, the tag being attached to the article;

ii) providing predetermined information for use in authenticating the article, the predetermined information being provided at least one of.

(1) in the tag store,

(2) in a database;

(3) in a second tag provided on the article; and

,

(4) in the article; and

,

b) insuring the article, the insurance premium being at a reduced level compared to the premium payable if the article did not include the authentication mechanism.

23. (canceled)

24. A method associated with an insured article, the method including:

a) in a tag reader, determining article information from a tag having a tag data store, the tag being attached to the article;

b) comparing the article information to predetermined information, the predetermined information being obtained from at least one of;

i) the tag store;

ii) a second tag provided on the article; and

,

iii) the article; and

,

c) authenticating the article dependent on the result of the comparison.

25. A method according to claim 24, wherein the method includes:

a) in the tag reader, transferring the article information to an insuring entity; and

,

b) having the insuring entity authenticate the article.

26. (canceled)