INTERACTIVE ORGANIZATIONAL INSTRUCTION SYSTEM

• US 20090327052A1
• Filed: 06/30/2008
• Published: 12/31/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/30/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Brian D. Wong, Lawrence R. Mcevoy II
• Original Assignee: Brian D. Wong, Lawrence R. Mcevoy II
• Inventors: McEvoy, Lawrence R. II, Wong, Brian D.
• Application Number:
  US12/165,393
• Publication Number:
  US 20090327052A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.11
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/205 Education administration or guidance

Abstract

A system for instructing a group of participants to function individually within an organization having a functional purpose. The system teaches four lifetime leadership lessons which include (1) adopting a set of universal attributes of a trusted colleague, (2) finding common ground as a community of trusted colleagues, (3) having conversations the participants need to have, the way they need to have them, and (4) making a correct, unifying “diagnosis” before starting “treatment” (also known as “seeing the whole elephant”). Beyond being taught these lessons, the participants are enabled to apply the lessons to solve any problem, in any part of the organization. Further, organizational change can be accelerated by these participants when they teach one or more of the four lessons to others in the organization.

Claims

1. A method of training each participant within a plurality of participants to function individually within an organization having a functional purpose, each participant of the plurality of participants belonging to the organization, and the plurality of participants performing the method together as a group, the method comprising:

developing a first description of a desired state of the organization in which the organization is able to at least partially achieve its functional purpose, the desired state being more desirable than a present state of the organization;

developing a second description of an undesired state of the organization in which the organization is less able to at least partially achieve its functional purpose, the undesired state being less desirable than the present state of the organization;

evaluating the present state of the organization to determine whether it is closer to the desired state or the undesired state;

evaluating an ability of a participant to modify the present state of the organization moving the present state toward one of the desired state and the undesired state;

validating a list of universal attributes comprising a list of desirable behaviors for a member of the organization;

developing a list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable behaviors for a member of the organization; and

providing a commitment to try to exhibit at least a portion of the behaviors on the list of desirable behaviors of the list of universal attributes and to forgo at least a portion of the behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors of the list of graffiti behaviors.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a fact pattern including a conversation having at least two roles;

being assigned one of the at least two roles, the other of the at least two roles being assigned to another of the plurality of participants;

role-playing the conversation in a manner that renders the conversation ineffective, the role play including a response;

repeating the role-play of the conversation; and

during the repeated role-play, pausing before providing the response and providing a different response than the response provided during the previous role play.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein providing the commitment comprises:

developing a compact comprising a description of a desirable environment within the organization, a list of behaviors the participants agree they would be willing to exhibit in exchange for the realization of the desirable environment within the organization, and a list of behaviors the participants agree they would be willing to forego in exchange for the realization of the desirable environment within the organization, the list of behaviors the participants would be willing to forego comprising the portion of the desirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors, and the list of behaviors the participants would be willing to exhibit comprising the portion of the undesirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes; and

indicating acceptance of the compact.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

obtaining a single description of agreed upon characteristics of a satisfactory team experience;

evaluating the characteristics of a satisfactory team experience in view of the universal attributes; and

defining a desirable team as being composed of members exhibiting the universal attributes.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving an explanation of a dialogue model;

receiving an explanation of the dialogue model modified to include the list of universal attributes, the list of graffiti behaviors, the desired state, and the undesired state;

selecting an actual feared or dreaded future conversation;

dividing the group into a plurality of subgroups; and

within each subgroup of the plurality of subgroups, role playing the feared or dreaded conversation.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving an explanation of a dialogue model;

receiving an explanation of the dialogue model modified to include the list of universal attributes, list of graffiti behaviors, desired state, and undesired state;

dividing the group into a plurality of subgroups;

within each subgroup of the plurality of subgroups, role playing a plurality of practice conversations; and

creating a plan to have a predetermined number of conversations at least one of which being based on one of the plurality of practice conversations.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein developing the list of graffiti behaviors comprises:

as a group, developing a first list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable group behaviors for the members of the organization; and

as a group, developing a second list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable personal behaviors of the members of the organization.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising developing the list of universal attributes.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein developing the list of universal attributes comprises describing the desirable behaviors of a best colleague.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the ability of the participant to modify the present state of the organization moving the present state toward one of the desired state and the undesired state comprises:

evaluating the effect of the undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors on the present state and the effect of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes on the present state;

determining whether the undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors move the present state closer to the undesired state and the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes move the present state closer to the desired state, and

