SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AGGREGATING CONTENT ON A USER-CONTENT DRIVEN WEBSITE

• US 20100042615A1
• Filed: 08/12/2009
• Published: 02/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 08/12/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: WideAngle Technologies, Inc.
• Original Assignee: WideAngle Technologies, Inc.
• Inventors: Rinearson, Peter
• Application Number:
  US12/539,789
• Publication Number:
  US 20100042615A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: N/A
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation

Abstract

One or more items submitted by user-contributors of a website may be aggregated according to aggregation criteria. The aggregation criteria may specify a topic or type of item to be included in the aggregation. The aggregation criteria may be generated a priori by a user of the website and/or may be generated on-the-fly based on a search, inbound link, or the like. User contributed items may be associated with metadata and/or tags. The items and, importantly the metadata associated therewith, may be rated by users of the website. The item ratings, the metadata, and/or the metadata ratings may be used to aggregate relevant items, thereby increasing the probability that the aggregation closely matches the aggregation criteria. The aggregated items may be presented in a user interface to one or more users of the website.

Claims

1. A computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions to cause a computing device to perform a method for aggregating content, the method comprising:

receiving aggregation criteria;

selecting one or more items from a plurality of items, wherein each of the plurality of items is associated with metadata that describes the item, wherein an item is selected if one or more metadata items associated with the item conforms to the aggregation criteria and a rating of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfies a metadata rating threshold;

aggregating the selected items; and

providing a user interface configured to display the aggregated items.

2. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the ratings of the metadata items are user-submitted ratings.

3. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the metadata associated with the items comprise one or more metadata tags, and wherein the ratings of the one or more metadata tags are user-submitted relevancy ratings.

4. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the item is selected if one or more metadata items associated with the item conforms to the aggregation criteria, a rating of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfies a metadata rating threshold, and a rating of the item satisfies an item rating threshold.

5. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the item is selected if one or more metadata items associated with the item conforms to the aggregation criteria, a rating of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfies a metadata rating threshold, and a plurality of ratings of the item satisfy the rating threshold.

6. The computer-readable medium of claim 5, wherein each of the plurality of ratings of the item corresponds to a different rating category, and wherein each of the ratings is given a respective weight.

7. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of items is submitted by a user having a respective user profile, each user profile comprising a user rating derived from ratings of items submitted by the user, and

wherein the item is selected based on a user rating of the submitter of the item.

8. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein the item is selected if one or more of the metadata items associated with the item conform to the aggregation criteria and the item satisfies a user rating threshold.

9. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the aggregation criteria includes one or more keywords, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata includes one or more of the keywords.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the aggregation criteria includes a location identifier, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata identifies a location within a location proximity threshold of the location identifier.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the aggregation criteria includes a time identifier, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata identifies a time within a time proximity threshold of the time identifier.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the aggregation criteria identifies a location and a time, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata identifies a location and a time within respective location and time proximity thresholds of the location identifier and the time identifier.

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the aggregation criteria comprises a plurality of location identifiers, each location identifier associated with a respective time identifier, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata identifies one of the plurality of location identifiers within a location proximity threshold and one or more of the metadata items identifies a time within a time proximity threshold of the time identifier associated with the location identifier.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the plurality of location identifiers and associated time identifiers are determined from metadata associated with items submitted by one or more users.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the number of content items to be included in the arena is limited to an inclusion threshold, the method further comprising selecting an inclusion threshold number of items based on user-submitted ratings of the items.

16. A method for aggregating user-submitted items, the method comprising:

receiving ratings of a plurality of user-submitted items, wherein each item is associated with metadata to describe the item;

receiving user-submitted ratings of the metadata associated with each of the plurality of items;

receiving aggregation criteria;

aggregating one or more of the user-submitted items from the plurality of user-submitted items, wherein a user-submitted item is aggregated if one or more metadata items associated with the item conforms to the aggregation criteria and ratings of one or more of the conforming metadata items satisfy a metadata rating threshold; and

providing a user interface to display the aggregated items.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria is generated responsive to a user-submitted query.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria is generated responsive to an inbound link to a website.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria is generated based on metadata associated with one or more items submitted by a user.

20. The method of claim 16, wherein the metadata rating threshold comprises a requirement that a threshold number of users have submitted a rating of the one or more conforming metadata items.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein the item is submitted by a user having user rating derived from user-submitted ratings of items submitted by the user, and

wherein the item is aggregated if the user rating of the submitter of the item satisfies a submitter threshold even if the one or more conforming metadata items associated with the item do not satisfy the metadata rating threshold.

22. The method of claim 16, wherein the ratings of the metadata are user-submitted relevancy ratings.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria comprises one or more text tags, and wherein a metadata item conforms to the aggregation criteria if the metadata item includes a portion of one or more of the text tags.

24. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria identifies a location, and wherein a metadata item conforms to the aggregation criteria if metadata associated with the item identifies a location within a location proximity threshold of the identified location.

25. The method of claim 16, wherein the aggregation criteria identifies a location and an associated timeframe, and wherein an item is aggregated if metadata associated with the item identifies a location within a location proximity threshold of the identified location and the metadata associated with the item identifies a timeframe within a time proximity threshold of the timeframe associated with the identified location.

26. The method of claim 16, further comprising providing a user interface to display any selected one of the plurality of items to a user, wherein the user interface is configured to display the selected item with one or more metadata items associated with the item, and wherein the user interface includes one or more rating inputs configured to receive user-submitted ratings of the selected item and the one or more metadata items.

27. An apparatus for aggregating user-submitted items, comprising:

a computing device comprising a processor,

a computer-readable storage medium comprising a plurality of user-submitted items, wherein each of the items is associated with user-submitted metadata to describe the item;

a content management module communicatively coupled to the computer-readable storage medium and operable on the processor, wherein the content management module is to provide a user interface configured to display any selected one of the plurality of items, wherein the display includes one or more metadata items associated with the selected item, and wherein the display includes inputs configured to receive user-submitted ratings of the selected item and the one or more metadata items; and

a communication module operable on the processor and communicatively coupled to the computer-readable storage medium to receive user-submitted ratings of the items and to receive user-submitted ratings of metadata associated with the items;

wherein the content management module is configured to aggregate one or more of the user-submitted items based on aggregation criteria, wherein an item is aggregated if one or more metadata items associated with the item conforms to the aggregation criteria and the ratings of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfy a metadata rating threshold, and wherein the content management module is to provide for presenting the aggregated items in a user interface.

28. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the item is aggregated if one or more metadata items associated with the item conform to the aggregation criteria and relevancy ratings of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfy the metadata rating threshold.

29. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the item is aggregated if one or more of the metadata items associated with the item conform to the aggregation criteria, ratings of the one or more conforming metadata items satisfy the metadata rating threshold, and a rating of the item satisfies an item rating threshold.

30. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the aggregation criteria comprises a location identifier and a time identifier, and wherein the metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if one or more metadata items identifies a location within a location proximity threshold of the location identifier and one or more metadata items identifies a time within a time proximity threshold of the time identifier.

31. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the aggregation criteria comprises one or more text tags, and wherein metadata conforms to the aggregation criteria if one or more metadata items includes one or more of the text tags.