EEG-Related Methods

• US 20100069775A1
• Filed: 08/03/2009
• Published: 03/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 11/13/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Alex Imas, Michael Milgramm
• Original Assignee: Alex Imas, Michael Milgramm
• Inventors: Imas, Alex, Milgramm, Michael
• Application Number:
  US12/462,439
• Publication Number:
  US 20100069775A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/544
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/16 Devices for psychotechnics using teaching or educational appliances G09B1/00 - G09B7/00; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/374 Detecting the frequency distribution of signals, e.g. detecting delta, theta, alpha, beta or gamma waves
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/377 using evoked responses
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/6814 Head
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/7257 using Fourier transforms

Abstract

This invention provides an EEG-based methods of determining whether a test subject is a specific individual, has a sufficiently positive attitude or is sufficiently alert to perform a pre-defined task.

Claims

1. A method of determining whether a test subject is a specific individual comprising:

a) recording a first electroencephalograph (EEG) over a first period of time from the specific individual;

b) exposing the specific individual during the first period of time to a first series of sensory stimuli comprising at least one sensory stimulus familiar to the specific individual and at least four sensory stimuli not familiar to the specific individual, wherein all the sensory stimuli are of the same modality, and quantitating the amplitude of a P300 waveform evoked by the at least one sensory familiar stimulus in the first EEG;

c) recording a second EEG over a second period of time from the test subject;

d) exposing the test subject during the second period of time to a second series of sensory stimuli comprising the at least one sensory stimulus familiar to the specific individual and to at least four sensory stimuli not familiar to the specific individual, wherein all the sensory stimuli are of the same modality;

g) determining from the EEG whether the sensory stimulus familiar to the specific individual evokes a P300 waveform in the test subject and quantitating the amplitude of the P300 waveform so evoked in the second EEG; and

h) comparing the amplitude of the P300 waveform quantitated in step e) with the amplitude of the P300 waveform quantitated in step b),

wherein a P300 waveform quantitated in step e) of greater amplitude than the amplitude of the P300 waveform quantitated in step b) indicates that the test subject is the specific individual, and wherein the failure of the sensory stimulus familiar to the specific individual to evoke a P300 waveform or a P300 waveform quantitated in step e) of the same or lower amplitude than the amplitude of the P300 waveform quantitated in step b) indicates that the test subject is not the specific individual.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the P300 waveforms are quantitated using an algorithm.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the EEG is denoised prior to quantitating the amplitude of the P300 waveforms in step b) and in step e).

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the test subject is exposed to at least twenty sensory stimuli and wherein the ratio of (a) stimuli not familiar to the specific individual to (b) stimuli familiar to the specific individual to is at least 4:

1.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the test subject is exposed to no more than thirty sensory stimuli.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second EEGs are each recorded using at least two active electrodes each comprising an Ag-AgCl recording tip.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein one electrode records from a Pz site on the test subject'"'"'s head.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the EEG is recorded using at least four electrodes, with three recording from the Pz site on the test subject'"'"'s head and one recording from a mastoid area of the test subject'"'"'s head.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensory stimuli are visual images.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the sensory stimulus familiar to the specific individual is previously provided by the specific individual.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensory stimuli are auditory.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising correcting the first and second EEG for test subject'"'"'s eye blinks before step f).

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first and second EEGs are corrected for test subject'"'"'s eye blinks as measured by a fiber-optic eye blink detector.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the test subject is not elicited to provide a continuous account of their thoughts during step d).

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the amplitude of the P300 is quantitiated by measuring the DX value.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the test subject is informed prior to step c) that if he or she pays attention to the stimuli he or she is more likely to be identified as the specific individual.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein each EEG recording is sequentially (a) amplified;

(b) filtered through a 30 Hz low pass filter and a 0.3 Hz high pass filter;

(c) converted from analog to digital;

(d) subjected to a fast fourier transform.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the amplitude of the P300 is determined as the average of at least 20 quantified P300 waveforms.

2. A method of determining whether a test subject possesses a sufficiently positive attitude to perform a predefined task with a second subject who is known to the test subject comprising:

a) determining from a first electroencephalograph (EEG) of the test subject recorded over a first period of time if the subject is alert enough to proceed to step b) of the method, and if so, proceeding to step b);

b) recording a second EEG over a second period of time from the test subject wherein the second EEG is recorded using a bilateral electrode with one pole of the bilateral electrode positioned over the left cerebral hemisphere (LCH) of the test subjects'"'"' brain and with another pole of the bilateral electrode positioned over the right cerebral hemisphere (RCH) of the test subjects'"'"' brain;

c) exposing the specific individual during the second period of time to a first series of visual images, the first series comprising at least one image of the face of the second subject and at least four images not of the face of the second subject, and quantitating (a) the amplitude of a P300 waveform evoked by the image of the face of the second subject and (b) the level of alpha and beta wave activity in the test subject during the second period of time;

d) determining from the amplitude of the P300 waveform if the second subject is known to the test subject;

e) recording a third EEG over a third period of time from the test subject;

f) exposing the test subject during the third period of time to a second series of visual images which images are predetermined not to evoke a P300 response in a population of test subjects and quantitating the level of alpha and beta wave activity in the test subject during the third period of time so as to determine baseline line alpha and beta wave activity;

g) subtracting the baseline alpha and beta wave activity quantitated in step f) from the alpha and beta wave activity, respectively, quantitated in step c) so as to produce corrected alpha and beta activity levels;

h) determining the ratio of corrected alpha wave activity to corrected beta wave activity,

i) determining if the ratio of corrected alpha wave activity to corrected beta wave activity is higher in the LCH of the test subject or the RCH of the test subject,

wherein a higher alpha/beta ratio in the RCH indicates that the test subject has a sufficiently positive attitude to perform the predefined task with the second subject, and wherein a higher alpha/beta ratio in the LCH indicates that the test subject does not have a sufficiently positive attitude to perform the predefined task with the second subject.

3. A method of determining whether a test subject is sufficiently alert to perform a predefined task comprising:

a) recording an electroencephalograph (EEG) over a period of time from the test subject using an EEG recording apparatus;

b) analyzing the frequency distribution of the wavebands recorded in the EEG; and

c) quantitating any ERN waveform in the EEG,

wherein presence in the EEG of both (1) (a) an alpha waveband power component ratio of 0.5-1.0 and a theta waveband power component ratio of less than 0.5 or (b) a theta waveband power ratio of 0.5-1.0 and an alpha waveband power component ratio of less than 0.5; and

(2) one or more ERN waveforms recorded during the period of time indicates that the test subject is not sufficiently alert to perform the predefined task, and wherein the presence of (1) but not (2), or (2) but not (1), indicates that the test subject is sufficiently alert to perform a predefined task.