determining whether the undesirable behaviors move the present state by a larger amount than the desirable behaviors.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

evaluating the effect of the undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors on the present state; and

determining whether the undesired state is a result of the exhibition of the list of undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors by at least a portion of the organization.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

evaluating the effect of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes on the present state; and

determining whether the desired state is a result of the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes by at least a portion of the organization.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

evaluating the effect of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes on the present state; and

determining whether the desired state is a result of the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes by a majority portion of the organization.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

evaluating the effect of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes on the present state; and

determining whether the desirable environment within the organization is a result of the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes by at least a portion of the organization.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

evaluating a result of the exhibition of a behavior on the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

determining whether the exhibition of the behavior on the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes is more likely to cause others to exhibit a behavior on the list of desirable behaviors of the list of universal attributes than to exhibit a behavior on the list of undesirable behaviors of the list of graffiti behaviors;

evaluating a result of the exhibition of a behavior on the list of undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors; and

determining whether the exhibition of the behavior on the list of undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors is more likely to cause others to exhibit a behavior on the list of undesirable behaviors on the list of graffiti behaviors than to exhibit a behavior on the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying barriers in the organization to exhibiting the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

prioritizing the barriers identified; and

using the prioritization of the barriers to create a plan to reduce or remove those barriers thereby adapting the organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying accelerators in the organization that facilitate the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

prioritizing the accelerators identified; and

using the prioritization of the accelerators to create a plan to promote or enhance those accelerators thereby adapting the organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

18. A method of addressing behavioral problems within a selected organization that interfere with its performance of its functional purpose, the method comprising:

creating a group of group members comprising at least one member of the selected organization and a plurality of members of at least one different organization that is experiencing behavioral problems by its members that interfere with its performance of its functional purpose;

directing the group to develop a single first description of a desired state in which both the selected organization and the at least one different organization would be able to at least partially perform their respective functional purposes, the desired state being more desirable than a first present state of the selected organization and a second present state of the at least one different organization;

directing the group to develop a single second description of an undesired state in which both the selected organization and the at least one different organization would be less able to at least partially perform their respective functional purposes, the undesired state being less desirable than the first present state of the selected organization and the second present state of the at least one different organization;

directing the group to evaluate an ability of a set of behaviors exhibited by a member of the selected organization and a member of the at least one different organization to move the first present state of the selected organization and the second present state of the at least one different organization, respectively, toward the desired state;

directing the group to validate a single list of universal attributes comprising a list of desirable behaviors for a member of the selected organization and a member of the at least one different organization;

directing the group to develop a single list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable behaviors for a member of the selected organization and a member of the at least one different organization; and

obtaining from the at least one member of the selected organization and the plurality of members of the at least one different organization an indication of agreement to exhibit at least a portion of behaviors on the list of desirable behaviors of the single list of universal attributes and to forgo at least a portion of behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors of the single list of graffiti behaviors.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein obtaining the indication of agreement from the at least one member of the selected organization and the plurality of members of the at least one different organization comprises:

directing the group to develop a single compact comprising;

a description of a desirable environment within the selected organization and the at least one different organization,

the portion of behaviors on the list of desirable behaviors of the single list of universal attributes, and

the portion of behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors of the single list of graffiti behaviors, the compact comprising a promise to exhibit the portion of behaviors on the list of desirable behaviors of the single list of universal attributes and to forgo the portion of behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors of the single list of graffiti behaviors in exchange for the realization of the desirable environment within the selected organization and the at least one different organization; and

obtaining an indication of acceptance of the compact by the at least one member of the selected organization and the plurality of members of the at least one different organization.

20. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

directing the group to develop a single description of agreed upon characteristics of a satisfactory team experience; and

directing the group to evaluate the characteristics of a satisfactory team experience in view of the universal attributes.

21. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model;

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model modified to include the list of universal attributes, list of graffiti behaviors, desired state, and undesired state;

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to create a list of practice conversations having varying levels of difficulty;

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to role-play at least one of the practice conversations on the list with at least one of the other group members; and

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to create a plan to have a predetermined number of conversations at least one of which is based on the at least one practice conversation.

22. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model;

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model modified to include the list of universal attributes, the list of graffiti behaviors, the desired state, and the undesired state;

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to select an actual future conversation the at least one member plans to have in the future; and

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to role-play the future conversation with at least one of the other group members.

23. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

presenting to the group a fact pattern including a conversation having at least two roles;

assigning one of the at least two roles to the at least one member of the selected organization;

assigning another of the at least two roles to at least one of the other group members;

directing the at least one member of the selected organization and the at least one of the other group members to role-play the conversation in a manner that renders the conversation ineffective, the role play including a response; and

directing the at least one member of the selected organization and the at least one of the other group members to repeat the role-play of the conversation, further directing the at least one member of the selected organization and the at least one of the other group members during the repeated role-play, to pause before providing the response and provide a different response than the response provided during the previous role play.

24. The method of claim 18, wherein directing the group to develop the list of graffiti behaviors comprises:

directing the group to develop a first list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable group behaviors for the selected organization and the at least one different organization; and

directing the group to develop a second list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable personal behaviors of the group members.

25. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

directing the group to develop the single list of universal attributes comprising the list of desirable behaviors for the member of the selected organization and the member of the at least one different organization.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein directing the group to develop the list of universal attributes includes directing the group to develop the list of universal attributes by describing the desirable behaviors of a best colleague.

27. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

directing the group to identify barriers present in both the selected organization and the at least one different organization to exhibiting the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

directing the group to prioritize the barriers; and

directing the group to use the prioritization of the barriers to create a plan to reduce or remove those barriers thereby adapting the selected organization and the at least one different organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

28. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

directing the group to identify accelerators present in both the selected organization and the at least one different organization that facilitate the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

directing the group to prioritize the accelerators identified; and

directing the group to use the prioritization of the accelerators to create a plan to promote or enhance those accelerators thereby adapting the selected organization and the at least one different organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

29. A method of obtaining a compact from a plurality of members of an organization having a present working environment, the compact comprising a promise from each of members of the plurality of members to exhibit behavior that will improve the working environment of the organization, the method comprising from the plurality of members:

obtaining a description of the improved working environment;

obtaining a description of a deteriorated working environment;

obtaining an evaluation of an ability of individual behavior to influence the present working environment toward one of the improved working environment and the deteriorated working environment;

obtaining a list of desirable behaviors and a list of undesirable behaviors;

using the evaluation of the ability of individual behavior to influence the working environment to develop the compact comprising a promise to forego behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors and to exhibit behaviors on the list desirable behaviors thereby promising to influence the present working environment toward the improved working environment; and

obtaining an indication of acceptance of the compact.

30. A method of addressing behavioral problems within a selected organization that interfere with its performance of its functional purpose, the method comprising:

creating a group of group members comprising at least one member of the selected organization;

directing the group to develop a single first description of a desired state in which the selected organization would be able to at least partially perform its respective functional purposes, the desired state being more desirable than a present state of the selected organization;

directing the group to develop a single second description of an undesired state in which the selected organization would be less able to at least partially perform its respective functional purposes, the undesired state being less desirable than the present state of the selected organization;

directing the group to evaluate an ability of a set of behaviors exhibited by a member of the selected organization to move the first present state of the selected organization toward the desired state;

directing the group to validate a single list of universal attributes comprising a list of desirable behaviors for a member of the selected organization;

directing the group to develop a single list of graffiti behaviors comprising a list of undesirable behaviors for a member of the selected organization; and

obtaining from the at least one member of the selected organization an indication of agreement to exhibit at least a portion of behaviors on the list of desirable behaviors of the single list of universal attributes and to forgo at least a portion of behaviors on the list of undesirable behaviors of the single list of graffiti behaviors.

31. The method of claim 30, further comprising:

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model;

presenting to the group an explanation of the dialogue model modified to include the list of universal attributes, the list of graffiti behaviors, the desired state, and the undesired state;

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to select an actual future conversation the at least one member plans to have in the future; and

directing the at least one member of the selected organization to role-play the future conversation with at least one of the other group members.

32. The method of claim 30, further comprising:

directing the group to identify barriers present in the selected organization to exhibiting the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

directing the group to prioritize the barriers; and

directing the group to use the prioritization of the barriers to create a plan to reduce or remove those barriers thereby adapting the selected organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.

33. The method of claim 30, further comprising:

directing the group to identify accelerators present in the selected organization that facilitate the exhibition of the list of desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes;

directing the group to prioritize the accelerators identified; and

directing the group to use the prioritization of the accelerators to create a plan to promote or enhance those accelerators thereby adapting the selected organization to facilitate the exhibition of the desirable behaviors on the list of universal attributes.