METHOD OF MODELLING THE EFFECT OF A FAULT ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF A SYSTEM

• US 20090299713A1
• Filed: 10/23/2006
• Published: 12/03/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 10/24/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ricardo UK Limited (Ricardo PLC)
• Original Assignee: Ricardo UK Limited (Ricardo PLC)
• Inventors: Sewell, Benjamin John, Dominguez-Garcia, Alejandro D., Miller, Peter John
• Application Number:
  US12/091,433
• Publication Number:
  US 20090299713A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/8
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 17/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0248 Causal models, e.g. fault tree; digraphs; qualitative physics
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0281 Quantitative, e.g. mathematical distance; Clustering; Neural networks; Statistical analysis

Abstract

A method of modelling the effect of a fault on the behaviour of a system. The method comprises modifying a functional model of a system to specify a fault in the system; running the model in accordance with a test, the test having an input and an expected output, the input defining the value of a least one input variable over a period of time and the expected output defining the expected value of at least one output variable over the period of time; the functional model calculating, in dependence on the value of the input variable defined by the input, a modelled output comprising the modelled value of the output variable over the period of time; and comparing the modelled output with the expected output to determine a severity score for the fault based on the difference between the modelled output and the expected output.

Claims

1. A method of modelling the effect of a fault on the behaviour of a system, comprising:

(a) providing variable in a functional model of a system, wherein setting a variable to true injects a specified fault and wherein setting the variable to false causes the model to operate as if the fault is not present;

(b) setting a variable to true to modify the functional model to specify a fault in the system;

(c) running the functional model in accordance with a test, the test having an input and an expected output, the input defining the value of at least one input variable over a period of time and the expected output defining the expected value of at least one output variable over the period of time;

(d) the functional model calculating, in dependence on the value of the input variable defined by the input, a modelled output comprising the modelled value of the at least one output variable over the period of time; and

(e) comparing the modelled output with the expected output to determine a severity score for the fault based on the difference between the modelled output and the expected output.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein step (b) comprises setting two or more variable to true to make two or more modifications to the functional model to specify two or more respective faults in the system.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein step (e) comprises comparing the modelled output with the expected output to determine a performance level for the fault and converting the performance level to the severity score for the fault.

4. A method according to claim 3 wherein there are a predefined set of performance levels and each performance level of the set has a corresponding predefined severity score.

5. A method according to claim 1 further comprising repeating steps (b) to (e) for different faults in the system.

6. A method according to claim 1, further comprising determining an occurrence score for the fault by converting failure data into the occurrence score.

7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising determining an occurrence score for a combination of two or more faults by using a Markov reliability analysis.

8. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

(f) generating a reliability report comprising the severity score for one or more faults.

9. A method according to claim 1, further comprising making a fault definition in the functional model, the fault definition being activatable to perform step (b).

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the fault definition is predefined in a functional model library.

11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the model is a vehicle model.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the model is an automobile model.

13. A method according to claim 1, further comprising changing the model and repeating the steps (a)-(e).

14. A method according to claim 1 wherein the model is a Simulink model.

15. A method according to claim 1 wherein the model is a Carsim model.

16. A computer program operable to cause a computer to perform the method of claim 1.

18. A computer configured to perform the method of claim 1.

19. An apparatus comprising a processor configured to perform the method of claim 1.

17. A carrier medium comprising the computer program of claim 17.