SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

• US 20100055658A1
• Filed: 03/13/2007
• Published: 03/04/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 02/26/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: 5 Dynamics, LLC
• Original Assignee: Spherical Dynamics Incorporated
• Inventors: Murphy, John, Wells, Melissa Meredith, Yokley, Edward M., Sturm, W. Michael, Holt, Bruce
• Application Number:
  US12/282,858
• Publication Number:
  US 20100055658A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/350
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

In systems, methods and program products relating to the assessment of individuals, a subject can be provided with an assessment through software and a computer for improved functionality. The software may be directly installed on the subject'"'"'s computer or may be on a remote server accessible through a communication network, such as a local network or the Internet. Stimuli to be presented to subject are selected in real time and may be selected randomly from a database of stimuli. Further, in the event of borderline cases, a refinement process may be used to provide an accurate assessment of the subject. Methods for the assessment of teams, comprising subject individuals, for the construction of ideal process profiles, and for coaching individuals are provided.

Claims

1. A system for conducting an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a server adapted to present to a subject at least one stimulus and to receive a response by said subject to each said stimulus presented, wherein said at least one stimulus is selected in real time and corresponds to a characteristic category; and

said server being further adapted to determine an assessment of said subject based on said responses;

wherein said assessment is determined based at least partly on elapsed time for said responses.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein said assessment is determined based on comparison of elapsed time for each response to a mean elapsed time for all responses from the subject.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein said server is adapted to assign a value to each response based on the elapsed time for that response.

4. The system according to claim 3, wherein said value is determined by applying a multiplier to a base value, the multiplier being dependent on the elapsed time.

5. The system according to claim 4, wherein said server is adapted to perform a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

6. The system according to claim 3, wherein said server is adapted to perform a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

7. The system according to claim 1, wherein said server is adapted to perform a statistical analysis on the elapsed times of the responses to determine the assessment.

8. The system according to claim 1, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

9. The system according to claim 1, further comprising:

a database of narratives corresponding to one or more assessments,

wherein said server is adapted to output a narrative from the database corresponding to the assessment determined.

10. A method of conducting an assessment of a subject, said method comprising:

a) presenting to a subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category;

c) repeating steps a) and b) as necessary with additional sets of stimuli; and

d) outputting an assessment of the subject based on said responses, wherein said assessment is determined based at least partly on elapsed time for said responses.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein said assessment is determined based on comparison of elapsed time for each response to a mean elapsed time for all responses from the subject.

12. The method according to claim 10, further comprising:

assigning a value to each response based on the elapsed time for that response.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein said value is determined by applying a multiplier to a base value, the multiplier being dependent on the elapsed time.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

16. The method according to claim 10, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the elapsed times of the responses to determine the assessment.

17. The method according to claim 10, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

18. The method according to claim 10, wherein the outputting an assessment comprises:

selecting a narrative from a database of narratives corresponding to the assessment determined; and

outputting the selected narrative.

19. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

a) presenting to a subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category;

c) repeating steps a) and b) as necessary with additional sets of stimuli; and

d) outputting an assessment of the subject based on said responses, wherein said assessment is determined based at least partly on elapsed time for said responses.

20. The program product according to claim 19, wherein said assessment is determined based on comparison of elapsed time for each response to a mean elapsed time for all responses from the subject.

21. The program product according to claim 19, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method step:

assigning a value to each response based on the elapsed time for that response.

22. The program product according to claim 21, wherein said value is determined by applying a multiplier to a base value, the multiplier being dependent on the elapsed time.

23. The program product according to claim 22, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

24. The program product according to claim 21, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the values of the responses to determine the assessment.

25. The program product according to claim 19, wherein the assessment is determined by performing a statistical analysis on the elapsed times of the responses to determine the assessment.

26. The program product according to claim 19, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

27. The program product according to claim 19, wherein the machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the outputting an assessment comprises machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following steps:

selecting a narrative from a database of narratives corresponding to the assessment determined; and

outputting the selected narrative.

28. A system for conducting a relationship assessment of two or more subjects, comprising:

a server adapted to present to each subject at least one stimulus and to receive a response by each subject to each stimulus presented, wherein said at least one stimulus is selected in real time and corresponds to a characteristic category, said server being further adapted to determine a characteristic category assessment of each subject based on said responses for one or more characteristic categories; and

a database of dyads, each dyad based on a characteristic category assessment of each subject and corresponding to a relationship assessment of a relationship between the subjects.

