REAL-TIME VALIDATION OF INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS

• US 20090307666A1
• Filed: 06/04/2008
• Published: 12/10/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/04/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Clinick, Andrew, Kilian, Bryan
• Granted Patent: US 8,539,447 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/125
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3604 Software analysis for verifying properties of programs byte-code verification G06F9/44589

Abstract

A validation tool providing real-time validation of interactive content applications includes a static analysis engine that extrapolates the timeline of an application and the application'"'"'s behavior over that timeline. The static analysis engine watches various types of data associated with the application'"'"'s markup document and works through an editor to inform the user if the application has exceeded defined limits as the application is being built. The validation tool is further configured with a dynamic simulator that is arranged as a state machine that shares state information with the static analysis engine to enable the validation tool to display useful information such as pixel buffer usage at a given time code. The validation tool is further configured to provide a real-time application preview with which the user may interact to immediately evaluate cause and effect of any changes that are made in the application code using the editor.

Claims

1. A computer-readable medium containing instructions which, when executed by one or more processors disposed in an electronic device, implement a validation tool for performing validation of a software application providing interactive content as application code executes during an application build process, comprising:

a static analysis engine configured for extrapolating a timeline of the application and analyzing behavior of the application over the timeline, the analyzing including at least i) determining compliance with specifications that are applicable to the application, and ii) determining whether the application exceeds performance limitations of its execution environment;

a dynamic simulator configured for creating a time graph that indicates the behavior of the application over the timeline; and

a user interface configured for displaying the time graph.

2. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 in which the application comprises zero or more markup components and zero or more script components.

3. The computer-readable medium of claim 2 in which the application comprises an HDi application.

4. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 in which the execution environment is provided by a device selected from one of PC, set-top box, game console, mobile phone, PDA, personal media player, smart phone, GPS unit, handheld game device, or laptop computer.

5. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 in which the dynamic simulator includes a state machine using XPath expressions to determine entry and exit conditions of the state.

6. The computer-readable medium of claim 2 in which the user interface further is configured with an editor for displaying and editing code in the zero or more markup components.

7. The computer-readable medium of claim 2 in which the analyzing is performed by watching data, the data being selected from at least one of number of elements in the markup, number of attributes, values of attributes, length of attributes, inefficient XPath expression construction, number of cues to be evaluated at each clock tick, size of the markup, compliancy of included resources to applicable specification, or projected pixel buffer usage.

8. The computer-readable medium of claim 2 in which the static analysis engine is further configured for internally completing uncompleted markup by closing open tags.

9. The computer-readable medium of claim 1 in which the user interface is further arranged to display error conditions in the code responsively to the analyzing.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 in which the user interface displays the error conditions in real-time as a user makes edits to code in the application.

11. A method of operating a real-time validation tool embodied as software, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a user interface that is arranged for i) displaying an editing window that shows code of an application providing interactive content when executing, and ii) accepting edits to the code;

previewing the interactive content as the application executes in an execution environment; and

rendering the interactive content responsively to the edits to show cause and effect between the edits and the interactive content in real-time.

12. The method of claim 11 in which the interactive content complies with an HDi specification.

13. The method of claim 11 including a further step of accepting input from a user to manipulate or interact with the interactive content.

14. The method of claim 11 including a further step of indicating errors in the code through the editing window, the errors comprising non-compliance with applicable specifications or exceeding a performance threshold of one or more parameters existing in the execution environment.

15. The method of claim 11 including a further step of displaying resource utilization in the editing window.

16. The method of claim 15 in which the resource comprises a pixel buffer.

17. A method of operating a real-time validation tool embodied as software, the method comprising the steps of:

extrapolating a timeline of an application that provides interactive content when executing, the application comprising at least XML code, the timeline comprising an effect of the code on a system parameter over the application'"'"'s lifetime;

providing a user interface that is arranged for i) displaying the timeline and ii) displaying an editing window that displays the XML code, and iii) accepting edits to the code; and

receiving edits from the user through the user interface to set one or more XPath queries in the code to true to enable evaluation of the effect on the system parameter.

18. The method of claim 17 in which the system parameter comprises pixel buffer level.

19. The method of claim 17 including a further step of indicating error conditions in the code through the user interface.

20. The method of claim 19 in which the indicating is performed using one of color coding, underlining, pop-ups, textual indicators, or graphic indicators that are displayed in the editing window.