Detection of Porphyry Copper Deposit Using Natural Electromagnetic Fields

• US 20090251146A1
• Filed: 04/04/2008
• Published: 10/08/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/04/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Geotech Airborne
• Original Assignee: Geotech Airborne
• Inventors: Lo, Bob Bak, Morrison, Edward B.
• Application Number:
  US12/062,795
• Publication Number:
  US 20090251146A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/330
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 3/165 operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by the object or by the detecting device with electromagnetic waves G01V3/17

Abstract

A method for identifying a possible porphyry copper deposit which includes flying an airborne sensor over a survey area measuring natural electromagnetic fields in the survey area, and then determining, in dependence on the measured natural electromagnetic fields, if one or more sub-areas in the survey area have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to a predetermined resistivity signature for a porphyry copper deposit. The predetermined resistivity signature includes a higher resistivity inner region at least partially surrounded by a lower resistivity outer region

Claims

1. A method for identifying a possible porphyry copper deposit, comprising:

flying an airborne sensor over a survey area measuring natural electromagnetic fields in the survey area; and

determining, in dependence on the measured natural electromagnetic fields, if one or more sub-areas in the survey area have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to a predetermined resistivity signature for a porphyry copper deposit, the predetermined resistivity signature including a higher resistivity inner region at least partially surrounded by a lower resistivity outer region.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher resistivity inner region has a resistivity that is substantially between one to two orders of magnitude higher than the resistivity of the lower resistivity outer region.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the inner region has an area of between 2 km² to 8 km².

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the inner region and outer region together have an area of between 10 km² to 30 km².

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the outer region substantially surrounds the inner region.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein determining, in dependence on the measured natural electromagnetic fields, if one or more sub-areas in the survey area have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to a predetermined resistivity signature includes calculating tilt angle information for the natural electromagnetic fields in the survey area in dependence on the measured natural electromagnetic fields, the tilt angle information being representative of resistivity characteristics of the survey area.

7. The method of claim 6 comprising measuring attitude changes of the airborne sensor as it flies over the survey area, wherein calculating the tilt angle information is done in dependence on the measured attitude changes to mitigate against noise caused by movement of the airborne sensor.

8. The method of claim 1 comprising conducting a physical on-ground survey of any sub-area in the survey area that has been determined to have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to the predetermined resistivity signature for a porphyry copper deposit.

9. A method for identifying a possible porphyry copper deposit, comprising:

conducting an airborne audio frequency magnetic (“

AFMAG”

) geophysical survey of a survey area measuring low frequency natural electromagnetic fields in the survey area;

calculating a plurality of tilt angles of the electromagnetic waves of the low frequency natural electromagnetic fields; and

determining in dependence on the calculated tilt angles if one or more sub-areas in the survey area have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to a predetermined resistivity signature for a porphyry copper deposit, the predetermined resistivity signature including a higher resistivity inner region at least partially surrounded by a lower resistivity outer region.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the higher resistivity inner region has a resistivity that is substantially between one to two orders of magnitude higher than the resistivity of the lower resistivity outer region.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the inner region has an area of between 2 km² to 8 km².

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the inner region and outer region together have an area of between 10 km² to 30 km².

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the outer region substantially surrounds the inner region.

14. The method of claim 9 wherein determining if one or more sub-areas in the survey area have a resistivity pattern that corresponds to a predetermined resistivity signature for a porphyry copper deposit comprises comparing the calculated tilt angles from different regions of the survey area to identify the one or more sub-areas.