SENSOR CRITICALITY DETERMINATION PROCESS

• US 20090266150A1
• Filed: 04/23/2008
• Published: 10/29/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/23/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: United Technologies Corporation (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Original Assignee: United Technologies Corporation (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Inventors: Novis, Ari
• Application Number:
  US12/107,790
• Publication Number:
  US 20090266150A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 73/112.10
• CPC Class Codes: B64D 2045/0085 Devices for aircraft health monitoring, e.g. monitoring flutter or vibration
• CPC Class Codes: F01D 21/003 Arrangements for testing or measuring for measuring vibrations G01H
• CPC Class Codes: F05D 2260/80 Diagnostics

Abstract

A method and system of evaluating the criticality of parameters by evaluating consequences of a loss of capability to determine a desired operating parameter, identification of alternate means of obtaining the parameter, and assigning an importance value to the capability of determining the operating parameter. The resulting evaluation and identification is utilized to direct design and mitigation efforts.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating a criticality of a system parameter comprising:

evaluating potential consequences resulting from an absence of a system value;

identifying alternate means of obtaining information determined utilizing the system parameter;

assigning an importance to the system parameter; and

adjusting at least one means of obtaining the system parameter responsive to the evaluation of possible consequences and alternate means of obtaining information.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, where the evaluation of potential consequences resulting from the absence of the system parameter includes determining an effect that the absence of the system parameter will have on performance of a propulsion device.

3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the effects on the performance of the propulsion device includes a determination that the loss of the system parameter will result in at least one of a total failure, partial failure and an ability to detect a total or partial failure.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, further including performing actions that reduce a likelihood of a loss of the system parameter resulting in at least one of the total failure, partial failure and the ability to detect the total or the partial failure.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein identifying alternate means of obtaining the information includes one of identifying alternate system parameters that provide data that directly duplicates the system parameter and identifying different system parameters that can be utilized to derive the desired information.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, including identifying if a desired operation can be completed without the system parameter.

7. A method of evaluating the criticality of parameters for a propulsion system, the method comprising:

evaluating consequences of a loss of a capability to determine a desired propulsion system operating parameter;

identifying alternate means of obtaining a value indicative of the desired propulsion system operating parameter; and

assigning an importance to the capability of determining the desired propulsion system operating parameter in view of the evaluated consequences and the identified alternate means of obtaining a value indicative of the desired propulsion system operating parameter.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 including adjusting a process of obtaining the operating parameter responsive to the assigned importance and the evaluated consequences.

9. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein evaluating consequences includes the determination that the loss of a capability to determine a desired propulsion system operating parameter would result in total loss of propulsion system performance and therefore is safety critical.

10. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein evaluating consequences includes the determination that the loss of a capability to determine a desired propulsion system operating parameter would result in loss of a mission critical capability and therefore is mission critical.

11. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein evaluating consequences includes the determination that the loss of a capability to determine a desired propulsion system operating parameter would result in a loss of a capability to detect a failure in at least one of a safety critical and a mission critical parameter.

12. The method as recited in claim 11, including determining that a parameter is durability critical responsive to identification of alternate means of obtaining the desired propulsion system parameter.

13. The method as recited in claim 12, including determining that a parameter is mission essential responsive to a determination that no alternate means of obtaining the desired propulsion system parameter are available.

14. The method as recited in claim 12, including assigning the parameter as mission essential critical responsive to determining that a mission cannot be completed without the capability of monitoring the propulsion system operating parameter.

15. A system for evaluating a criticality of a system parameter comprising:

a controller operable for categorizing a system parameter based on potential consequences caused by a loss of the system parameter, assigning an importance to the system parameter based on the potential consequences, and ranking each system parameter based on the importance to the system.

16. The system as recited in claim 15, wherein the controller is operable to identify alternate means of obtaining information provided by the system parameter and utilizing the identified alternate means to determine the rank of the system parameter.

17. The system as recited in claim 16, where the controller is operable for evaluating potential consequences resulting from the absence of the measured value includes determining an effect that the absence of the measured value will have on performance of a propulsion device.

18. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the effects on the performance of the propulsion device includes a determination that the loss of the measured value will result in at least one of a total failure, partial failure and an ability to detect a total or partial failure.