WIRELESS NETWORK TRANSITIONING FOR MOBILE DEVICES

• US 20100054210A1
• Filed: 09/02/2008
• Published: 03/04/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/02/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (Sony Group Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (Sony Group Corp.)
• Inventors: OSTERGREN, Mattias
• Application Number:
  US12/202,750
• Publication Number:
  US 20100054210A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/332
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 48/18 Selecting a network or a communication service

Abstract

A mobile device and method are provided for receiving a measured signal strength associated with a second network at a first point in time. The processor calculates a predicted signal strength associated with the second network at a second point in time based on the measured signal strength and makes a determination regarding whether the quality of the second network is good and a determination regarding whether the quality of the second network is bad based on the measured signal strength and the predicted signal strength. The processor determines whether to rove in or rove out of the second network based on the determination regarding whether the quality of the network is good and the determination regarding whether the quality of the network is bad.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

measuring a signal strength associated with a network at a first point in time;

calculating a predicted signal strength associated with the network at a second point in time based on the measurement;

determining whether a quality of the network is good based on the signal strength at the first point in time and the predicted signal strength at the second point in time;

determining whether the quality of the network is bad based on the signal strength at the first point in time and the predicted signal strength at the second point in time; and

determining whether to rove in or rove out of the network based on the determining whether the quality of the network is good and the determining whether the quality of the network is bad.

2. The method of claim 1, where the network is a wireless network.

3. The method of claim 2, where the wireless network is a wireless local area network (LAN).

4. The method of claim 1, where measuring a signal strength associated with a network at the first point in time, comprises:

measuring a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) associated with the network.

5. The method of claim 1, where calculating the predicted signal strength associated with the network at a second point in time, further comprises:

calculating the predicted signal strength based on the measured signal strength and a previously measured signal strength.

6. The method of claim 5, where the previously measured signal strength comprises a signal strength measured at a point in time preceding the first point in time.

7. The method of claim 6, where a time interval between the first point in time and the point in time preceding the first point in time is between 220 milliseconds (ms) and 1 second (s).

8. The method of claim 5, where the predicted signal strength is calculated by:

predicted signal strength=2*current signal strength−

previous signal strength,

where the current signal strength comprises the measured signal strength and the previous signal strength comprises the previously measured signal strength.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating an error margin associated with the predicted signal strength; and

determining whether the quality of the network is good is based on the measured signal strength, the predicted signal strength at the second point in time, and the error margin.

10. The method of claim 9, where calculating the error margin further comprises:

determining a highest signal strength in a predetermined number of previously measured signal strengths;

determining a lowest signal strength in a predetermined number of previously measured signal strengths; and

calculating the error margin based on a difference between the highest signal strength and the lowest signal strength.

11. The method of claim 10, where the predetermined number of previously measured signal strengths is four.

12. The method of claim 9, where determining whether the quality of the network is good further comprises:

determining whether the measured signal strength is greater than a first predetermined threshold;

determining whether the predicted signal strength is greater than the first predetermined threshold;

determining whether the calculated error margin is less than a second predetermined threshold;

determining that the quality of the network is good when the measured signal strength is greater than the first predetermined threshold, the predicted signal strength is greater than the first predetermined threshold, and the calculated error margin is less than the second predetermined threshold; and

determining that the quality of the network is not good when the measured signal strength is not greater than the first predetermined threshold, the predicted signal strength is not greater than the first predetermined threshold, or the calculated error margin is not less than the second predetermined threshold.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating a difference value based on the measured signal strength and a previously measured signal strength; and

determining whether the quality of the network is bad is based on the predicted signal strength at the second point in time, and the difference value.

14. The method of claim 13, where determining whether the quality of the network is bad further comprises:

determining whether the predicted signal strength is less than a third predetermined threshold;

determining whether the calculated difference value is less than a fourth predetermined threshold;

determining that the quality of the network is bad when the predicted signal strength is less than the third predetermined threshold, and the calculated difference value is less than the fourth predetermined threshold; and

determining that the quality of the network is not bad when the predicted signal strength is not less than the third predetermined threshold, or the calculated difference value is not less than the fourth predetermined threshold.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether a device is currently communicating via the network;

maintaining device communications via the network when it is determined to rove in and when the device is currently communicating via the network;

transitioning device communications to the network when it is determined to rove in and when the device is not currently communicating via the network;

maintaining device communications via a different network when it is determined to rove out and when the device is not currently communicating via the network; and

transitioning device communications to the different network when it is determined to rove out and when the device is currently communicating via the network.

16. The method of claim 15, where the network comprises a wireless local area network and where the different network comprises a cellular-based wireless network.

17. A mobile device, comprising:

a first wireless transceiver for communicating via a first network;

a second wireless transceiver for communicating via a second network;

sensor logic for measuring a signal strength associated with the second network; and

a processor configured to;

receive the measured signal strength associated with a second network at a first point in time;

calculate a predicted signal strength associated with the second network at a second point in time based on the measured signal strength;

determine whether a quality of the second network is good based on the measured signal strength and the predicted signal strength;

determine whether the quality of the second network is bad based on the measured signal strength and the predicted signal strength; and

determine whether to rove in or rove out of the second network based on the determination regarding whether the quality of the second network is good and the determination regarding whether the quality of the second network is bad.

18. The mobile device of claim 17, where the processor is further configured to:

determine whether the device is currently communicating via the second wireless transceiver or the first wireless transceiver;

maintain device communications via the second wireless transceiver when it is determined to rove in and when the device is currently communicating via the second wireless transceiver;

transition device communications from the first wireless transceiver to the second wireless transceiver when it is determined to rove in and when the device is currently communicating via the first wireless transceiver;

maintain device communications via the first wireless transceiver when it is determined to rove out and when the device is currently communicating via the first wireless transceiver; and

transition device communications to the first wireless transceiver when it is determined to rove out and when the device is currently communicating via the second wireless transceiver.

19. The mobile device of claim 17, where the processor is further configured to:

calculate an error margin associated with the predicted signal strength; and

determine whether the quality of the network is good is based on the measured signal strength, the predicted signal strength, and the error margin.

20. A computer-readable memory device including instructions for facilitating transition between a first network and a second network, the instructions comprising:

instructions for measuring a signal strength associated with the second network at a current point in time;

instructions for calculating a predicted signal strength associated with the second network at a second point in time based on the measurement;

instructions for determining whether a quality of the second network is good based on the measured signal strength at the current point in time and the predicted signal strength at the second point in time;

instructions for determining whether the quality of the second network is bad based on the measured signal strength at the current point in time and the predicted signal strength at the second point in time;

instructions for determining whether to communicate via the second network based on the determining whether the quality of the second network is good and the determining whether the quality of the second network is bad; and

transitioning communications into or out of the second network based the determination to communicate via the second network.