29. The system according to claim 28, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

30. The system according to claim 28, wherein the database of dyads includes narratives corresponding to one or more relationship assessments, and

wherein said server is adapted to output a narrative from the database corresponding to the relationship assessment.

31. The system according to claim 28, wherein each dyad includes a characteristic category assessment for at least one of the following characteristic categories:

strategize, motivate, analyze and activate.

32. A method of conducting a relationship assessment of two or more subjects, said method comprising:

a) presenting to a subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category;

c) repeating steps a) and b) as necessary with additional sets of stimuli;

d) determining a characteristic category assessment of the subject based on said responses for one or more characteristic categories;

e) repeating steps a)-d) for each remaining subject; and

f) outputting a relationship assessment of a relationship between the subjects based on the characteristic category assessments determined for each subject.

33. The method according to claim 32, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

34. The method according to claim 32, wherein the outputting a relationship assessment comprises:

selecting a dyad from a database of dyads including narratives corresponding to one or more relationship assessments, and

outputting a narrative from the database corresponding to the relationship assessment.

35. The method according to claim 34, wherein each dyad includes a characteristic category assessment for at least one of the following characteristic categories:

strategize, motivate, analyze and activate.

36. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

a) presenting to a subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category;

c) repeating steps a) and b) as necessary with additional sets of stimuli;

d) determining a characteristic category assessment of the subject based on said responses for one or more characteristic categories;

e) repeating steps a)-d) for each remaining subject; and

f) outputting a relationship assessment of a relationship between the subjects based on the characteristic category assessments determined for each subject.

37. The program product according to claim 36, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

38. The program product according to claim 36, wherein the machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the outputting a relationship assessment comprises machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

selecting a dyad from a database of dyads including narratives corresponding to one or more relationship assessments, and

outputting a narrative from the database corresponding to the relationship assessment.

39. The program product according to claim 36, wherein each dyad includes a characteristic category assessment for at least one of the following characteristic categories:

strategize, motivate, analyze and activate.

40. A method of conducting an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a) presenting to said subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories; and

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category.

41. The method according to claim 40, wherein three or more stimuli are presented in step a).

42. The method according to claim 40, wherein four or more stimuli are presented in step a).

43. The method according to claim 40, wherein more than four stimuli are presented in step a).

44. The method according to claim 40, further comprising

presenting four stimuli in step a), wherein each said different characteristic category corresponds to a different phase in a success/satisfaction cycle.

45. The method according to claim 40, further comprising

presenting an inquiry to said subject in step a), and receiving a selection by said subject in response to said inquiry in step b).

46. The method according to claim 40, further comprising:

c) presenting to said subject a second set of two or more stimuli corresponding to characteristic categories different from said first characteristic category; and

d) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said second set of two or more stimuli corresponding to a second characteristic category.

47. The method according to claim 46, further comprising:

e) presenting to said subject a third set of two or more stimuli corresponding to characteristic categories different from said first and second characteristic categories; and

f) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said third set of two or more stimuli corresponding to a third characteristic category.

48. The method of claim 47, further comprising

obtaining an order of selection of said characteristic categories.

49. The method according to claim 48, further comprising

repeating steps a) to f) with additional sets of stimuli.

50. The method according to claim 40, wherein said receiving further comprises a response time criterion.

51. The method according to claim 50, wherein said response time criterion is in the range 1-45 seconds.

52. The method according to claim 40, wherein step a) to b) further comprise communication with said subject through a network.

53. The method according to claim 52, wherein said network is the Internet.

54. The method according to claim 40, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

55. A method of conducting an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a) presenting to said subject two to four stimuli and an inquiry, wherein each stimulus corresponds to a phase in a success/satisfaction cycle;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli in response to said inquiry; and

c) repeating steps a) and b) until an order of selection of each said phase is determined.

56. The method of claim 55, further comprising:

d) processing said order of selection to determine an assessment of said subject.

57. The method according to claim 55, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

58. The method according to claim 55, wherein said receiving further comprises a response time criterion.

59. The method according to claim 58, wherein said response time criterion is in the range 1-45 seconds.

60. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

a) presenting to said subject a first set of two or more stimuli, wherein at least two of said stimuli correspond to different characteristic categories; and

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli corresponding to a first characteristic category.

