METHOD FOR TESTING EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING

• US 20090253108A1
• Filed: 04/04/2008
• Published: 10/08/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/04/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Peter Daly
• Original Assignee: Peter Daly
• Inventors: Daly, Peter
• Application Number:
  US12/098,032
• Publication Number:
  US 20090253108A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/08 characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying further information

Abstract

A method testing executive functioning of a subject includes determining the subject'"'"'s performance ceiling for performing at least one task and then measuring the subject'"'"'s efficiency at performing the task at a difficulty level just below the performance ceiling, first without additional distractions and then with additional distractions. The subject'"'"'s executive functioning is then determined by comparing the subject'"'"'s efficiency without additional distractions to the subject'"'"'s efficiency with additional distractions. In one embodiment, the method can be implemented in a game-like format.

Claims

1. A method for testing executive functioning of a subject, the method comprising:

determining the subject'"'"'s performance ceiling for performing at least one task;

measuring the subject'"'"'s efficiency at performing the task at a difficulty level just below the performance ceiling and without additional distractions;

measuring the subject'"'"'s efficiency at performing the task at a difficulty level just below the performance ceiling and with additional distractions; and

determining the subject'"'"'s executive functioning by comparing the subject'"'"'s efficiency without additional distractions to the subject'"'"'s efficiency with additional distractions.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the subject'"'"'s performance ceiling for performing at least one task comprises having the subject repeatedly complete the task at increasing difficulty levels until the subject cannot complete the task.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one task comprises a series of tasks that place demands on verbal working memory, nonverbal working memory, and/or and interference control.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the subject'"'"'s executive functioning includes subtracting the subject'"'"'s efficiency with additional distractions from the subject'"'"'s efficiency without additional distractions to determine a decrease in efficiency due to the distractions.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein a decrease in efficiency that is greater than a predetermined threshold value is indicative of a deficiency in the subject'"'"'s executive functioning.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the additional distractions are visual and/or auditory in nature.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the additional distractions include spoken words.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the method is implemented as a game in which the subject is asked to complete a mission.

9. A computer-readable medium containing instructions for controlling a computer system to perform a method for testing executive functioning of a subject wherein the method comprises:

presenting a series of tasks;

receiving input regarding the tasks from the subject;

determining the subject'"'"'s performance ceiling for each one of the tasks in response to the input;

re-presenting the tasks at a difficulty level that is just below the performance ceiling for each task and without additional distractions;

measuring the subject'"'"'s efficiency at performing the tasks without additional distractions;

re-presenting the tasks at a difficulty level that is just below the performance ceiling for each task and with additional distractions;

measuring the subject'"'"'s efficiency at performing the tasks with additional distractions; and

determining the subject'"'"'s executive functioning by comparing the subject'"'"'s efficiency without additional distractions to the subject'"'"'s efficiency with additional distractions.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein determining the subject'"'"'s performance ceiling for each one of the tasks comprises repeatedly presenting the tasks at increasing difficulty levels and receiving input regarding the tasks from the subject until the subject cannot complete the task.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein presenting a task includes displaying a scene.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 11 wherein the additional distractions are visual images that appear on the periphery of the scene.

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein determining the subject'"'"'s executive functioning includes subtracting the subject'"'"'s efficiency with additional distractions from the subject'"'"'s efficiency without additional distractions to determine a decrease in efficiency due to the distractions.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein a decrease in efficiency that is greater than a predetermined threshold value is indicative of a deficiency in the subject'"'"'s executive functioning.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the additional distractions are visual and/or auditory in nature.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15 wherein the additional distractions include spoken words.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the method is implemented as a game in which the subject is asked to complete a mission.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 wherein the instructions cause the computer system to display an introductory narrative that describes the game.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 wherein the instructions cause the computer system to display a warning narrative prior to the tasks being re-presented at a difficulty level that is just below the performance ceiling for each task and with additional distractions, wherein the warning narrative informs the subject that there will be increased distractions ahead.