COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING OPERATING COSTS OF BATTERY-OPERATED SHEET DISPENSERS

• US 20090254357A1
• Filed: 04/07/2008
• Published: 10/08/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/07/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: SCA Tissue North America LLC (Svenska Cellulosa AB)
• Original Assignee: SCA Tissue North America LLC (Svenska Cellulosa AB)
• Inventors: GISSKE, EDWARD T.
• Application Number:
  US12/098,471
• Publication Number:
  US 20090254357A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1.100
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Expected battery consumption by non-hard wired paper towel dispensers is calculated and compared as a way to help sell dispensers. The information is provided on a real-time basis not only for each type of dispenser a salesperson is attempting to sell, but also for competitive dispensers so that the customer can make an informed decision as to which dispenser(s) best meets his needs.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method of comparing a first product offered for sale by a first source to a second product offered for sale by a second source, the first and second sources being in commercial competition with one another, comprising:

inputting into a digital computer data representing expected usage of said first product by a prospective customer;

inputting into the digital computer data representing expected usage of said second product by a prospective customer;

processing said data pertaining to the first and second products to calculate at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate each of the first and second products; and

generating a visible display that compares at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate the first product with at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate the second product, so as to permit the prospective customer to determine which of the first and second products meets the prospective customer'"'"'s requirements.

2. The computer implemented method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

changing the data representing expected usage of said first product as changed data input;

processing said changed data input to calculate at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate the first product in accordance with the changed data input; and

comparing at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate the first product in accordance with the changed data input with at least one of a service life, an amount and a cost of material needed to operate the first product in accordance with the initial data input.

3. The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second products are absorbent sheet dispensers, and wherein the data representing expected usage of said first product by a prospective customer is at least one of roll length, sheet length, battery capacity, sleep time, awake time and dispense time, and the calculated data output includes battery life for batteries used in the sheet dispenser.

4. A computer-implemented method of comparing a first battery-operated sheet dispenser to a second battery-operated sheet dispenser, comprising the steps of:

inputting into a digital computer plural process parameters for the first battery-operated sheet dispenser;

processing said plural process parameters for the first battery-operated sheet dispenser to determine a first output;

inputting into said digital computer plural processor parameters for the second battery-operated sheet dispenser;

processing said plural process parameters for the second battery-operated sheet dispenser to determine a second output; and

displaying the first output and the second output to provide a user with a comparison so that the user can determine whether the first battery-operated sheet dispenser or the second battery-operated sheet dispenser meets the user'"'"'s requirements.

5. The computer-implemented method according to claim 4, wherein said inputting plural process parameters for the first battery-operated sheet dispenser comprises inputting at least one of roll length, sheet length, rolls used per years, battery capacity, sleep current, sleep time, awake time.

6. A computer-implemented method of determining which of plural battery-operated sheet dispensers best suit a customer'"'"'s requirements, comprising the steps of:

inputting plural process parameters for a first one of said plural battery-operated sheet dispensers;

processing said plural process parameters for the first battery-operated sheet dispenser to determine plural first outputs;

inputting plural processor parameters for a second one of said plural battery-operated sheet dispensers;

processing said plural process parameters for the second battery-operated sheet dispenser to determine plural second outputs; and

comparing the first outputs with the second outputs to provide a customer with a real-time comparison of the plural battery-operated sheet dispensers so that the customer can immediately determine which of the plural battery-operated sheet dispensers best meets the customer'"'"'s requirements.

7. The computer implemented method according to claim 6, wherein said steps of inputting plural process parameters comprises inputting at least one of the following dispenser parameters:

a length of a roll of sheets to be dispensed, a length of a sheet to be dispensed, a number of rolls used per year, battery capacity, sleep current, sleep time, awake current, awake time, average dispense current, and dispense time.

8. The computer implemented method according to claim 6, wherein said steps of processing said plural parameters comprise determining an intermediate result of at least one of the following output parameters of a dispenser:

a number of sheets per roll, a number of sheets used per month, number of sheets used per day, a number of sheets used per year, energy to dispense one sheet, energy used per month in a standby mode, energy used per month in a dispensing mode, percent of energy used to move sheets, percent of energy used waiting, and average standby current.

9. The computer implemented method according to claim 8, wherein said steps of processing said plural parameters further comprise determining a final result of battery life.

10. A computer implemented method of determining a customer'"'"'s absorbent sheet dispenser requirements based on a desired maximum frequency of battery replacement, comprising:

inputting into a preprogrammed digital computer data including at least one of

     1) a length of a roll of paper towel received by the dispenser;

     2) a length of a sheet that is dispensed by the dispenser;

     3) a number of rolls used per year;

     4) battery capacity of batteries to be used by the dispenser;

     5) sleep current;

     6) sleep time;

     7) awake current;

     8) awake time;

     9) average dispense current;

     10) amp hour ratings of the batteries; and

     11) dispense time;

processing said data to determine a projected battery life of at least one said absorbent sheet dispenser.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10, further comprising processing said data to determine how many dispensers are needed in order not to exceed said predetermined maximum frequency of battery replacement.