SYSTEMS, APPARATUS AND PROCESSES FOR AUTOMATED BLOOD FLOW ASSESSMENT OF VASCULATURE

• US 20100130878A1
• Filed: 11/24/2008
• Published: 05/27/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 11/24/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Lasso, Andras, Nasztanovics, Ferenc
• Application Number:
  US12/276,483
• Publication Number:
  US 20100130878A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/500
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/026 Measuring blood flow A61B3/1233, A61B3/1241 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/10081 Computed x-ray tomography [CT]
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/10088 Magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/20104 Interactive definition of region of interest [ROI]
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/30104 Vascular flow; Blood flow; Perfusion
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 7/0012 Biomedical image inspection
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/50 for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/60 relating to pathologies
• CPC Class Codes: G16Z 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass

Abstract

A system, apparatus and process for characterizing aspects of vascular scenarios is described, and includes an input module and a database. The system also includes access to a FSI solver. The FSI solver accepts information from the input module and the database, and uses the accepted information to model a vascular site of interest and provide results from modeling the vascular site of interest. The system also includes interfaces for transmitting information from the input module and the database to the FSI solver and for receiving the results from the FSI solver, and an ensemble of analysis modules which is coupled to the interface for receiving results. The ensemble of analysis modules compares various treatment options, allows before-and-after comparisons of aspects of the vascular site of interest and provides quantitative assessments of parameters of interest describing the vascular site of interest.

Claims

1. A system for characterizing aspects of vascular scenarios, comprising:

an input module;

a database for storing characteristics of various types and conditions of vascular segments, a vascular region of interest and associated environments, properties of tools associated with treatment of vascular abnormalities, and patient-related indicia, or information identifying such;

access to a FSI solver, the FSI solver for accepting an ensemble including at least some of the characteristics, conditions, a description of the vascular region of interest and associated environments, the properties of tools associated with treatment of vascular abnormalities, and the patient-related indicia, or information identifying such from the input module and the database, and using the accepted ensemble to model the region of interest and provide results from modeling the region of interest;

interfaces for transmitting information from the input module and the database to the FSI solver and for receiving the results from the FSI solver; and

a collection of analysis modules, coupled to the interface for receiving results, the collection for comparing various treatment options, allowing before-and-after comparisons of aspects of the region of interest and providing quantitative assessments of parameters of interest describing the region of interest from the results.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the access to the FSI solver is via a bus, which fulfills, at least in part, the functions of the interfaces for transmitting and for receiving, and wherein the FSI solver is a part of the system.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the access to the FSI solver is via a network, which fulfills, at least in part, the functions of the interfaces for transmitting and for receiving, and wherein the FSI solver is remote from other portions of the system.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the FSI solver is operable to iteratively perform a computational fluid dynamic analysis of pulsatile fluid flow, and, with results from the fluid analysis, employ a finite-element mechanical analysis of vessel properties including deformation due to the pulsatile loading by the fluid, and then, using the results from the finite-element mechanical analysis, re-engage the computational fluid dynamic analysis of pulsatile fluid flow, followed by further finite element mechanical analysis of vessel properties, until a predetermined convergence criterion is achieved, and then to provide raw simulation data from the iteratively-performed analyses to other analysis modules for further, application-specific processing.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein results from the FSI solver are employed in a pre-operative, characterization phase, to compare benefits and drawbacks of various treatment protocols and tools and aid in selection of an appropriate one or ones of treatment modalities for implementation or further evaluation.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein results from the FSI solver are employed in a intra-operative mode, to compare present status to a planned-for result, and to determine from that comparison what actions, if any, are suggested.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein results from the FSI solver are employed in a post-operative mode, to facilitate comparison of a present risk profile to a planned result and associated risk profile, and to determine from that comparison what actions, if any, are suggested.

8. A process for characterizing aspects of vascular scenarios, comprising acts of:

accepting patient indicia via an input module;

accessing relevant data records from a database using the indicia, and augmenting those data records, where needed, with stored data from a bank of representative data also stored in the database, to provide information including a description of the vascular scenario and defining a region of interest;

sending the information to a FSI solver;

receiving, responsive to sending, raw simulation results from the FSI solver; and

modifying the raw simulation results using selected items from a collection of analysis modules, the selected items from the collection for comparing various treatment options, allowing before-and-after comparisons of aspects of the region of interest and providing quantitative assessments of parameters of interest describing the region of interest from the results.

