SYSTEM AND METHOD TO SECURE A COMPUTER SYSTEM BY SELECTIVE CONTROL OF WRITE ACCESS TO A DATA STORAGE MEDIUM

• US 20100146589A1
• Filed: 12/22/2008
• Published: 06/10/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/21/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: DriveSentry, Inc.
• Original Assignee: DriveSentry, Inc.
• Inventors: Safa, John
• Application Number:
  US12/341,605
• Publication Number:
  US 20100146589A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/3
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/52 during program execution, e.g. stack integrity ; Preventing unwanted data erasure; Buffer overflow

Abstract

A system and method of securing a computer system by controlling write access to a storage medium by monitoring an application; detecting an attempt by the application to write data to said storage medium; interrogating a rules database in response to said detection; and permitting or denying write access to the storage medium by the application in dependence on said interrogation, where the interrogation requests are queued in order manage multiple applications running on the same system. The system can further monitor the activity of unknown processes and continually match the sequence of activity against known malware activity sequences. In the case of a match, the user is warned or the process is blocked.

Claims

1. In a computer comprising a central processing unit operatively connected to a storage medium and at least one application running on said central processing unit, a method of controlling execution of said at least one application comprising:

detecting at least one activity profile executed by the at least one application;

reading from a storage device a predetermined activity profile; and

determining whether the detected at least one activity profile matches the read predetermined activity profile.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising blocking further execution of the application if the result of the determining step is a match and the predetermined activity profile is associated with malware.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising transmitting to the central server a signature of the application code.

4. The method of claim 2 further comprising reading from a log file the sequence of activity of the application and undoing the logged activity of the application in order that the application, after being blocked and undone, would have no appreciable effect on the system.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising

querying the user for permission to continue executing the application in the event that no stored predetermined activity profile matches the application activity profile.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising

uploading to a central server the signature of the application;

and

receiving from the central server a data message comprised of data that indicates how a plurality of users responded to the query.

7. The method of claim 5 further comprising transmitting to a central server a data message comprised of data indicating how the user responded to the query.

8. The method of claim 1 where the matching step is comprised of comparing at least one aspect of a profile step, where the aspect is one of:

file type, file location, specific file, privilege level, API, filter driver and identifiable data value in a specific file

9. The method of claim 8 where the at least one aspect is file type and the file type is executable.

10. The method of claim 8 where the at least one aspect is file location and the file location is the system directory.

11. The method of claim 8 where the at least one aspect is file privilege level and the file privilege level is the system kernel.

12. The method of claim 8 where the at least one aspect is the specific file and the specific file is svchost.exe.

13. The method of claim 8 where the at least one aspect is the identifiable data value in a specific file and the identifiable data value is a registry key and the specific file is the registry file.

14. The method of any of claims 1-13 where the determining step is executed in response to the unknown program attempting to write to the mass storage device of the user computer.

15. A computer system comprising a storage medium, a central processing unit and a main memory, where said central processing unit executes any of the methods of claims 1-13.

16. A computer readable data storage medium containing digital data that, when loaded into a computer and executed as a program, causes the computer to execute any of the methods of claims 1-13.