Method and System to Control Flow From Individual Nozzles While Controlling Overall System Flow And Pressure

• US 20100032492A1
• Filed: 07/31/2009
• Published: 02/11/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 08/01/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Capstan AG Systems, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Capstan AG Systems, Inc.
• Inventors: Dieball, Kent, Grimm, Jeff, Needham, Duane, Johnson, Tyron, Stone, Marvin
• Granted Patent: US 8,191,795 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 239/1
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 7/0089 Regulating or controlling systems the delivery being related to the movement of a vehicle B05B9/06

Abstract

A method and system has been developed to individually control the flow of liquid products from any nozzle within a plurality of nozzles using pulse width modulated solenoid actuated valves residing on a CAN communication network. The CAN communication network has been further developed to manage the high current requirements of the solenoid actuated valves, the large physical length and high number of nozzles used on modern agricultural application equipment and integration and retrofit requirements when used in conjunction with commercially available application rate control devices. The method and system simultaneously controls multiple flow and shutoff related inputs including but not limited to turn radius, nozzle overlap, swath reduction, nozzle spacing, fence row rates, wheel track rates, etc. The method and system will also simultaneously accept one or more external inputs from commercially available application rate control devices where other rate and shutoff inputs may be used, for example, variable rates per boom section based on GIS maps or multiple in-field sensors along the boom. The method and system further incorporates the artificial manipulation of commercial rate controller inputs and outputs to facilitate these individual nozzle control features and benefits without compromising the overall system flow control performed by the commercial rate controller.

Claims

1. A system for applying liquid agricultural products to a field comprising:

a plurality of individually controlled pulse width modulated valves that are configured to emit a liquid agricultural product at a rate based on volume per time;

a controller in communication with each of the valves, the controller being configured to receive multiple flow related individual control values for each valve, the controller being configured to multiply the individual control values together for each valve to create a multiplied value and to divide each resulting multiplied value by an average of all the multiplied values to create a flow factor for each valve; and

wherein the controller controls the rate at which the liquid agricultural product is emitted from each valve based on the calculated flow factor for each valve.

2. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the plurality of valves emit an overall application rate of the liquid agricultural product and wherein the controller is configured to vary the rate at which the liquid agricultural product is emitted from each valve based on changing flow factors without changing the overall application rate.

3. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the rate that the liquid agricultural product is emitted from each valve is based on a duty cycle percentage that is calculated by the controller, and wherein the controller is configured to receive a corporate duty cycle percentage, the controller being configured to calculate the duty cycle percentage for each valve by multiplying the corporate duty cycle percentage by the flow factor for each valve.

4. A system as defined in claim 3, wherein the controller is configured to close a valve that has a calculated duty cycle percentage of zero.

5. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to close a valve when any of the multiple individual control values for the valve are zero.

6. A system as defined in claim 4, wherein the controller is programmed with a pre-set minimum calculated duty cycle percentage, and wherein the controller is configured to assign the pre-set minimum calculated duty cycle percentage to a valve that has a calculated duty cycle percentage greater than zero and less than the pre-set minimum.

7. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to calculate the flow factor for each valve at least once a second.

8. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the valves are mounted on a boom that is configured to be traversed across a field by a vehicle.

9. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises a valve turn radius comprising a value based on a speed of each valve while the valve is traversing along an arc of a turn.

10. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the flow related individual control values for the valves comprise unitless values that are proportional to each other and are based upon the amount of liquid agricultural product that is emitted by each valve for a certain condition.

11. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values is based upon irregular valve spacing.

12. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises an increased or decreased application rate over wheel tracks produced by a vehicle that is used to traverse the valves over a field.

13. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises an increased or decreased application rate due to a field affect, the field affect comprising the presence of a fence row or an access road.

14. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises an increased or decreased application rate due to a vehicle affect, the vehicle affect comprising wheel tracks, dust generation, air disturbance, or mixtures thereof.

15. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises an increased or decreased application rate due to a vegetative affect, the vegetative affect comprising a crop or weed density, a crop or weed health, a crop or weed species, a crop or weed sex, or mixtures thereof.

16. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises a location of a valve on a global information system prescription map or on a field boundary map.

17. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein one of the flow related individual control values comprises a swath overlap.

18. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein the swath overlap values are calculated for each valve or for a group of valves from input received from a global positioning system.

19. A system as defined in claim 18, wherein the swath overlap values are further calculated based on a speed at which the valves are moving, a turn radius of the valves, and an antennae offset.

20. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein the controller is programmed with a memory map for determining valve locations, and wherein the controller uses a two-dimensional ring buffer method to allocate data memory storage locations such that valve position on the memory map is self-centering in X and Y directions.

21. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the flow related individual control values comprise at least one of a value related to soil fertility, soil conductivity, or valve pressure.

22. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein groups of the valves are given the same multiple individual control valves such that the groups are controlled together.

23. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller comprises a central hub and wherein all of the valves and inputs for the multiple flow related individual control values are in direct electrical communication with the controller.

24. A system as defined in claim 23, wherein the central hub includes battery power and a ground that is provided to each of the valves and inputs.

25. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller operates at a Baud rate of less than about 150,000 Bd.

26. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller includes a graphic display that allows an operator to input flow related individual control values.

27. A system as defined in claim 26, wherein the graphical display is configured to graphically illustrate each valve and the rate at which the liquid agricultural product is being emitted from the valve.

28. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller includes a subroutine that assigns physical locations to each valve to assist in assigning multiple flow related individual control values for the valves.

29. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein at least certain of the individually controlled pulse width modulated valves are used in conjunction with a non-pulsating valve.

30. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the controller includes a bypass system that bypasses all controls and operates any of the valves at a pre-set rate should an error be detected that is related to the valve.

31. A system as defined in claim 18, wherein the swath overlap values are further calculated from input received from an electronic compass.

32. A system as defined in claim 18, wherein the swath overlap values are determined by looking ahead along each predicted valve position, to the right of each predicted valve position, to the left of each predicted valve position, and behind each predicted valve position according to a user selected safety-margin distance.

33. A system as defined in claim 18, wherein a constant-curvature, constant-acceleration algorithm is used to predict valve position while traversing between global positioning system coordinates.

34. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein a first-order dynamic model that uses machine geometry is used to predict valve position for determining swath overlap.

35. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein false determination of swath overlap due to close proximity of adjacent nozzles is avoided by testing for adjacent nozzle overlap cases and ignoring those cases in determining swath overlap.

36. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein false determination of swath overlap due to small movement of valves along an application path is avoided by delaying a recording of previously treated regions until the valve has passed completely away from the region and only then storing the treated region information in the controller.

37. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein the controller is programmed with an overlap safety margin and wherein a swath overlap is calculated and compared to the overlap safety margin, the system further including a display that indicates that the calculated swath overlap is working within expected accuracy margins or that the calculated swath overlap is outside of expected accuracy margins.

38. A system as defined in claim 37, wherein the controller automatically adjusts the overlap safety margin relative to a predetermined overlap safety margin expectation.

39. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the system is retrofitted to a preexisting rate controller and wherein the system is configured to intercept and modify a signal from the preexisting rate controller in order to correct the signal for flow changes in the system that are not inputted into the preexisting controller.

40. A method for applying liquid agricultural products to a field comprising:

dispensing a liquid agricultural product through a plurality of individually controlled pulse width modulated valves, the liquid agricultural product being dispensed from each valve at a rate that is based upon a duty cycle percentage applied to the valve, the liquid agricultural product being dispensed onto a field at a total rate based on a corporate duty cycle percentage for all of the valves;

assigning multiple flow related individual control values for each valve, the flow related individual control values comprising unitless values that are assigned to each valve based upon a condition or parameter, the individual control values for each condition or parameter being proportional to each other;

multiplying the individual control values together for each valve to create a multiplied value and dividing each resulting multiplied value by an average of all the multiplied values to create a flow factor for each valve; and

setting the duty cycle percentage for each valve based upon multiplying the flow factor for each valve times the corporate duty cycle percentage.