9. The process of claim 8, wherein the act of sending includes invoking the FSI solver to accept an ensemble including at least some of:

characteristics and conditions associated with the indicia,

a description of the vascular scenario including a region of interest and associated environments,

properties of tools associated with treatment of vascular abnormalities, and

the patient-related indicia, or information identifying such; and

using the accepted ensemble to model the region of interest and provide results from modeling the region of interest.

10. The process of claim 8, wherein the act of accepting patient indicia comprises accepting indicia identifying prior assessment and simulation results for comparison to present simulation results derived from a present measurement as part of a post-treatment evaluation process.

11. The process of claim 8, further comprising importing present examination data on a continuing real-time basis as part of an intra-operative process, and comparing simulation results derived from the present examination data via the FSI solver to a planned treatment profile in order to determine what actions, if any, are warranted in order to promote achievement of the planned treatment profile.

12. The process of claim 8, wherein, following definition of a region of interest, present measured data are collected and are employed together with the information including a description of the vascular scenario by the FSI solver to provide a present simulation of the region of interest.

13. The process of claim 8, further comprising, prior to sending, optionally invoking a simplified model in order to obtain a rough estimation indicative of whether or not the values to be sent to the FSI solver via sending appear to be appropriate or appear to require adjustment prior to sending.

14. The process of claim 8, wherein the FSI solver, after sending and prior to receiving, determines, via a predetermined convergence criterion, when to terminate iteration of alternative modeling of flow simulation using computational fluid dynamics, and coupling result from flow simulation to a mechanical analysis to determine impact of the flow simulation on vasculature properties, and then employing results from the mechanical analysis to refine the modeling of flow simulation.

15. A computation engine and a memory coupled to a data collection module;

and

computer-readable code embodied on a computer-readable medium and configured so that when the computer-readable code is executed by one or more processors associated with the computation engine, the computer-readable code causes the one or more processors to;

accept input indicia from the data collection module, the input indicia identifying a particular patient and allowing access to stored records relating to prior measurements and simulations, if any, relative to that patient;

determine estimates for quantities not represented in a present measurement from a database storing characteristics of various types and conditions of vascular segments associated with a defined vascular region of interest and associated environments, to determine appropriate properties of tools associated with treatment of vascular abnormalities, in conformance with patient-related indicia, or information identifying such;

access a FSI solver, the FSI solver for accepting an ensemble including at least some of the characteristics, conditions, a description of the vascular region of interest and associated environments, the properties of tools associated with treatment of vascular abnormalities, and the patient-related indicia, or information identifying such from the input module and the database, and using the accepted ensemble to model the region of interest and provide results from modeling the region of interest;

exchange information between the input module and the database and the FSI solver, including providing results from the FSI solver to a collection of analysis modules; and

using the collection of analysis modules, and the results from the FSI solver to;

compare benefits and potential drawbacks of various treatment options;

or

allow before-and-after comparisons of aspects of the region of interest;

or

provide quantitative assessments of parameters of interest describing the region of interest from the results.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the computer readable code is further configured so that, when executed by the one or more processors, the computer readable code configured to cause the one or more processors to compare includes causing the one or more processors to compare benefits and potential drawbacks of various treatment options as part of a pre-treatment evaluation of one or more potential treatment plans.

17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the computer readable code is further configured so that, when executed by the one or more processors, the computer readable code configured to cause the one or more processors to compare includes causing the one or more processors to compare benefits and potential drawbacks of various treatment options as part of a intra-treatment process for evaluation of differences between present and planned treatment profiles, and, when warranted, determine actions, if any, appropriate for correction of apparent deviations from a planned treatment profile.

18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the computer readable code is further configured so that, when executed by the one or more processors, the computer readable code configured to cause the one or more processors to compare includes causing the one or more processors to compare benefits and potential drawbacks of various treatment options as part of a pre-operative risk assessment and treatment planning process.

19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the computer readable code is further configured so that, when executed by the one or more processors, the computer readable code is configured to cause the one or more processors to evaluate convergence, using a predetermined convergence criterion, of a process involving successive iteration of a computational fluid dynamics computation of fluid flow simulation, with an output from the fluid flow simulation being coupled to a mechanical analysis of vasculature to determine variations in the vasculature as a result of the fluid flow, and with an output of the mechanical analysis of vasculature being coupled to an input to the computational fluid dynamics computation of fluid flow simulation, and to cease iteration when the convergence criteria is achieved.

20. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the computer readable code is further configured so that, when executed by the one or more processors, the computer readable code is configured to cause the one or more processors to evaluate convergence of concatenated simulations in the FSI solver to an acceptable degree and to then supply results from the concatenated simulations to the collection of analysis modules for further processing.