Balanced Scorecard Method for Determining an Impact on a Business Service Caused by Degraded Operation of an IT System Component

• US 20090240510A1
• Filed: 03/18/2008
• Published: 09/24/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/18/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Planet DDS Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Planet DDS Incorporated
• Inventors: Johnson, Andrew D., Glading, Grant, Bosomworth, Paul, Hopkins, Lloyd B., Griffiths, Colin, Miles, Jonathan D.
• Application Number:
  US12/050,339
• Publication Number:
  US 20090240510A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1.100
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

A “balanced scorecard” method is disclosed for determining degrees of impact on business service elements (BSE'"'"'s) caused by degradations of configuration items (CI'"'"'s) in an underlying IT system. The formulas are used by an Impact Calculation Engine (ICE) of a Business Services Management (BSM) system. They provide enhanced accuracy by accounting for “service aspects” of alerts (using categories such as performance, availability, security, end user, capacity, and financial) and/or degrees of CI degradation (in some embodiments using OSI Standards). The method eliminates manual assignment of degrees of impact. Preferred embodiments convert alerts to a common alert format, determine a separate degree of impact for each service aspect, and use default formulas when custom formulas are not provided. Some embodiments use a service subscription wizard to at least partly automate the assignment of CI-to-BSE relationships. Different balanced scorecards can apply to the same BSE at different times, dates, usage levels, etc.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing alerts regarding degraded operation of Configuration Items (“

CI'"'"'s”

) so as to determine impacts on business service elements (“

BSE'"'"'s”

) that compose a business service, the CI'"'"'s being part of an IT system that supports the business service and each CI being related to at least one BSE, the method comprising;

receiving the alerts;

extracting from the alerts identities of the CI'"'"'s;

determining the BSE'"'"'s to which the CI'"'"'s are related;

extracting from each alert at least one of the nature of the degraded operation (herein referred to as the “

service aspect”

) and the severity of the degraded operation; and

determining the impacts on the BSE'"'"'s caused by the degraded operation of the CI'"'"'s according to “

balanced scorecard”

formulas that take into account the at least one of the service aspects and the severities of the alerts.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising converting alerts after they are received into a common alert format that allows information to be extracted from all received alerts in a consistent manner.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determination of the BSE'"'"'s to which the CI'"'"'s are related is accomplished at least partly by obtaining information from a Configuration Management Database (“

CMDB”

) in which at least some relationships between CI'"'"'s and BSE'"'"'s are stored.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising a reconciliation engine that at least facilitates the association of information identifying a CI in an alert with information identifying the CI in the CMDB.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein each service aspect extracted from an alert is characterized by assigning the service aspect to a service aspect category.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the service aspect categories include at least one of performance, availability, security, end user, capacity, and financial.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein severities of degraded CI operation extracted from alerts are assigned values according to the Open Systems Interconnect (“

OSI”

) standard.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein a default balanced scorecard is used to determine the impacts on BSE'"'"'s of degraded operation of CI'"'"'s except when a custom balanced scorecard is applicable.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein a balanced scorecard can be applicable only to a subset of the BSE'"'"'s that includes at least one BSE.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein a balanced scorecard can be applicable only to a subset of service aspects that includes at least one service aspect.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of balanced scorecards can be associated with the same BSE and service aspect, such that exactly one of the plurality of balanced scorecards is applicable to the BSE and service aspect under any set of circumstances but different balanced scorecards from the plurality of balanced scorecards are applicable to the BSE and service aspect under different sets of circumstances.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the balanced scorecard that is applicable to the BSE and the service aspect is selected from the plurality of balanced scorecards associated with the BSE and the service aspect by at least one of real time manual selection, and automatic selection according to at least one of:

a time of day;

a date;

a day of the week;

a usage level of the BSE;

a usage level of the business service;

a usage level of a;

a network traffic level; and

other service level agreement criteria, herein referred to as SLAC'"'"'s.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein a SLAC can be used in relation to more than one BSE as a criterion for selecting an applicable balanced scorecard.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein at least some of the balanced scorecard formulas provide a separate degree of impact for each service aspect extracted from an alert.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising a service subscription wizard that at least partially automates the assignment of relationships of CI'"'"'s to BSE'"'"'s.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the service subscription wizard automatically assigns relationships of CI'"'"'s to BSE'"'"'s during an initial implementation of the method.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the service subscription wizard automatically creates and modifies assigned relationships of CI'"'"'s to BSE'"'"'s when changes to the configuration of CI'"'"'s within the IT system take place.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the service subscription wizard automatically obtains information from data sources available within the IT system regarding at least one of enumeration of CI'"'"'s in the IT system and configuration of CI'"'"'s in the IT system.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the service subscription wizard maintains a database of information regarding relationships of CI'"'"'s to BSE'"'"'s in a Configuration Management Database