Safes without weak parts

• US 20100012003A1
• Filed: 07/19/2008
• Published: 01/21/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 07/19/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ailian Wang, Wanduan Huang, Weihua Wang, Yujian Huang, Yuling Huang, Yuming Huang, Yuzhu Huang
• Original Assignee: Ailian Wang, Wanduan Huang, Weihua Wang, Yujian Huang, Yuling Huang, Yuming Huang, Yuzhu Huang
• Inventors: Wang, Weihua, Wang, Ailian, Huang, Wanduan, Huang, Yujian, Huang, Yuming, Huang, Yuzhu, Huang, Yuling
• Application Number:
  US12/176,337
• Publication Number:
  US 20100012003A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 109/23
• CPC Class Codes: E05G 1/02 Details safe hinges E05D7/14

Abstract

The security class or burglary resistant capability of a safe is determined by the safe'"'"'s weakest parts: combinations lock, key lock, keyboard, LCD screen, card reader, fingerprint scanner, etc (referred as weak parts below). The results of an attack to the safe include opening safe door, digging holes on safe door or body, or dysfunction of the above weak parts. The corresponding consequences are: Objects deposited inside the safe are stolen or destroyed. Even if those objects stay intact, the safe owner is no longer able to operate the safe. A new design method about safe is disclosed in this invention. The new safe has no weak parts on its surface. It'"'"'s obvious that weak parts are easier to destroy than safe door and body, which is why they are called weak parts. For safes without weak parts on their surface, these weak parts (in user'"'"'s hand or inside safe) are not so easy to be attacked on. The GSA class or UL Certification is improved for the new safe. Users will find the new safe is more secure and convenient to use. The design method applies to other security containers and doors.

Claims

1. A design method of a safe which makes all the weak parts (For example, keyboard and LCD screen on the door of an existing safe.) disappears from the safe surface or physically inaccessible. Users may use the invented safe key which bears functionality of the weak parts, to open the safe.

2. The design method of claim 1, applies to all the security containers and entrance control objects (door, gate).

3. The security containers and entrance control objects in claim 2, can be metal based (For example, safe body and door are made of metal) or multiple kinds materials based (safe body and door are made of metal or non-metal).

5. The security containers and entrance control objects in claim 2, can be with a handle or without a handle.

6. The weak parts in claim 1, includes combinations lock, key lock, keyboard, LCD screen, card reader, fingerprint scanner, etc. They are easier to destroy than safe body, door and handle, which is why they are called weak parts. They are the parts which allow users to “

talk”

to safe controller. At least one of them exists on the surface of all currently available safes. Right now, users can not open their safe in normal (non-destructive) way without the weak parts.

7. Security container system or entrance control system which is based on the design method in claim 2.

4. The signal transfer between a safe and a key can be done through a physical contact between the safe and the key, or without a physical contact between the safe and the key.

8. The safe in claim 4, can be a security container or an entrance control object (door, gate).