Method and System for Generating Analogous Fictional Data From Non-Fictional Data

• US 20090319520A1
• Filed: 08/28/2009
• Published: 12/24/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/06/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Basile, Ryan M.
• Granted Patent: US 7,958,162 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/258 Data format conversion from or to a database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9014 hash tables
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/383 Anonymous user system

Abstract

A method and system for generating analogous fictional data from non-fictional data, is provided. One implementation involves recording non-fictional data, scoring the non-fictional data in terms of occurrence percentile, obtaining a set of user-configurations that represents a likeness range between non-fictional data and corresponding fictional data, based on the scores and the user-configurations, generating analogous fictional data from the non-fictional data, and comparing hash values for the fictional data with hash values for the non-fictional data to determine matches, and in case of matches, generating analogous fictional data from the non-fictional data based on the scores and incrementally lowered likeness range, whereby entire records of fictional data are generated based on entire records of non-fictional data, wherein the fictional data is consistent with the non-fictional data.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for generating a second data set from a first data set comprising:

determining an occurrence value for each element of said first data set pertaining to the quantity of occurrences of that element within said first data set;

receiving a similarity value configured by a user indicating a desired similarity between said first and second data sets; and

generating said second data set to include elements with said occurrence values for said second data set based on said occurrence values of elements of said first data set and said similarity value, wherein said second data set includes elements with occurrences based on occurrence of elements in said first data set.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said first data set includes non-fictional data and said second data set includes fictional data.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein entire records of fictional data are generated based on entire records of non-fictional data, and wherein said fictional data is consistent with said non-fictional data.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said generating said second data set further includes:

examining said occurrence value of each element in said first data set and retrieving for placement in said second data set another element of said first data set with an occurrence value within a range indicated by said similarity value to provide said desired similarity.

5. The method of claim 4, further including:

comparing elements of said first and second data sets; and

generating new elements for said second data set in response to matching elements with said first data set by adjusting said similarity value for decreased similarity and replacing each matching element in said second data set with another element of said first data set with an occurrence value based on said adjusted similarity value.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said comparing elements of said first and second data sets further includes:

determining hash values for said first and second data sets; and

comparing said hash values of said first and second data sets to determine said matching elements.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said first and second data sets are stored in respective first and second databases with identical schemas of rows and columns, and said determining said hash values further includes:

determining said hash values for each row and column value of said first and second databases; and

selectively determining a hash value from two or more column values selected by a user to produce a combined hash value for said comparison.

8. A computer system for generating a second data set from a first data set comprising:

at least one storage system for storing a computer program; and

at least one processor for processing said computer program to;

determine an occurrence value for each element of said first data set pertaining to the quantity of occurrences of that element within said first data set;

receive a similarity value configured by a user indicating a desired similarity between said first and second data sets; and

generate said second data set to include elements with said occurrence values for said second data set based on said occurrence values of elements of said first data set and said similarity value, wherein said second data set includes elements with occurrences based on occurrence of elements in said first data set.

9. The computer system of claim 8, wherein said first data set includes non-fictional data and said second data set includes fictional data.

10. The computer system of claim 9, wherein entire records of fictional data are generated based on entire records of non-fictional data, and wherein said fictional data is consistent with said non-fictional data.

11. The computer system of claim 8, wherein generation of said second data set further includes:

examining said occurrence value of each element in said first data set and retrieving for placement in said second data set another element of said first data set with an occurrence value within a range indicated by said similarity value to provide said desired similarity.

12. The computer system of claim 11, wherein said processor further processes said computer program to:

compare elements of said first and second data sets; and

generate new elements for said second data set in response to matching elements with said first data set by adjusting said similarity value for decreased similarity and replacing each matching element in said second data set with another element of said first data set with an occurrence value based on said adjusted similarity value.

13. The computer system of claim 12, wherein comparison of elements of said first and second data sets further includes:

determining hash values for said first and second data sets; and

comparing said hash values of said first and second data sets to determine said matching elements.

14. The computer system of claim 13, wherein said first and second data sets are stored in respective first and second databases with identical schemas of rows and columns, and said determining said hash values further includes:

determining said hash values for each row and column value of said first and second databases; and

selectively determining a hash value from two or more column values selected by a user to produce a combined hash value for said comparison.

15. A computer program product for generating a second data set from a first data set, the computer program product comprising:

a computer useable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, the computer readable program code comprising computer readable program code to;

determine an occurrence value for each element of said first data set pertaining to the quantity of occurrences of that element within said first data set;

receive a similarity value configured by a user indicating a desired similarity between said first and second data sets; and

generate said second data set to include elements with said occurrence values for said second data set based on said occurrence values of elements of said first data set and said similarity value, wherein said second data set includes elements with occurrences based on occurrence of elements in said first data set.

16. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein said first data set includes non-fictional data and said second data set includes fictional data.

17. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein entire records of fictional data are generated based on entire records of non-fictional data, and wherein said fictional data is consistent with said non-fictional data.

18. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein generation of said second data set further includes:

examining said occurrence value of each element in said first data set and retrieving for placement in said second data set another element of said first data set with an occurrence value within a range indicated by said similarity value to provide said desired similarity.

19. The computer program product of claim 18, wherein said computer readable program code further includes computer readable program code to:

compare elements of said first and second data sets; and

generate new elements for said second data set in response to matching elements with said first data set by adjusting said similarity value for decreased similarity and replacing each matching element in said second data set with another element of said first data set with an occurrence value based on said adjusted similarity value.

20. The computer program product of claim 19, wherein comparison of elements of said first and second data sets further includes:

determining hash values for said first and second data sets; and

comparing said hash values of said first and second data sets to determine said matching elements.

21. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein said first and second data sets are stored in respective first and second databases with identical schemas of rows and columns, and said determining said hash values further includes:

determining said hash values for each row and column value of said first and second databases; and

selectively determining a hash value from two or more column values selected by a user to produce a combined hash value for said comparison.