Apparatus and Method of Generating Self-Debugging Computer Software

• US 20090217235A1
• Filed: 02/27/2008
• Published: 08/27/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 02/27/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: SAP SE
• Original Assignee: SAP AG (SAP SE)
• Inventors: Suenbuel, Asuman
• Granted Patent: US 8,166,459 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/104
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/366 using diagnostics G06F11/0703 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/552 involving long-term monitoring or reporting
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/577 Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security

Abstract

In one embodiment the present invention includes a computer-implemented method of self debugging a computer program operating in a distributed processing environment. The method includes detecting a fault in a plurality of processing devices and classifying the fault according to fault classifications. The fault classifications have corresponding responses. The method further includes executing one of the responses in accordance with the fault having been classified. The method further includes revising the computer program according to the response. This method may be embodied in a computer program or executed by a computer system. In this manner, the computer program performs self debugging.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of self-debugging a computer program operating in a distributed processing environment, comprising:

detecting a fault in a plurality of processing devices operating in the distributed processing environment;

classifying the fault into at least one of a plurality of fault classifications, wherein the plurality of fault classifications have a plurality of responses that correspond thereto;

executing one of the plurality of responses in accordance with the fault having been classified; and

revising the computer program according to the response.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing a model specification that corresponds to the computer program; and

generating the computer program from the model specification.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing a model specification that corresponds to the computer program, wherein the step of revising the computer program includes;

revising the model specification according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the model specification having been revised.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing an environmental model that corresponds to the distributed processing environment, wherein the step of revising the computer program includes;

revising the environmental model according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the environmental model having been revised.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the distributed processing environment comprises a plurality of distributed processors, and wherein the computer program comprises:

a plurality of subprograms executed by the plurality of distributed processors; and

a debugging program that executes the steps of detecting, classifying, executing and revising.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the distributed processing environment comprises a plurality of distributed processors, and wherein the computer program comprises:

a plurality of subprograms executed by the plurality of distributed processors; and

a debugging program that executes the steps of detecting, classifying, executing and revising,

wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and

wherein the step of revising the computer program includes not using data from at least one of the plurality of subprograms that is related to the fault.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the distributed processing environment comprises a plurality of distributed processors, and wherein the computer program comprises:

a plurality of subprograms executed by the plurality of distributed processors; and

a debugging program that executes the steps of detecting, classifying, executing and revising,

wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and

wherein the step of revising the computer program includes rolling back processing by at least one of the plurality of subprograms.

8. A computer program, tangibly embodied in a computer-readable medium, for implementing self-debugging processing in a distributed processing environment, the computer program comprising:

a plurality of subprograms executed by a plurality of processing devices operating in the distributed processing environment; and

a debugging program that executes processing comprising;

detecting a fault in the plurality of processing devices operating in the distributed processing environment;

classifying the fault into at least one of a plurality of fault classifications, wherein the plurality of fault classifications have a plurality of responses that correspond thereto;

executing one of the plurality of responses in accordance with the fault having been classified; and

revising the computer program according to the response.

9. The computer program of claim 8, further comprising:

an environment module that stores an environmental model that corresponds to the distributed processing environment, wherein revising the computer program includes;

revising the environmental model according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the environmental model having been revised.

10. The computer program of claim 8, further comprising:

a system specification module that stores a model specification that corresponds to the computer program, wherein revising the computer program includes;

revising the model specification according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the model specification having been revised.

11. The computer program of claim 8, wherein a model specification corresponds to the computer program, further comprising:

a refinement and code generation module that generates the computer program from the model specification.

12. The computer program of claim 8, wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and wherein revising the computer program includes not using data from at least one of the plurality of subprograms that is related to the fault.

13. The computer program of claim 8, wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and wherein revising the computer program includes rolling back processing by at least one of the plurality of subprograms.

14. A computer system for performing self-debugging processing in a distributed processing environment, comprising:

a plurality of processing devices operating in the distributed processing environment; and

a computer program executed by the plurality of distributed processors, the computer program including;

a plurality of subprograms executed by the plurality of distributed processors; and

a debugging program that executes processing comprising;

detecting a fault in the plurality of processing devices operating in the distributed processing environment;

classifying the fault into at least one of a plurality of fault classifications, wherein the plurality of fault classifications have a plurality of responses that correspond thereto;

executing one of the plurality of responses in accordance with the fault having been classified; and

revising the computer program according to the response.

15. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the plurality of processing devices comprises:

a plurality of sensor nodes that execute the plurality of subprograms; and

a control node that executes the debugging program.

16. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the plurality of processing devices comprises:

a plurality of servers that execute the plurality of subprograms, wherein one of the plurality of servers executes the debugging program.

17. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the computer program further comprises:

an environment module that stores an environmental model that corresponds to the distributed processing environment, wherein revising the computer program includes;

revising the environmental model according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the environmental model having been revised.

18. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the computer program further comprises:

a system specification module that stores a model specification that corresponds to the computer program, wherein revising the computer program includes;

revising the model specification according to the response; and

generating the computer program from the model specification having been revised.

19. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and wherein revising the computer program includes not using data from at least one of the plurality of subprograms that is related to the fault.

20. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the fault comprises a data discrepancy between at least two of the plurality of subprograms, and wherein revising the computer program includes rolling back processing by at least one of the plurality of subprograms.