APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO HOST AN ONLINE MARKETPLACE

• US 20100030622A1
• Filed: 07/28/2009
• Published: 02/04/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 07/29/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Inderpal Guglani
• Original Assignee: Inderpal Guglani
• Inventors: Guglani, Inderpal
• Application Number:
  US12/510,566
• Publication Number:
  US 20100030622A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/10
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0217 involving input on products or services in exchange for incentives or rewards
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0241 Advertisements
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0611 Request for offers or quotes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/08 Auctions

Abstract

A device configured to host a marketplace on at least one network is provided. A method of providing such a device is also disclosed. The apparatus includes at least one computer device configured to communicate with a plurality of clients via at least one network. The clients may include vendors, such as sellers, and customers, such as buyers. The one or more computer devices include at least one processing unit. The at least one computer device is configured to determine a vendor quality rating, providing bidding segmentation or provide customer feedback blocking. Methods of providing vendor quality ratings, bidding segmentation or customer feedback blocking are also provided.

Claims

1-25. -25. (canceled)

26. An apparatus configured to host a marketplace on at least one network comprising:

at least one computer device configured to communicate with a plurality of clients via at least one network connection, the clients comprising vendors and customers;

the at least one computer device comprised of at least one processing unit, the at least one processing unit configured to provide feedback for the vendors such that the feedback is displayable to customers, the at least one computer device configured to provide feedback such that the vendors are permitted to block a portion of feedback the customers transmit to the at least one computer device; and

the portion of the feedback a vendor is permitted to block being determined by assigning a feedback block rate that is correlated with a vendor quality rating or a feedback block amount to the vendor that is correlated with a vendor quality rating.

27. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the at least one computer device is also comprised of at least one memory that is accessible by the at least one processing unit, the at least one memory having vendor data, the vendor data comprised of at least one of vendor quality rating data, vendor block rate data and vendor block allowance data.

28. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the feedback block rate or feedback block amount is correlated with the vendor quality rating such that a vendor with a first quality rating is permitted to block more feedback than a vendor having a quality rating that is lower than the first quality rating.

29. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the feedback block rate or feedback block amount is correlated with the vendor quality rating such that a vendor with a first quality rating is permitted to block more feedback than a vendor having a quality rating that is higher than the first quality rating.

30. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the portion of feedback a vendor is permitted to block is determined by the at least one computer device assigning a block allowance for a time period to each vendor, the vendor being able to block feedback until the block allowance is exhausted within the time period.

31. The apparatus of claim 30 wherein the block allowance is determined by multiplying cumulative earnings of the vendor within a time period by a block allowance rate, the block allowance rate assigned such that a vendor with a first quality rating receives a greater block allowance rate than a vendor having a quality rating that is less than the first quality rating.

32. The apparatus of claim 30 wherein the block allowance is determined by multiplying cumulative earning of the vendor within a time period by a block allowance rate, the block allowance rate assigned such that a vendor with a first quality rating receives a greater block allowance rate than a vendor having a quality rating that is greater than the first quality rating.

33. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the at least one computer device is at least one server or at least one workstation.

34. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the at least one processing unit is at least one of a program configured for processing by the at least one computer device, a central microprocessor, a server microprocessor and a processor comprised of at least one semiconductor.

35. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the marketplace is configured to permit freelance contractors to bid on request for proposals submitted by customers.

36. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the at least one computer device is configured to communicate with the clients via internetworking.

37. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the feedback is blocked such that the blocked feedback is not displayable to customers.

38. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein the at least one computer device is also configured to determine quote submission acceptability for a vendor by a processing method comprising determining a number of bids the vendor receives for a time period, determining a cost of bids for each quote submitted by the vendor, and determining a remaining number of bids for the vendor within the time period, the at least one computer device configured to not permit a quote submission by the vendor when the cost of bids submitted by the vendor for a quote within the time period is effectively greater than the remaining number of bids for the vendor within the time period.

39. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the at least one computer device is configured such that the cost of bids for submitting a quote is determined such that a vendor with a first quality rating has a higher cost of bids than a vendor with a quality rating that is lower than the first quality rating.

40. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the cost of bids for a quote submitted by a vendor within the time period is determined by the at least one processing unit determining a type of quote submitted by the vendor within the time period and determining the bid cost for the type of quote.

41. The apparatus of claim 40 wherein the types of quotes are comprised of a standard quote and at least one premium quote, the bid cost for a standard quote being less than the bid cost for the at least one premium quote.

42. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the at least one computer device is configured such that the number of bids the vendor receives for the time period is determined such that a vendor with a first quality rating has a lower cost of bids relative to a vendor with a quality rating that is lower than the first quality rating.

43. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the at least one computer device is configured such that the number of bids the vendor receives for the time period is determined such that a vendor with a first quality rating has a higher cost of bids relative to a vendor with a quality rating that is lower than the first quality rating.

44. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the at least one processor is configured to replace the number of bids the vendor receives for the time period with the remaining number of bids value such that the cost of bids for subsequent quote submissions by the vendor further reduce the number of remaining bids value for the vendor within the time period.

45. The apparatus of claim 38 wherein the at least one computer device is configured such that the cost of bids for submitting a quote is determined such that a vendor with a first quality rating has a lower cost of bids than a vendor with a quality rating that is lower than the first quality rating.