METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRACKING AND ANALYZING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PRODUCING PAPER

• US 20100100403A1
• Filed: 10/20/2008
• Published: 04/22/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 10/20/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Green Blue Institute
• Original Assignee: Metafore
• Inventors: Pollock, Thomas E., Jourdan, Theron M.
• Application Number:
  US12/254,511
• Publication Number:
  US 20100100403A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06393 Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06395 Quality analysis or management

Abstract

A system and methods are disclosed for enabling a purchaser to make informed, customized purchasing decisions about a plurality of suppliers based on environmental impact data entered by the suppliers. The system enables a supplier to input data about the environmental impact of production process. The system enables the supplier to grant access permission to the input data to one or more purchasers. The system applies a normalization curve to normalize the data. The system also enables the supplier to identify up-stream production entities. The system enables the up-stream production entities to anonymously input environmental impact data. A purchaser enters a plurality of weight values indicating the relative importance of the environmental impact factors. Based on the inputted data by the suppliers and the up-stream production entities, and based on the weight values, the system provides at least one customized supplier environmental impact score to the purchaser.

Claims

1. A method of quantifying an environmental impact of a supplier, the method comprising:

(a) enabling a supplier to input first environmental data for a first environmental impact category, second environmental impact data for a second environmental impact category, and associated permission data granting permission to at least one potential purchaser;

(b) enabling the supplier to indicate an up-stream entity;

(c) enabling the up-stream entity to input up-stream environmental data;

(d) generating a normalized data set for the supplier based on at least one normalization curve, the first environmental data, and the second environmental data;

(e) generating a normalized up-stream data set for the supplier, the normalized up-stream data set being based on the up-stream environmental data;

(f) enabling the potential purchaser to indicate a first relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a second relative weight for the second environmental impact category; and

(g) if the associated permission data for the supplier grants permission to the potential purchaser;

(i) calculating a supplier outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized data set,

(ii) calculating an up-stream outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized up-stream data set,

(iii) displaying the supplier outcome score, and

(iv) displaying the up-stream outcome score.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the supplier is a first supplier, the supplier outcome score is a first supplier outcome score, and the upstream outcome score is a first upstream outcome score, and which also includes calculating a second supplier outcome score and a second upstream outcome score for a second supplier.

3. The method of claim 2, which includes determining a preferred supplier between the first supplier and the second supplier, the determination being based on at least one selected from the group consisting of a comparison between the first supplier outcome score and the second outcome score and a comparison between the first up-stream outcome score and the second up-stream outcome score.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the up-stream environmental data is associated with either the first environmental impact category or the second environmental impact category.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein enabling the potential purchaser to indicate the first relative weight includes enabling the potential purchaser to provide an input to move a displayed slider.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein enabling the potential purchaser to indicate the first relative weight includes enabling the potential purchaser to provide an input representing a numeral indicative of the first relative weight.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein a sum of the first relative weight and the second relative weight is equal to a predetermined total quantity of points.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating the outcome score is also based on a credit attributable to the supplier.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the credit is based on a technological asset owned by the supplier.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the technological asset is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

a pollution reduction device, a factory, and a production machine.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the credit is based on information provided by the potential purchaser.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the information provided by the potential purchaser represents an assignment of value by the potential purchaser to an activity of the supplier.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the credit is based on a report generated by a third party about a manufacturing capability of the supplier.

14. The method of claim 1, which includes storing the first relative weight and the second relative weight as a first weight set, which includes enabling potential purchaser to indicate a third relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a fourth relative weight for the second environmental impact category, and which includes storing the third relative weight and the fourth relative weight as a second weight set.

15. The method of claim 14, which includes enabling the potential purchaser to indicate one of the first weight set and the second weight set and which further includes calculating the outcome score based on the indicated weight set.

16. A method of quantifying an environmental impact of a supplier, the method comprising:

(a) enabling a supplier to input first environmental data for a first environmental impact category, a second environmental impact data for a second environmental impact category, and associated permission data granting permission to at least one potential purchaser;

(b) enabling the supplier to indicate an up-stream entity;

(c) enabling the up-stream entity to input up-stream environmental data;

(d) generating a normalized data set for the supplier, the normalized data set being based on the first environmental data, the second environmental data, and the up-stream environmental data;

(e) enabling the potential purchaser to indicate a first relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a second relative weight for the second environmental impact category; and

(f) if the permission data associated with the supplier grants permission to the potential purchaser;

(i) calculating an outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized data set, and

(ii) displaying the outcome score.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the up-stream environmental data is associated with either the first environmental impact category or the second environmental impact category.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein generating the normalized data set for the supplier includes applying an industry average to the first environmental data, the second environmental data, and the up-stream environmental data.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein generating a normalized data set for the supplier includes attributing a portion of the first environmental data, the second environmental data, or the up-stream environmental data to a product to be purchased.

