Material Condition Assessment with Eddy Current Sensors

• US 20100026285A1
• Filed: 06/15/2009
• Published: 02/04/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 01/28/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Jentek Sensors, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Jentek Sensors, Inc.
• Inventors: Goldfine, Neil J., Grundy, David C., Schlicker, Darrell E., Washabaugh, Andrew P., Lyons, Robert J., Sheiretov, Yanko K., Windoloski, Mark D., Craven, Christopher A., Tsukernik, Vladimir B.
• Granted Patent: US 7,812,601 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/228
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 27/9046 by analysing electrical signals

Abstract

Eddy current sensors and sensor arrays are used for process quality and material condition assessment of conducting materials. In an embodiment, changes in spatially registered high resolution images taken before and after cold work processing reflect the quality of the process, such as intensity and coverage. These images also permit the suppression or removal of local outlier variations. Anisotropy in a material property, such as magnetic permeability or electrical conductivity, can be intentionally introduced and used to assess material condition resulting from an operation, such as a cold work or heat treatment. The anisotropy is determined by sensors that provide directional property measurements. The sensor directionality arises from constructs that use a linear conducting drive segment to impose the magnetic field in a test material. Maintaining the orientation of this drive segment, and associated sense elements, relative to a material edge provides enhanced sensitivity for crack detection at edges.

Claims

1. A method for assessing cold work process quality of a test material comprising:

a) placing an eddy current sensor proximate to a surface of the test material prior to cold working;

b) measuring a sensor response at a plurality of registered positions along the surface;

c) combining the sensor response with position information to form a spatial response in at least one dimension;

d) cold working the material and repeating steps a) and c); and

e) comparing responses obtained before and after cold working at registered positions to assess cold work quality.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, step d) further comprising:

maintaining the same spatial registration for the spatial response before and after cold working.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cold work process is shot peening and the response is a two-dimensional image of a property.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cold work quality is measured in terms of coverage.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cold work quality is measured in a manner correlated with an alternate scale for cold work intensity such as residual stress or Almen intensity.

6. The method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the cold work quality is measured in terms of uniformity of cold work intensity.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the test material is a nickel alloy.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sensor measurement is performed at a single excitation frequency.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sensor measurement is performed at multiple excitation frequencies.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sensor response corrects for roughness variation.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising converting the sensor response to a property value using a physics based model.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11 where the conversion is made using a precomputed database of sensor responses at one or more excitation frequencies.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sensor is a flexible array that can conform to the complex surface geometries.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the test material is an engine component and the responses are two-dimensional images of a property related to cold work quality.

15. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein local outlier sensor responses are suppressed or removed so that an average sensor response without the outlier values can be recorded.

16. The method as claimed in claim 1 further including assessing cold work variations across a surface of the test material as a function of spatial resolution of the sensor response.

17. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cold work includes burnishing.

18. The method as claimed in claim 1 further including detecting cracks as a function of the eddy current sensor response.