Hybrid human/computer image processing method

• US 20090313078A1
• Filed: 06/02/2009
• Published: 12/17/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/12/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Geoffrey Cross
• Original Assignee: Geoffrey Cross
• Inventors: CROSS, Geoffrey (Mark, Timothy)
• Application Number:
  US12/457,131
• Publication Number:
  US 20090313078A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/9
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06311 Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/10016 Video; Image sequence
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/20101 Interactive definition of point of interest, landmark or seed
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/30236 Traffic on road, railway or crossing
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/30252 Vehicle exterior; Vicinity of vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 7/70 Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras camera calibration G06T7/80
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 10/987 with the intervention of an operator
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 20/582 of traffic signs

Abstract

There is provided a hybrid human/computing arrangement which advantageously involves humans in the process of scrutinizing video image frames and processing said video image frames to detect and characterize objects of interest while ignoring other features of said image frame. The invention overcomes the problems of missed and false detections by humans. Said features of interest may comprise equipment and installations found on or in the vicinity of roads including road signs of the type commonly used for traffic control, warning, and informational display.

Claims

1. A method for using human assistance in processing video data comprising the steps of

a) providing a centre comprising a central coordinating server for defining and coordinating Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs);

b) providing a first set of workers comprising humans, wherein each said worker is equipped with computer workstations and linked to said centre via the internet;

c) providing a video data source;

d) said video data source transmitting an input video sequence comprising frames containing images of objects in a scene to said centre;

e) said centre defining objects of interest and configuring said input video sequence into a first set of HITs, wherein each HIT is allocated to a particular worker, wherein each said HIT comprises a set of frames sampled from said input video sequence;

f) said centre despatching said HITs to said workstations;

g) said workers searching their allotted set of frames one frame at a time for said objects of interest, said objects being selected using a computer data entry operation;

h) said workers each transmitting a signal signifying an object detection to said centre when an object of interest is detected;

i) said centre clustering said object detections into groups associated with said object of interest and deeming an object detection valid if a predetermined number of said object detections is collected;

j) in the event of one or more workers failing to deliver a predetermined number of object detections, said center re-transmitting HITs to other workers, said other workers repeating steps (f) to (j) until the requisite number of object detections has been achieved or the number of presentations of said HITs exceeds a predefined number, in which case the object detection is deemed invalid; and

k) said centre computing 3D location coordinates for each valid object detection.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of;

l) said centre annotating each frame deemed to contain objects of interest by inserting a symbol at an image point corresponding to the location of each said object of interest;

m) said centre configuring the annotated frames as a second set of HITs for distribution to a second set of workers;

n) said centre despatching said second set of HITs to said second set of workers;

o) said centre providing a database of sign images that is displayed within a menu at the workstation of each worker;

p) said workers each clicking on the database image that most closely matches said annotated frame object, each said click being recorded at the centre, each said click signifying a database image selection;

q) said centre pooling database image selections received for each annotated frame object;

r) said centre analysing the pooled database image selections for each annotated frame object to identify the database image with the highest click score; and

s) said centre assigning the attributes of the highest scoring database image to each annotated frame object.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said centre performs the functions of image processing task definition and HIT allocation.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said centre performs the functions of image-processing task definition, HIT allocation and at least one of worker payment, worker scoring and worker training.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said video data source comprises at least one vehicle mounted camera.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said video data source comprises at least one fixed camera installation.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said input video data source is a video database at said centre.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein said input video sequence divided into a multiplicity of video sub sequences sampled in such a way that each worker analyses frames spanning the entire video sequence, wherein each said video sub sequence is allocated to a separated worker.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein said video sequence is augmented with location data provided by at least one of Global Positioning System (GPS) or Differential Global Positioning System (d-GPS) transponder/receiver, or relative position via Inertial Navigation System (INS) systems, or a combination of GPS and INS systems.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein said computer data entry operation is a mouse point and click operation.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said HITs comprise at least one video image frame.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said HITs comprise video image frames annotated with information relating to the 3D locations of objects in scenes depicted in said frames.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said workers comprises unqualified workers.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein said workers comprise qualified workers.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein said workers work in association with a computer image processing system.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein said analysis of pooled object detections is performed automatically.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein said centre is a business entity.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein said centre is a computer system.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein said objects of interest are road signs.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein said objects of interest are items of roadside equipment.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein said workers are one of university educated, at most secondary school educated, and not formally educated.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein said HIT is associated with multiple attributes related to performance of said task, the attributes comprising at least one of accuracy attribute, a timeout attribute, a maximum time spent attribute, a maximum cost per task attribute, and a maximum total cost attribute.

23. The method of claim 1 wherein the dispatching of HITs by the centre is performed using a defined application programming interface.

24. The method of claim 1 wherein the dispatching of HITs to workers includes providing an indication to the workers of the payment to be provided for performance of the HIT if the worker chooses to perform the HIT.

25. The method of claim 1 wherein the providing of the payment to the worker is performed in response to the receiving from the worker of the first result from the performance of the HIT.

26. The method of claim 1 wherein the payment provided to the worker for the performance of the HIT is based in part on quality of the performance of the HIT.

27. The method of claim 1 wherein the payment provided to the worker is based at least in part on the past quality of performance of HITs by the worker.

28. The method of claim 1 wherein the dispatching of the HIT to the worker includes providing an indication to the worker of compensation associated with performance of the HIT.

29. The method of claim 2 wherein said second set of workers may be identical to said second set of workers.

30. The method of claim 2 wherein said first set of workers is unqualified and said second set of workers is qualified.

31. The method of claim 2 wherein said attributes comprise matches to specific signs depicted in traffic sign reference manuals.

32. The method of claim 2 wherein said attributes comprise matches to specific signs depicted in the Traffic Signs Manual published by the United Kingdom Department for Transport.

33. The method of claim 2 wherein said attributes comprise membership of a particular class of signs.

34. The method of claim 2 wherein said attributes comprise membership of a class of signs within a hierarchy of signs.

35. The method of claim 1 wherein said data entry operation employs a touch screen.