61. The program product according to claim 60, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to present four stimuli in step a), wherein each said different characteristic category corresponds to a different phase in a success/satisfaction cycle.

62. The program product according to claim 60, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to present an inquiry to said subject in step a), and receive a selection by said subject in response to said inquiry in step b).

63. The program product according to claim 60, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

c) presenting to said subject a second set of two or more stimuli corresponding to characteristic categories different from said first characteristic category; and

d) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said second set of two or more stimuli corresponding to a second characteristic category.

64. The program product according to claim 63, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

e) presenting to said subject a third set of two or more stimuli corresponding to characteristic categories different from said first and second characteristic categories; and

f) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said third set of two or more stimuli corresponding to a third characteristic category.

65. The program product according to claim 64, further comprising machine readable program code causing a machine to obtain an order of selection of said characteristic categories.

66. The program product according to claim 65, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to repeat steps a) to f) with additional sets of stimuli.

67. The program product according to claim 60, wherein step a) to b) further comprise communication with said subject through a network.

68. The program product according to claim 67, wherein said network is the Internet.

69. The program product according to claim 60, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

70. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

a) presenting to said subject two to four stimuli and an inquiry, wherein each stimulus corresponds to a phase in a success/satisfaction cycle;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli in response to said inquiry; and

c) repeating steps a) and b) until an order of selection of each said phase is determined.

71. The program product of claim 70, further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method step:

d) processing said order of selection to determine an assessment of said subject.

72. The program product according to claim 70, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

73. A system for conducting an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a server adapted to present two or more stimuli to said subject on a computer, each said stimulus corresponding to a different characteristic category;

said server being further adapted to receive a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli.

74. The system according to claim 73, wherein each stimulus comprises a word-pair.

75. A computer-implemented method of evaluating an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a) presenting to said subject at least one stimulus, wherein said at least one stimulus is selected in real time and corresponds to a characteristic category; and

b) evaluating said assessment of said subject based on a response received from said subject to each said stimulus presented.

76. The method according to claim 75, wherein step a) further comprises randomly selecting said at least one stimulus from a database of stimuli.

77. The method according to claim 75, wherein said stimulus is a word-pair.

78. The method according to claim 75, wherein step a) further comprises formulating an entire assessment by selecting a plurality of stimuli.

79. The method according to claim 78, wherein said plurality of stimuli comprise at least one stimulus corresponding to each of a plurality of different said characteristic categories.

80. The method according to claim 75, further comprising:

c) determining whether said assessment evaluated in step b) requires refinement between two or more said characteristic categories.

81. The method according to claim 80, further comprising:

d) presenting an additional stimulus corresponding to each of said two or more said characteristic categories.

82. The method according to claim 81, further comprising:

e) repeating steps b) to d) until a desired level of refinement is achieved.

83. The method according to claim 80, further comprising:

d) presenting to said subject two or more stimuli, wherein each stimulus corresponds to a different said characteristic category;

e) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli; and

f) repeating steps d) and e) to obtain an order of selection of each said different characteristic categories.

84. The method according to claim 83, further comprising:

g) repeating steps c) to f) until a desired level of refinement is achieved.

85. The method according to claim 75, wherein said response received from said subject further comprises a response time criterion.

86. The method according to claim 85, wherein said response time criterion is in the range 1-45 seconds.

87. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to perform the following method steps:

a) presenting, when an assessment of a subject requires refinement between two or more characteristic categories of the assessment, to a subject a first set of three or more stimuli, wherein each stimulus in said first set of three or more stimuli corresponds to a different characteristic category;

b) receiving a selection by said subject of one of said stimuli;

c) presenting to said subject a second set of two or more stimuli, wherein each stimulus of said second set of two or more stimuli corresponds to a different characteristic category; and

d) repeating steps b) and c) to obtain an order of selection of each of the different characteristic categories.

88. A method of conducting an assessment of a team comprised of members, said method comprising:

a) providing the process maps of said members of said team;

b) overlaying said process maps of said members of said team; and

c) assessing said team by providing a process map comprising said overlaid process maps of said members of said team.

