APPLIANCE CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD

• US 20090299504A1
• Filed: 05/28/2009
• Published: 12/03/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 05/28/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Toshiba Lifestyle Products & Services Corporation (Midea Group Co., Ltd)
• Original Assignee: Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba (Toshiba Corporation)
• Inventors: Kimura, Koji, Kumazawa, Toshimitsu
• Granted Patent: US 8,078,318 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/83
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/4183 characterised by data acquisition, e.g. workpiece identification
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/31292 Data in categories, each with a priority factor
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/31318 Data analysis, using different formats like table, chart
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/31463 Status of whole system calculated from status of its components

Abstract

An appliance control apparatus acquires, at intervals of predetermined time, a state data including values of operation states of respective appliances, stores the state data as one record in a memory, to store time-series records, classifies the records in the memory into a plurality of living situation groups by clustering the records, and calculates, for each living situation group, a barycenter of each operation state, determines, for a target state data, one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, determines one of the operation states whose value in the target state data is larger than corresponding barycenter in the one of the living situation groups, and determines the barycenter as a recommended value, and controls the one of operation state to the recommended value when obtaining an acceptance instruction for the recommended value.

Claims

1. An appliance control apparatus which controls a plurality of appliances in a living space of a user, the apparatus comprising:

an acquisition unit configured to acquire, at intervals of predetermined time, a state data including values of operation states of the respective appliances;

a state data memory to store the state data as one record, to store a plurality of time-series records;

a classifying unit configured to classify the records stored in the state data memory into a plurality of living situation groups by clustering the records based on the values of operation states in each record, and to calculate, for each living situation group, a barycenter of each operation state from records belonging to the living situation group;

a living situation determination unit configured to determine, for each target state data which is acquired by the acquisition unit, one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, the values of the operation states in each record belonging to the one of the living situation groups are closest to the values of the operation states in the target state data;

an operation determination unit configured to compare a value of each operation state in the target state data with the barycenter of each operation state in the one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, to determine one of the operation states whose value in the target state data is larger than corresponding barycenter in the one of the living situation groups, and to determine the barycenter of the one of the operation states in the one of the living situation groups as a first recommended value of the one of the operation states;

an interface unit configured to present the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, and to obtain an acceptance instruction or a rejection instruction concerning the first recommended value of the one of the operation states which is presented; and

an appliance control unit configured to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value when obtaining the acceptance instruction.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein

the operation determination unit is further configured to determine another of the operation states whose value in the target state data is smaller than corresponding barycenter in the one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, and to determine a smallest value of the another of the operation states among records belonging to the one of the living situation groups, as a second recommended value of the another of the operation states;

the interface unit is further configured to present the second recommended value of the another of the operation states, and to obtain an acceptance instruction or a rejection instruction concerning the second recommended value of the another of the operation states, and

the appliance control unit is further configured to control the another of the operation states to the second recommended value when obtaining the acceptance instruction concerning the second recommended value.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprises:

an interaction execution unit configured to count (a) a proposal count indicating the number of times the interface unit presents the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, (b) an acceptance count indicating the number of times the acceptance instruction is obtained for the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, and (c) a rejection count indicating the number of times the rejection instruction is obtained for the first recommended value of the one of the operation states; and

wherein

when the acceptance count is not less than a predetermined first threshold, the interaction execution unit is configured to cause the appliance control unit to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value without causing the interface unit to present the first recommended value, and

when the rejection count is not less than a predetermined second threshold, the interaction execution unit is configured to cause the interface unit not to present the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, and is configured to cause the appliance control unit not to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value.

4. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein further comprises

a history memory;

and wherein

the interaction execution unit is further configured (a) to store first flag information in the history memory when the acceptance count is not less than the first threshold, and (b) to store second flag information in the history memory when the rejection count is not less than the second threshold; and

wherein

when the first flag information is stored in the history memory, the interaction execution unit causes the appliance control unit to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value without causing the interface unit to present the first recommended value, and

when the second flag information is stored in the history memory, the interaction execution unit causes the interface unit not to present the first recommended value of the one of the operation states and causes the appliance control unit not to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value.

5. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein

the interaction execution unit is further configured to count, within a predetermined period of time after the one of the operation states changes to the first recommended value by control of the appliance control unit, a correcting manipulation count indicating the number of times a value of the one of the operation states acquired by the acquisition unit further changed, and

when the correcting manipulation count is larger than a predetermined third threshold,

the interaction execution unit is further configured to initialize the proposal count, the acceptance count, the rejection count, and the correcting manipulation count to “

0”

, and to store, in the history memory, a third flag information for causing the appliance control unit to control the one of the operation states to the first recommended value when obtaining the acceptance instruction after causing the interface unit to present the first recommended value of the one of the operation states.

6. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein

the history memory further stores a plurality of target state data each being acquired by the acquisition unit and being determined to belong to the one of the living situation groups, each target state data being stored with information indicating acceptance instruction is obtained or the rejection instruction is obtained when the interface unit presents the recommended value of the one of the operation states;

and further comprises;

a dividing unit configured to divide, when the proposal count is not less than a predetermined fourth threshold, and the acceptance count is smaller than the first threshold or the rejection count is smaller than the second threshold, the plurality of target state data belonging to the one of the living situation groups into a first group of target state data with the information indicating the acceptance instruction is obtained and a second group of target state data with the information indicating the rejection instruction is obtained, and to calculate, for each of the first group and the second group, a barycenter of each operation state.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the acquisition unit acquires values of various types of operation states of each appliance, which include values measured by the appliances, power supply state of the appliance, and set value of the appliance.

8. An appliance control method for an appliance control apparatus which includes

an acquisition unit configured to acquire, at intervals of predetermined time, a state data including values of operation states of the respective appliances in a living space of a user;

and

a state data memory to store the state data as one record, to store a plurality of time-series records;

the method including;

classifying the records stored in the state data memory into a plurality of living situation groups by clustering the records based on the values of operation states in each record;

calculating, for each living situation group, a barycenter of each operation state from records belonging to the living situation group;

obtaining the state data, as a target state data, by the acquisition unit,

determining, for the target state data, one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, the values of the operation states in each record belonging to the one of the living situation groups are closest to the values of the operation states in the target state data;

comparing a value of each operation state in the target state data with the barycenter of each operation state in the one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, to determine one of the operation states whose value in the target state data is larger than corresponding barycenter in the one of the living situation groups, and to determine the barycenter of the one of the operation states in the one of the living situation groups, as a first recommended value of the one of the operation states;

presenting the first recommended value of the one of the operation states; and

obtaining an acceptance instruction or a rejection instruction concerning the first recommended value of the one of the operation states which is presented;

controlling the one of the operation states to the first recommended value when the acceptance instruction is obtained.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein comparing includes determining another of the operation states whose value in the target state data is smaller than corresponding barycenter in the one of the living situation groups to which the target state data belongs, and determining a smallest value of the another of the operation states among records belonging to the one of the living situation groups, as a second recommended value of the another of the operation states;

presenting further presents the second recommended value of the another of the operation states;

obtaining further obtains an acceptance instruction or a rejection instruction concerning the second recommended value of the another of the operation states; and

controlling further controls the another of the operation states to the second recommended value when the acceptance instruction concerning the second recommended value.

10. The method according to claim 8, further includes:

counting (a) a proposal count indicating the number of times the first recommended value of the one of the operation states is represented, (b) an acceptance count indicating the number of times the acceptance instruction is obtained for the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, and (c) a rejection count indicating the number of times the rejection instruction is obtained for the first recommended value of the one of the operation states; and

wherein

when the acceptance count is not less than a predetermined first threshold, the one of the operation states is controlled to the recommended value without presenting the first recommended value of the one of the operation states, and

when the rejection count is not less than a predetermined second threshold, the first recommended value of the one of the operation states is not represented, and the one of the operation states is not controlled to the first recommended value.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the method further includes:

storing first flag information in a history memory when the acceptance count is not less than the first threshold;

storing second flag information in the history memory when the rejection count is not less than the second threshold; and

wherein

when the first flag information is stored in the history memory, the one of the operation states is controlled to the first recommended value without presenting the first recommended value, and

when the second flag information is stored in the history memory, the first recommended value of the one of the operation states is not presented and the one of the operation states is not controlled to the first recommended value.

12. The method according to claim 10, further includes:

counting, within a predetermined period of time after the one of the operation states changes to the first recommended value by the control, a correcting manipulation count indicating the number of times a value of the one of the operation state acquired by the acquisition unit further changed, and

when the correcting manipulation count is larger than a predetermined third threshold,

(a) initializing the proposal count, the acceptance count, the rejection count, and the correcting manipulation count to “

0”

,

(b) storing, in the history memory, a third flag information for controlling the one of the operation states to the first recommended value when obtaining the acceptance instruction after presenting the first recommended value.

13. The method according to claim 10, further includes:

storing, in the history memory, a plurality of target state data each being acquired by the acquisition unit and being determined to belong to the one of the living situation groups, each target state data being stored with information indicating acceptance instruction is obtained or the rejection instruction is obtained when the recommended value of the one of the operation states is represented; and

dividing, when the proposal count is not less than a predetermined fourth threshold, and the acceptance count is smaller than the first threshold or the rejection count is smaller than the second threshold, the plurality of target state data belonging to the one of the living situation groups into a first group of target state data with the information indicating the acceptance instruction is obtained and a second group of target state data with the information indicating the rejection instruction is obtained; and

calculating, for each of the first group and the second group, a barycenter of each operation state.