20. The method of claim 16, wherein generating a normalized data set for the supplier includes applying at least one normalization curve to at least one selected from the group consisting of the first environmental data, the second environmental data, and the up-stream environmental data.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein enabling the potential purchaser to indicate the first relative weight includes enabling the potential purchaser to provide an input to slide a slider input.

22. The method of claim 16, wherein enabling the potential purchaser to indicate the first relative weight includes enabling the potential purchaser to input a numeral representing the first relative weight.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein a sum of the first relative weight and the second relative weight is equal to a total quantity of points.

24. The method of claim 16, wherein calculating the outcome score is additionally based on a credit attributable to the supplier.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the credit is based on a technological asset owned by the supplier.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the technological asset is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

a pollution reduction device, a factory, and a production machine.

27. The method of claim 25, wherein the credit is applied based on a credit input provided by the potential purchaser.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the credit input represents an assignment of value by the potential purchaser to an activity of the supplier.

29. The method of claim 24, wherein the credit is based on at least one report generated by a third party about a manufacturing capability of the supplier.

30. The method of claim 16, which includes storing the first relative weight and the second relative weight as a first weight set, which includes enabling potential purchaser to indicate a third relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a fourth relative weight for the second environmental impact category, and which includes storing the third relative weight and the fourth relative weight as a second weight set.

31. The method of claim 16, which includes enabling the potential purchaser to indicate one of the first weight set and the second weight set, and which includes calculating the outcome score based on the indicated weight set.

32. The method of claim 16, wherein the potential purchaser is a first potential purchaser, and wherein the supplier is a second potential purchaser.

33. An environmental impact determination system comprising:

at least one network interface device;

at least one processor; and

at least one memory device which stores a plurality of instructions, which when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to operate with the at least one network interface device to;

(a) enable a supplier to input first environmental data for a first environmental impact category, second environmental impact data for a second environmental impact category, and associated permission data granting permission to at least one potential purchaser,

(b) enable an up-stream entity to input up-stream environmental data,

(c) generate a normalized data set for the supplier based on at least one normalization curve, the first environmental data, and the second environmental data,

(d) generate a normalized up-stream data set for the supplier, the normalized up-stream data set being based on the up-stream environmental data,

(e) enable the potential purchaser to indicate a first relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a second relative weight for the second environmental impact category, and

(f) if the associated permission data for the supplier grants permission to the potential purchaser;

(i) calculate a supplier outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized data set,

(ii) calculate an up-stream outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized up-stream data set,

(iii) display the supplier outcome score, and

(iv) display the up-stream outcome score.

34. The environmental impact determination system of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the at least one processor to calculate the outcome score based on a credit attributable to the supplier.

35. The environmental impact determination system of claim 34, wherein the credit is based on information provided by the potential purchaser.

36. The environmental impact determination system of claim 35, wherein the information provided by the potential purchaser represents an assignment of value by the potential purchaser to an activity of the supplier.

37. The environmental impact determination system of claim 34, wherein the credit is based on a report generated by a third party about a manufacturing capability of the supplier.

38. An environmental impact determination system comprising:

at least one network interface device;

at least one processor; and

at least one memory device which stores a plurality of instructions, which when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to operate with the at least one network interface device to

(a) enable a supplier to input first environmental data for a first environmental impact category, a second environmental impact data for a second environmental impact category, and associated permission data granting permission to at least one potential purchaser;

(b) enable the supplier to indicate an up-stream entity;

(c) enable the up-stream entity to input up-stream environmental data;

(d) generate a normalized data set for the supplier, the normalized data set being based on the first environmental data, the second environmental data, and the up-stream environmental data;

(e) enable the potential purchaser to indicate a first relative weight for the first environmental impact category and a second relative weight for the second environmental impact category; and

(f) if the permission data associated with the supplier grants permission to the potential purchaser;

(i) calculate an outcome score based on the first relative weight, the second relative weight, and the normalized data set, and

(ii) display the outcome score.

39. The environmental impact determination system of claim 38, wherein generating a normalized data set for the supplier includes attributing a portion of the first environmental data, the second environmental data, or the up-stream environmental data to a product to be purchased.

40. The environmental impact determination system of claim 38, wherein the instructions cause the at least one processor to generate the normalized data set for the supplier by applying at least one normalization curve to at least one selected from the group consisting of the first environmental data, the second environmental data, and the up-stream environmental data.

41. The environmental impact determination system of claim 38, wherein the instructions cause the at least one processor to calculate the outcome score based on a credit attributable to the supplier.

42. The environmental impact determination system of claim 41, wherein the credit is based on a credit input provided by the potential purchaser.

43. The environmental impact determination system of claim 42, wherein the credit input represents an assignment of value by the potential purchaser to an activity of the supplier.