METHODS OF INCREASING ACCURACY OF SOOT LOAD ESTIMATES

• US 20090308052A1
• Filed: 06/13/2008
• Published: 12/17/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/13/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Cummins Filtration Incorporated (Cummins Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Cummins Filtration Incorporated (Cummins Incorporated)
• Inventors: Zhang, Yuetao, Wilhelm, Daniel D.
• Granted Patent: US 8,316,635 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 60/274
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 11/00 Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus , e.g. for catalytic activity safety, indicating or supervising devices for internal combustion engines F02B77/08; testing of machines G01M13/00
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 2550/04 Filtering activity of particulate filters
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 9/002 of filter regeneration, e.g. detection of clogging
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 Engine management systems

Abstract

A method for improving the effectiveness of filters by increasing accuracy of an estimate of particulate matter loading remaining in the filter after cleaning. In one embodiment, the disclosed method includes removing soot from the DPF by cleaning, and measuring parameters for a set of predetermined criteria. The amount of soot present in the DPF is then estimated based on delta pressure. The resulting estimated soot load value accounts for the noise factors such as ash loading after extended operation. The value is then used to adjust for future measurements of soot loading in the DPF after subsequent regeneration treatments and/or used to diagnose the effectiveness of the cleaning. The method can also be applied to diagnostics of the DPF. When discrepancies between DPSLE and model-based soot load estimate are observed in healthy regenerations, failure modes such as plugged filter, extreme ash loading or substrate melting can be detected.

Claims

1. A method of compensating for measurement inaccuracies in a filter, the method comprising:

after a cleaning procedure on the filter that is intended to eliminate removable particulate matter from the filter, determining an estimate of removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter after the cleaning procedure; and

determining a first disparate value by quantifying a difference between;

(1) the estimated removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter after the cleaning procedure; and

(2) a reference value.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the estimate comprises

applying inputs to a function of pressure drop across the filter and volumetric flow rate, the inputs including observed pressure drop across the filter and observed volumetric flow rate, and

estimating the removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter based on the reference value.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference value is obtained by a calibration of a fresh filter having substantially no contaminants.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cleaning procedure on the filter is continued until at least one predetermined criteria is met, the predetermined criteria being used to indicate when a sufficient amount of removable particulate matter has been eliminated.

5. The method claim 4, wherein the predetermined criteria comprise at least one of:

a duration of the cleaning of the filter, a volumetric flow rate of fluid through the filter, or a temperature of an inlet of a filter during the cleaning of the filter.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the predetermined criteria is met when:

(1) a percentage of time during a cleaning period in which a filter inlet temperature meets or exceeds a targeted temperature is above a predefined threshold; and

(2) a percentage of time during the cleaning period in which a volumetric flow rate through the filter meets or exceeds a requested flow rate is above a predefined threshold.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting the reference value based on the disparate value so as to generate a first adjusted reference value.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

conducting a subsequent cleaning of the filter;

determining an estimate of removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter after the subsequent cleaning;

determining a second disparate value by quantifying a difference between;

(1) the estimated removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter after the subsequent cleaning; and

(2) the first adjusted reference value; and

adjusting the first adjusted measured value based on the second disparate value so as to generate a second adjusted reference value.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein determining the estimate of the removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter comprises

applying inputs to a function of pressure drop across the filter and volumetric flow rate, the inputs including observed pressure drop across the filter and observed volumetric flow rate, and

estimating the removable particulate matter loading remaining in the filter based on the first adjusted reference value.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the filter is a diesel particulate filter, and the removable particulate matter is soot.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the estimate comprises measuring a delta pressure based soot load estimate.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising determining whether the measured delta pressure based soot load estimate is above a predefined threshold when predetermined conditions are met at an end of the cleaning procedure.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein a fault is logged when the delta pressure based soot load estimate is above the predefined threshold.

14. A method of diagnosing the healthiness of a regeneration of a diesel particulate filter, the method comprising:

determining, over a time period of an active regeneration, an estimate of soot loading in the diesel particulate filter;

determining whether predetermined criteria for the healthiness of the regeneration are met over the time period of the active regeneration, the regeneration being healthy when the predetermined criteria are met; and

when the regeneration is determined to be healthy, verifying that the regeneration is healthy by determining whether the estimated soot loading in the diesel particulate filter is above a predefined threshold at an end of the time period of the active regeneration.

15. A method of claim 14, wherein determining the estimate comprises

applying inputs to a function of delta pressure and volumetric flow rate, the inputs including observed delta pressure and observed volumetric flow rate, and

estimating the soot loading based on a calibration of a fresh diesel particulate filter having substantially no contaminants.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the predetermined criteria are met when:

(1) a percentage of time during the time period of the active regeneration in which the inlet temperature meets or exceeds the targeted inlet temperature is above a predefined threshold,

(2) a percentage of time during the time period of the active regeneration in which the volumetric flow rate meets or exceeds the requested volumetric flow rate is above a predefined threshold, and

(3) a model-based soot load estimate is lower than a predefined threshold at the end of the time period of the active regeneration.

17. The method of claim 14, further comprising logging a fault when the estimated soot loading in the diesel particulate filter is above the predefined threshold at the end of the time period of the active regeneration.