Behavioral Trust Rating Filtering System

• US 20090299819A1
• Filed: 03/03/2007
• Published: 12/03/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/04/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: John Stannard Iii Davis
• Original Assignee: John Stannard Iii Davis
• Inventors: Moe, Eric, Davis, John Stannard III
• Application Number:
  US12/281,735
• Publication Number:
  US 20090299819A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.38
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 90/00 Systems or methods specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial, managerial or supervisory purposes, not involving significant data processing

Abstract

An improved rating system allows users to give anonymous ratings of any item such as devices, compositions and services including personal services (i.e., individuals). The system is based on degrees of behavioral similarity between raters. The highest degree of behavioral similarity is established between raters who have rated the same item identically or similarly. The system allows a user to view ratings or anonymous raters who have a high degree of behavioral similarity to the user. The system allows users to control the various ‘degrees’ or levels of behavioral linkage to gather meaningful data in a way that greatly extends the potential usefulness and applicability of the rating filtering system while preserving the anonymity of raters and their individual ratings.

Claims

1. A method for implementing a rating system for use by a plurality of raters comprising the steps of:

accumulating the rating scores resulting from the plurality of raters rating a plurality of items;

establishing degrees of behavioral separation between each of the raters based on raters having given the same or similar rating score to the same item; and

producing a filtered rating score of a particular item wherein the degree of behavioral separation between the raters and a particular rater is used in conjunction with the rating scores for the particular item to obtain the filtered rating score relevant to the particular rater.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of producing a filtered rating further comprises filtering on the basis of how the raters rated an item other than the particular item.

3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising a step of protecting the anonymity of the raters.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the filtered rating score is based on weight selections made by a particular system user.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the filtered rating score is produced according to the weight selections and according to the degree of behavioral separation between the particular rater and the other raters providing the rating scores.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the filtered rating score is produced according to an effective weight for each rater where the effective weight is calculated by dividing 100% by the degree of behavioral separation.

7. The method according to claim 6 further comprising the step of calculating an effective rating for each item where the effective rating equals the sum of all the effective weights for each rater multiplied by the rating score of that rater divided by the sum or all the effective weights.

8. A method for implementing and using a rating system comprising the steps of:

accumulating the rating scores resulting from a plurality of raters rating a plurality of items;

allowing a first rater to rate at least two items from the plurality of items by providing rating scores for each item;

establishing degrees of behavioral separation between each of the raters and the first rater based on raters having given a same or similar rating score to the same items rated by the first rater;

producing filtered rating scores wherein the rating score of each item is filtered according to a behavioral trust separation filter based on the established degrees of behavioral separation, whereby the first rater selects one of the items based on the filtered scores.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of producing a filtered rating further comprises filtering on the basis of how the raters rated an item other than the particular item.

10. The method according to claim 8 further comprising a step of protecting the anonymity of the raters.

11. The method according to claim 8 further comprising the step of selecting weighting levels to be applied to the rating scores from each different degree of behavioral separation.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the first rater selects the weighting levels.

13. The method according to claim 8 further comprising the step of the first rater rating the selected item after evaluating it and using this rating as a measure of success of the system.

14. The method according to claim 8, wherein an effective trust level and a rating score is produced for each item and wherein the first rater selects the item having both the highest rating score and the highest effective trust level.

15. The method according to claim 14, wherein each rater has a trust level related to the degree of behavioral similarity with the first rater and wherein the effective trust level for a path is computed by multiplying the trust levels along the path.

16. A method for implementing a rating system for use by a plurality of raters comprising the steps of:

accumulating the rating scores resulting from the plurality of raters rating a plurality of items;

establishing degrees of behavioral separation between each of the raters based on raters having given a same or similar rating score to the same item;

producing a filtered rating score of a particular item wherein rating scores are weighted according to the selections and according to the degree of behavioral separation between the particular rater and the other raters providing the rating scores; and

protecting the anonymity of the raters.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the step of producing a filtered rating further comprises filtering on the basis of how the raters rated an item other than the particular item.

18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the filtered rating is based on weight selections made by a particular rater.

19. The method according to claim 16, wherein the filtered rating score is produced according to an effective weight for each rater where the effective weight is calculated by dividing 100% by the degree of behavioral separation.

20. The method according to claim 19 further comprising a step of calculating an effective rating for each item where the effective rating equals the sum of all the effective weights for each rater multiplied by the rating score of that rater divided by the sum or all the effective weights.