Quality-Based Media Management for Network-Based Media Distribution

• US 20090259502A1
• Filed: 04/10/2008
• Published: 10/15/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Apple Inc.
• Original Assignee: Apple Inc.
• Inventors: Gray, Eric John, Erlewine, Daniel David, Wormington, Kate, Muller, Max, Cortes, Ricardo, Leffert, Jonathan B.
• Application Number:
  US12/101,014
• Publication Number:
  US 20090259502A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/108 Remote banking, e.g. home banking
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0603 Catalogue ordering
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting

Abstract

Disclosed are techniques and configurations for monitoring quality of digital media assets available from a network-based media distribution system, and taking action to make those digital media assets that have quality deficiencies unavailable from the network-based media distribution system. The network-based media distribution system can provide an online media store from which users can acquire those of the digital media assets that are deemed available. In one embodiment, digital media assets that have quality deficiencies can be rapidly discovered and automatically removed from being available at an online media store.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for managing media content availability at an online media repository, said method comprising:

tracking quality issues for a plurality of media items available for acquisition from the online media repository;

determining whether a particular media item has a likely quality problem based on the quality issues being tracked for the particular media item; and

automatically removing the particular media item from being available from the online media repository if said determining determines that the particular media item has a likely quality problem.

2. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

determining a content provider associated with the particular media item; and

electronically notifying the content provider that the particular media item has a likely quality problem.

3. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 2, wherein said method further comprises:

subsequently receiving a resubmitted version of the particular media item; and

rendering the resubmitted version of the particular media item available at the online media repository.

4. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 3, wherein said method further comprises:

avoiding subsequent removal of the resubmitted version of the particular media item from the online media repository due to quality issues associated with the removed version of the particular media item.

5. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

subsequently receiving a resubmitted version of the particular media item;

validating the resubmitted version of the particular media item; and

rendering the resubmitted version of the particular media item available at the online media repository if the resubmitted version of the particular media item has been successfully validated.

6. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said tracking of the quality issues for the plurality of media items available for acquisition from the online media repository comprises tracking refund activity for the plurality of media items.

7. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

determining prior recipients of the particular media item determined to have a likely quality problem; and

facilitating electronic delivery of the resubmitted version of the particular media item to the prior recipients.

8. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

determining prior recipients of the particular media item determined to have a likely quality problem; and

electronically notifying the prior recipients of availability of the resubmitted version of the particular media item.

9. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the online media repository is an online media store.

10. A computer-implemented method for managing media content availability at an online media repository, said method comprising:

obtaining a number of quality-based refunds associated with a particular media item that is available for acquisition from the online media repository;

obtaining a quality threshold associated with the particular media item;

determining whether the number of quality-based refunds associated with the particular media item is greater than the quality threshold associated with the particular media item; and

removing the particular media item from the online media repository if said determining determines that the number of quality-based refunds is greater than the quality threshold.

11. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein said method further comprises:

determining a content provider associated with the particular media item; and

electronically notifying the content provider that the particular media item has been removed from the online media repository.

12. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 11, wherein said method further comprises:

subsequently receiving a resubmitted version of the particular media item;

validating the resubmitted version of the particular media item; and

rendering the resubmitted version of the particular media item available at the online media repository if the resubmitted version of the particular media item has been successfully validated.

13. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 12, wherein said method further comprises:

electronically notifying the content provider that the resubmitted version of the particular media item has been rejected if the resubmitted version of the particular media item has not been successfully validated.

14. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 12, wherein said method further comprises:

avoiding subsequent removal of the resubmitted version of the particular media item from the online media repository due to quality-based refunds associated with the removed version of the particular media item.

15. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 12, wherein said method further comprises:

determining prior recipients of the particular media item that has been removed from the online media repository; and

electronically notifying the prior recipients of availability of the resubmitted version of the particular media item.

16. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein said method further comprises:

determining a media type for the particular media item; and

determining whether removal of the particular media item by said removing is prevented based on the media type.

17. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein said obtaining comprises:

determining a media type for the particular media item; and

obtaining of the quality threshold associated with the particular media item based on the media type.

18. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein the online media repository is an online media store.

19. A computer readable storage medium including at least executable computer program code for managing media content availability at an online media repository, said computer readable storage medium comprising:

computer program code for determining whether at least one digital media asset has a quality concern, the at least one digital media asset being at least one of a plurality of digital media assets available for acquisition from the online media repository; and

computer program code for automatically removing the at least one digital media asset from being available from the online media repository if it is determined that the particular digital media asset has a quality concern.

20. A computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19, wherein said computer readable storage medium further comprises:

computer program code for determining a content provider associated with the at least one digital media asset; and

computer program code for electronically notifying the content provider that the at least one digital media asset has a quality concern.

21. A computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 20, wherein said computer readable storage medium further comprises:

computer program code for subsequently receiving a resubmitted version of the at least one digital media asset; and

computer program code for rendering the resubmitted version of the at least one digital media asset available at the online media repository.

22. A computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 21, wherein said computer readable storage medium further comprises:

computer program code for determining prior recipients of the at least one digital media asset determined to have a quality concern; and

computer program code for facilitating electronic delivery of the resubmitted version of the at least one digital media asset to the prior recipients.

23. A media management system for an online media store, said media management system comprises:

a media database interface configured to interact with a media database that stores media content for a plurality of digital media assets available for distribution from the online media store;

a media store interface configured to interact with the online media store;

a media management module operatively connected to said media database and said media store database, said media management module being configured to manage the digital media assets available for distribution from the online media store;

a quality monitoring module operatively connected to said media management module, said quality monitoring module being configured to monitor quality of the plurality of digital media assets;

a media unavailability module operatively connected to said media management module, said media unavailability module being configured to facilitate rending of one or more of the digital media assets stored in the media database unavailable for distribution from the online media store based on the quality of the respective digital media assets being monitored; and

a media submission module operatively connected to said media management module, said media submission module being configured to facilitate submission of media content for the digital media assets to the media database and to facilitate resubmission of media content for the one or more of the digital media assets that are unavailable for distribution.