89. The method of claim 88, further comprising constructing a process map of a virtual member of said team, said method comprising:

d) identifying deficiencies or excesses in each characteristic category of said team assessment; and

e) constructing said process map of said virtual member of said team by ascribing to each said characteristic category of said process map of said virtual member of said team a value which compensates for said deficiencies or excesses of said overlaid process maps of said members of said team.

90. The method of claim 89 wherein said virtual member of said team fulfills a specific role or relationship within the team.

91. The method of claim 90, further comprising identifying candidate team members, said method comprising:

f) comparing said process map of said virtual member of said team with a plurality of stored assessment data obtained for candidate team members;

g) identifying a match between said virtual team member process map with said stored assessment data; and

h) identifying the candidate team member associated with said stored assessment data.

92. A system for conducting an assessment of a subject, comprising:

a server adapted to present to a subject at least one stimulus and to receive a response by said subject to each said stimulus presented, wherein said at least one stimulus is selected in real time and corresponds to a characteristic category; and

said server being further adapted to determine an assessment of said subject based on said responses.

93. The system according to claim 92, wherein said server is further adapted to determine whether said assessment requires refinement between two or more of said characteristic categories, and wherein said server is further adapted to present, when said refinement is required, an additional stimulus corresponding to each of said two or more said characteristic categories.

94. A method for coaching a client by a coach, comprising:

a) evaluating a client current process map to provide a client evaluation; and

b) reciting said client evaluation to said client.

95. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

comparing said client current process map and a coach process map to provide a coach/client evaluation to determine how said client and said coach would naturally prefer to work together.

96. The method according to claim 95, further comprising

reciting to said client said coach/client evaluation.

97. The method according to claim 95, further comprising

reciting to said client changes in the behavior of said client and said coach to improve a coach/client relationship.

98. The method according to claim 95, further comprising

reciting to said client the learning report of said client and the teaching report of said coach.

99. The method according to claim 98, further comprising

reciting to said client changes in said learning style of said client and said teaching style of said coach to achieve more efficient task completion of said client.

100. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

comparing said client current process map and a client aspiration map to provide an ideal client evaluation.

101. The method according to claim 100, further comprising

reciting to said client said ideal client evaluation.

102. The method according to claim 100, further comprising

reciting to said client changes to the behavior of said client to minimize the difference between said client current process map and said client ideal process map.

103. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

comparing said client current process map and a colleague process map to provide a colleague/client evaluation to determine how said client and said colleague prefer to work as a team.

104. The method according to claim 103, further comprising

reciting to said client said colleague/client evaluation.

105. The method according to claim 103, further comprising

reciting to said client changes in the behavior of said client and said colleague to increase success and satisfaction in the fulfillment of a task by said client and said colleague.

106. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

comparing said client current process map and a task/project process map to provide a task/client evaluation.

107. The method according to claim 106, further comprising

reciting to said client said task/client evaluation.

108. The method according to claim 106, further comprising

reciting to said client changes to the behavior of said client to minimize the difference in energy levels between said client current process map and said task/project process map.

109. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

reciting to said client the working preferences of said client.

110. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

reciting to said client the learning preferences of said client.

111. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

visualization of how said client prefers to spend time on a task.

112. The method according to claim 94, further comprising

visualization of how said client prefers to spend focused energy on a task.

113. The method according to claim 95, further comprising

incorporating said client evaluation and said coach/client evaluation within an archive database.

114. The method according to claim 113, further comprising

annotating responses of said coach and said client within an archive database.

115. The method according to claim 113, further comprising

receiving editing feedback by the client prior to entry of said client evaluation into said archive database.

116. The method according to claim 113, further comprising

reviewing said archive database by said coach and said client to identify success and failure in a coach-client relationship.

117. The method according to claim 115, further comprising

repeating steps a) and b) and comparing said client evaluation with said client evaluation within said archive database to provide an updated client evaluation.

118. A program product, comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to evaluate a client current process map to provide a client evaluation.

119. The program product according to claim 118,

further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to compare said client current process map and a coach process map to provide a coach/client evaluation.

120. The program product according to claim 118,

further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to compare said client current process map and a client aspiration map to provide an ideal client evaluation.

121. The program product according to claim 118,

further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to compare said client current process map and a colleague process map to provide a colleague/client evaluation.

122. The program product according to claim 118,

further comprising machine readable program code for causing a machine to compare said client current process map and a task/project process map to provide a task/client evaluation.